Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnyCanuck

(9,922 posts)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 09:19 PM Jul 2012

Barclays insider lifts lid on bank's toxic culture- Diamond would have known of traders activities

A former senior Barclays employee today exposes the "culture of fear" that operated at the bank and claims Bob Diamond would have been aware of his traders' activities.

Speaking exclusively to The Independent, the banker alleges that senior executives would have known of Libor fiddling in 2008.

The Serious Fraud Office announced yesterday that it had launched a criminal inquiry into interest rate fixing amid increasing clamour for rogue bankers to be prosecuted.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the banker says that senior Barclays bosses would have been told about Libor concerns because staff were drilled to pass anything untoward up to their managers. Failure to do this meant the sack.

"Libor fixing was escalated by several people up to their directors, they would then have escalated it up the line because at Barclays if you don't escalate, and it is found out that you haven't, it is grounds for disciplinary action. You will be dismissed."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/exclusive-barclays-insider-lifts-lid-on-banks-toxic-culture-7920809.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Barclays insider lifts lid on bank's toxic culture- Diamond would have known of traders activities (Original Post) JohnyCanuck Jul 2012 OP
right, no way he didn't know. but why should it matter? here's a thought: unblock Jul 2012 #1

unblock

(52,095 posts)
1. right, no way he didn't know. but why should it matter? here's a thought:
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 09:47 PM
Jul 2012

anyone compensated in a way that takes a giant share of the credit when things go right should take a giant share of criminal responsibility and civil liability when things aren't kosher.

hey, that's one way to create a "maximum wage". hey, you're free to earn total compensation in excess of 10 times the lowest paid worker, but if you do, you accept criminal responsibility for any crimes committed by the company.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Barclays insider lifts li...