General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRaw Story headline today - "DONALD TRUMP TO HUNGRY SENIORS : DROP DEAD"
(Raw Story has the best headlines for posting on Facebook - esp. for those ignorant republicans on your Facebook page. How f**king sick are these Republicans)
The budget sent to Congress Tuesday for fiscal year 2018 puts the countrys schizophrenia over feeding hungry citizens back on the agenda this time in the guise of defunding food programs for seniors, millions of whom are homebound, ill and unable to cook or shop. In March, the Trump administration announced it was slashing federal funds for those programs, meaning that more seniors will go hungry, and waiting lists already numbering in the thousands in some parts of the country will get larger. The wait for a meal will get longer, too, leaving thousands of seniors, including those just discharged from a hospital, with few options for nutritious food.
As the number of seniors has increased, so has the number of people, particularly the very old, who need food. Yet over the years, increases in federal funding funneled primarily through the Older Americans Act, which accounts for about 35 percent of the budgets of the nations roughly 5,000 meal programs have not kept pace with the need, as I reported for The Nation in 1998 and 2013.
This year, the Trump budget calls for real cuts in food programs for seniors, not just smaller increases. Erika Kelly, the government affairs officer for Meals on Wheels America, an umbrella organization for the Meals on Wheels network, says the network is already serving 23 million fewer meals than in 2005, a decline that has resulted in an increase in hunger. Today some 10 million elders are threatened by hunger, a 65 percent increase over the past decade.
Apparently, numbers like those dont bother Trump budget director Mick Mulvaney. As the budget was unveiled, Mulvaney remarked, This is the first time, I think, in a long time that an administration has written a budget through the eyes of the people who are actually paying the taxes. Were not going to measure our success by how much money we spend but by how many people we actually help. And at his March news conference, Mulvaney disdainfully told reporters MEALS ON WHEELS DIDN'T HELP THE PEOPLE it was designed to serve. Meals on Wheels sounds great, but to take that federal money and give it to the states, and say, Look, we want to give you money for programs that dont work I cant defend that anymore.
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/05/donald-trump-to-hungry-seniors-drop-dead/
dchill
(38,432 posts)But there's worse. I call it being Mulvaney.
Mountain Mule
(1,002 posts)I am 65 years old and disabled. My check from SSDI is pathetic and I'm forced to rely on SNAP and sometimes the local food pantry for my meals. I consign the Traitor and Company to the innermost circles of hell for their assault on Americans most in need of help. I thank God that I live in a place where I can have a huge vegetable garden to help me get by. Alas, most Americans in my position don't even have that.
womanofthehills
(8,657 posts)She is unable to drive or garden. She relies on others to do her grocery shopping and relies big time on Meals on Wheels.
Not only does she get a noon meal but it saves her money on food.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,148 posts)womanofthehills
(8,657 posts)God! Mulvaney is such a asshole.