Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
Tue May 23, 2017, 03:57 PM May 2017

Your Daily Greenwald keeps setting the bar lower and lower...







Can we get back the 2014 Greenwald? The one who made lists of every journalist who didn't give Obama/Clinton the Fox News/InfoWars/Breitbart/NewsMax flavor of coverage, and gleefully pilloried each one? The Greenwald who said any journalist who wasn't critical of the Obama WH was a beltway insider stenographer lapdog?
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Your Daily Greenwald keeps setting the bar lower and lower... (Original Post) Blue_Tires May 2017 OP
Technically, has there been any actual evidence? leftstreet May 2017 #1
Good luck with that meme. emulatorloo May 2017 #3
Thanks for the link leftstreet May 2017 #4
Yr welcome! I wished I'd gotten to watch it! emulatorloo May 2017 #6
If the investigations have revealed evidence, then I've missed it leetexy May 2017 #9
"No evidence" ha ha emulatorloo May 2017 #2
He and Assange have been carrying water for Putin for too long... bettyellen May 2017 #5
He already sold out. Fuck him. nt JTFrog May 2017 #7
Evidence is what is introduced into a court of law Mr. Ected May 2017 #8

leftstreet

(36,101 posts)
1. Technically, has there been any actual evidence?
Tue May 23, 2017, 04:02 PM
May 2017

I don't follow Greenwald or The HIll or whatever, but I haven't seen media reports about actual evidence yet



If the investigations have revealed evidence, then I've missed it

emulatorloo

(44,068 posts)
3. Good luck with that meme.
Tue May 23, 2017, 04:10 PM
May 2017

It's really not working out well for the Trump apologists in Congress.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029106349
"Republicans Focus on Protecting Trump at Russia Hearing"

Direct link:

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/05/republicans-protect-trump-at-house-intelligence-hearing-russia

They kept pressing ex-CIA chief John Brennan to say no evidence of Moscow-campaign collusion exists.

David Corn
May 23, 2017 1:55 PM

The Republicans still are not serious about investigating the Trump-Russia scandal. That message came through resoundingly when the House intelligence committee held a public hearing on Tuesday morning with former CIA chief John Brennan. (Actually, this was not officially a committee hearing. Democrats on the committee were informed earlier this would be considered a "task force" hearing because the Republican chairman of the committee, Rep. Devin Nunes, could not appear because he had recused himself from the Russia investigation.)

At the witness table, Brennan told a harrowing tale. As CIA director last summer, he saw what was happening with the hack-and-leak attack on the Democratic National Committee, and he reviewed top-secret intelligence and concluded that Russia was mounting this assault to disrupt the election, hurt Hillary Clinton, and help Donald Trump. He also at the time was aware of intelligence that showed contacts between Trump associates and Russia, and that caused him to conclude a thorough FBI investigation was warranted. He testified, "I saw interaction" that warranted concern.

This was a big deal. In March, then-FBI chief James Comey revealed during testimony to this committee that in July 2016 the bureau launched an investigation of contacts between Trump associates and Russia. Now the CIA head from then was stating that there was clear intelligence that justified that probe. He also revealed that in early August he was so concerned about the Russian operation he spoke to the head of Russia's FSB, the country's intelligence service, and warned him to knock it off. Brennan also revealed that in August and September he briefed a small number of congressional leaders and shared with them top-secret intelligence about Moscow's effort to subvert the election in part to benefit Donald Trump. (This means that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan knew many details about the Russian operation but didn't challenge or correct Trump's continued public assertions that Russia was not necessarily the culprit in the DNC hack.)

Yet once again Republicans did not focus on the main elements of the story. When the Republicans on the committee had the chance to question Brennan, they did not press him for more details on Russia's information warfare against the United States. Instead, they fixated on protecting Trump.

leetexy

(3 posts)
9. If the investigations have revealed evidence, then I've missed it
Tue May 23, 2017, 07:10 PM
May 2017

If the investigations have revealed evidence, then I've missed it

emulatorloo

(44,068 posts)
2. "No evidence" ha ha
Tue May 23, 2017, 04:06 PM
May 2017

Why does it not surprise me the Greenwald's deceptively spinning poll data?

Last bastion of delusion and hope for Trumpsters and Greenwald fans. They'll never admit they're in denial and/or lying.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
5. He and Assange have been carrying water for Putin for too long...
Tue May 23, 2017, 05:44 PM
May 2017

Any "lefty" that still falls for their bullshit is as dumb as your average Trump voter.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
8. Evidence is what is introduced into a court of law
Tue May 23, 2017, 07:10 PM
May 2017

To be saying that an investigation lacks merit because there is no evidence of a crime is ludicrous. We're not at the stage where evidence is relevant.

The leaks are not evidence, to be sure. They are simply devices by which the American public is allowed to peak into the semi-secret environment of the investigations.

Don't worry, Glenn. There will be evidence aplenty for you in the coming months. But you won't like it, either, so you'll deride the evidence itself when given the opportunity, you slimeball.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Your Daily Greenwald keep...