General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClarence Thomas Joins Liberals, Shocks World
On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision holding that two congressional districts in North Carolina were racially gerrymandered in violation of the Constitution. The broad ruling will likely have ripple effects on litigation across the country, helping plaintiffs establish that state legislatures unlawfully injected race into redistricting. And, in a welcome change, the decision did not split along familiar ideological lines: Justice Clarence Thomas joined the four liberal justices to create a majority, following his race-blind principles of equal protection to an unusually progressive result.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/05/in_cooper_v_harris_the_supreme_court_strikes_a_blow_against_racial_redistricting.html
BigmanPigman
(51,567 posts)Quixote1818
(28,918 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,283 posts)shitgibbon can be good for something
Skittles
(153,113 posts)who knows? Glad to see him acting like a human being for a change.
burrowowl
(17,632 posts)but maybe he has come to his senses. Only time will tell.
lastlib
(23,162 posts)...though I would have supposed Clarence would have held a seance to at least try to contact him.
rpannier
(24,328 posts)this is exactly in line with what he has thought for over 20 years
It's just that, his opinions were viewed as opposed to affirmative action and the rights of the minorities.As the article points out, the left discovered that Easley and Shaw actually worked against progressive movement because it allowed the kind of outrageous gerrymandering that has gone on in places like NC
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Cha
(296,858 posts)certainly could use some good news now. I bet the Fascistrumps are Shocked too!
Mahalo, Jay
Skittles
(153,113 posts)thank you Clarence Thomas
Volaris
(10,266 posts)JI7
(89,240 posts)we always made fun of him by saying he did whatever scalia told him to but i think that was more truth than joke.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)thoughts and make up their own minds.
AwakeAtLast
(14,123 posts)JI7
(89,240 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Too bad there's no YouTube clips of the SNL skit.
Google "Long dong Silver Thomas" and you'll find SNL and C-SPAN hearings.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)And there's another, much bigger jerrymandering challenge coming.
Btw, I love that this case was brought to SCOTUS by (some currently extremely unhappy!) right-wingers trying to reinforce subversion of democracy.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)Republican will still have control of 10 of the 13 NC Congressional districts.
Hamlette
(15,408 posts)hell froze over? Is he such an ideologue that he can't stand Trump might not be a true conservative? (He sure has governed that way so far). Soul searching? Converted to ESP?
ATL Ebony
(1,097 posts)rpannier
(24,328 posts)He voted the same way he did 20+ years ago in Shaw v Hunt
It's just back then, the liberal wing supported the gerrymandered districts and the conservatives did not
So it failed
He also voted the same way in Easley (2001). O' Connor flipped in that one, so it passed
He's been consistent on this
Amishman
(5,554 posts)While I strongly disagree with darn near all of his beliefs, I will give Thomas credit in that he follows them regardless of the political outcome.
nkpolitics1212
(8,617 posts)Ginsburg,Breyer,Kagen,and Sotomayor are the Liberal jurists.
Roberts,Alito,Gorsuch,and Thomas are the Conservative Jurists.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)12th district was gerrymandered by Democrats to yield a black representative, back in the bad old days when white Southern Dems wouldn't vote for black Dems. Thomas voted against that too, so he's being consistent, at least.
According to Election Law post, the loss of Kennedy is the more unexpected
http://electionlawblog.org/?p=92707
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Good to know.
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)They only relate/identity with people the same as them, the same struggles.
TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)GBizzle
(209 posts)He doesn't have Scalia to lead him around by the nose any more, and it would be so funny to see the Republicans go nuts after all the bullshit they pulled putting Gorsuch on the court.
Bush Sr., after all, did appoint David Souter. So it's not completely outside the realm of possibility.
Shrek
(3,975 posts)It's the other justices who are all over the place.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)Without Scalia in his ear he may actually be thinking more clearly. I hope it keeps up.