HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » What if... Clinton had wo...

Sun May 28, 2017, 11:58 AM

What if... Clinton had won, and Chelsea had done what Jared is accused of?

What then?....An interesting thought game about republicans.

.Ryan, Mc Connell, etc...How would they be acting now? Asking for a private line to Russia? Financial Dealings with Russia...etc..etc..etc.

How would republican leaders and that party as a whole, be talking if it were Chelsea not Jared?
Right now there is still some talk about the so called..........emails.....and a server...even today.

So, How awful are these people? I do not think that Chelsea would have one moment of peace if the situation were reversed.. and..If Clinton were President, where would Trump be in this story about Chelsea?
Would the impeachment of the President already have started if it were Chelsea?.

.This game about Chelsea focuses on what true hypocrites they are. I don't hear much about Jared from McConnell and Ryan. (or most of them for that matter)..yes a few...but most are very quiet..But what do you think?

13 replies, 6205 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread

Response to Stuart G (Original post)

Sun May 28, 2017, 12:03 PM

1. oh yeah there would be lynch mobs at the White House

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to luvMIdog (Reply #1)

Sun May 28, 2017, 12:05 PM

3. Yes, ...thinking of those mobs is really something...nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stuart G (Reply #3)

Sun May 28, 2017, 12:07 PM

5. most of his supporters are all for violence when it suits their agenda

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to luvMIdog (Reply #5)

Sun May 28, 2017, 12:11 PM

7. Yes... "..most of his supporters are all for violence when it suits their agenda."

Yes...!! can't top that one...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to luvMIdog (Reply #5)

Sun May 28, 2017, 01:36 PM

12. Bingo!

+1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stuart G (Original post)

Sun May 28, 2017, 12:04 PM

2. We Always Play These "What If...." Games Here On DU.....

we all know how the Repugs would react if the shoe were on the other foot. The real question is - why aren't the Dem's as aggressive?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #2)

Sun May 28, 2017, 12:07 PM

4. Interesting question isn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #2)

Sun May 28, 2017, 12:08 PM

6. Great Point. We need to be as "aggressive" as possible..

or as "aggressive and mean" as the Repugs were with Obama. We need to fight fire...with fire..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stuart G (Original post)

Sun May 28, 2017, 12:26 PM

8. Two teams: one always plays by the rules, the other always cheats

Does the team that plays fair need to start cheating to win?

What if the referees and scorekeepers are cheating as well?

Integrity is vital, but so is survival. It's a tough question.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stuart G (Original post)

Sun May 28, 2017, 01:21 PM

9. The GOP would have already passed a "burning at stake" law in the House and Senate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stuart G (Original post)

Sun May 28, 2017, 01:25 PM

10. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stuart G (Original post)

Sun May 28, 2017, 01:26 PM

11. The answer is so obvious it needs only smilies. Republicans go...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stuart G (Original post)

Sun May 28, 2017, 01:39 PM

13. it wouldn't have even gotten to that point. they were already attacking for her working on the

 

Clinton foundation. Even though there was no wrongdoing they made up shit like paying for her wedding with that money.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread