Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did Trump break the law if he recorded a conversation without Comey's knowledge? (Original Post) RandySF May 2017 OP
Isn't Against The Law To Tape Without Permission Of The 2nd Party In DC? Me. May 2017 #1
I know it is in Maryland RandySF May 2017 #2
A president can not order wiretapping... he will be impeached if this is proven. Demsrule86 May 2017 #4
That's not wiretapping Lee-Lee May 2017 #6
Is There A Specific Law REgarding This? Me. May 2017 #7
Yes the FISA act...you need a warrant. Demsrule86 May 2017 #14
No Phoenix61 May 2017 #3
No. D.C. Is a single party consent jurisdiction Lee-Lee May 2017 #5
No, it's a bluff anyway, imo. Also, remember Nixon Bradical79 May 2017 #8
Because of Nixon HAB911 May 2017 #13
Shall we go back and argue the Watergate tapes again? nt JayhawkSD May 2017 #9
If he had a tape, he would not have fired Comey. kentuck May 2017 #10
Along these lines, Clint Watts , ex-FBI who testified at House Intel hearing, tweeted DFT: Leghorn21 May 2017 #11
Hmm ThoughtProvoker May 2017 #12

Me.

(35,454 posts)
1. Isn't Against The Law To Tape Without Permission Of The 2nd Party In DC?
Fri May 12, 2017, 10:51 AM
May 2017

In NYC for example, it's not

Demsrule86

(68,553 posts)
14. Yes the FISA act...you need a warrant.
Fri May 12, 2017, 12:33 PM
May 2017

"In 1978, largely in response to unlawful and improper surveillance by the executive branch, Congress passed FISA to regulate surveillance conducted for foreign intelligence purposes. Under FISA, when the government seeks to conduct certain types of surveillance on U.S. soil, it is generally required to apply for and obtain an individualized order from a judge on the FISA Court. If an American is the target of the surveillance, that application must be reviewed and approved by the attorney general before it goes to the FISA Court."

Phoenix61

(17,003 posts)
3. No
Fri May 12, 2017, 10:53 AM
May 2017

The District of Columbia has a one-party consent law. Comey could have recorded the conversation, legally, without Twitler's knowledge.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
5. No. D.C. Is a single party consent jurisdiction
Fri May 12, 2017, 10:54 AM
May 2017

Laws in states call for either single party consent, where only one person party to the conversation must be aware of recording to double/all party consent where all parties involved must be made aware of the recording.

Federal law and the law in DC is single party consent.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
8. No, it's a bluff anyway, imo. Also, remember Nixon
Fri May 12, 2017, 10:58 AM
May 2017

If Trump is going around recording these private conversations... well, it probably wouldn't end well for him.

Leghorn21

(13,524 posts)
11. Along these lines, Clint Watts , ex-FBI who testified at House Intel hearing, tweeted DFT:
Fri May 12, 2017, 11:12 AM
May 2017

Clint Watts
@selectedwisdom

If I were US government official now, would not take private call from White House or Trump, group conference call w/ witnesses only. twitter.com/realdonaldtrum…

7:04 AM - 12 May 2017

ThoughtProvoker

(32 posts)
12. Hmm
Fri May 12, 2017, 12:05 PM
May 2017

Interesting question.

Can anyone here with an actual legal background provide a detailed answer?

Muchas gracias.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did Trump break the law i...