General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWire headline:ATTORNEY FOR TRUMP SON-IN-LAW KUSHNER SAYS HAS NO RECOLLECTION OF CALLS WITH RUSSIAN
Wire headline:ATTORNEY FOR TRUMP SON-IN-LAW KUSHNER SAYS HAS NO RECOLLECTION OF CALLS WITH RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR KISLYAK AS REPORTED BY REUTERS
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
ck4829
(34,971 posts)madaboutharry
(40,149 posts)They are weasel words. This is a statement that an attorney puts out when they haven't yet gotten their client to tell them the truth.
Kablooie
(18,571 posts)malaise
(267,791 posts)Why TF is he talking about calls?
mcar
(42,206 posts)I never called him, honest. No, dipshit, you met with him F2F.
malaise
(267,791 posts)Russian envoys
mcar
(42,206 posts)malaise
(267,791 posts)Amazing
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Luciferous
(6,067 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Oh THOSE calls?
Solly Mack
(90,740 posts)Do they ever?
Snort.
TexasTowelie
(111,285 posts)What is Jared's excuse?
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)THE IRAN-CONTRA HEARINGS : Admiral Didn't Recall 184 Times
July 24, 1987
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Generally you're not going to say anything at this point. If you are compelled to comment, either you issue a flat denial or something like "My client is looking forward to having all the facts come out." Even Flynn's guy saying "My client has a story to tell" is better than "No recollection". That's mind boggling.
dalton99a
(81,065 posts)Amaryllis
(9,523 posts)Must be catching.