Mon May 29, 2017, 08:25 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
BTW photo of LM and Milo is from July 2016 not Election night.Last edited Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:43 AM - Edit history (2)
My main point in this OP is about the photo circulating with wrong Hotel & date.
Not Trump Hotel election night! Yes Waldorf Hotel July 2016. edit: @LouiseMensch A little note. @puppymnkey and Milo Yiannopoulous lied about this photo. It was taken last July. Not post-election https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOrvjn_KTF_6dDImf6QAL-gyH-DrzzCdL4QdXkRvWirD4QfZAvT4sjqpodacgJipA?key=MHkwTVVrYmpUalZRSzZvUjY0 https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/ 869382376853516288 Here: It wasn't on election night. did somebody say that?? It was last summer. I spent election night in Utah with @Evan_McMullin @MindyFinn thats wrong. was in UT. summer photo, I could pull the date... hold on. July 24, 2016. Except they were taken last summer at the Waldorf, spent Election night in Utah with patriots by the names of @Evan_McMullin and supporters https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/ 869234594268286976 https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/ 869245826849230850 https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/ 869235748146434048 End. ![]() Thought it'd be nice to correct wrong info on that point. I follow her and 10 other people I like. Will continue to do so.
|
37 replies, 10588 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Madam45for2923 | May 2017 | OP |
Madam45for2923 | May 2017 | #1 | |
Charlotte Little | Jun 2017 | #2 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #3 | |
Charlotte Little | Jun 2017 | #4 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #5 | |
Charlotte Little | Jun 2017 | #11 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #25 | |
The_jackalope | Jun 2017 | #17 | |
pnwmom | Jun 2017 | #21 | |
melman | Jun 2017 | #6 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #7 | |
melman | Jun 2017 | #8 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #10 | |
Charlotte Little | Jun 2017 | #12 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #14 | |
Charlotte Little | Jun 2017 | #15 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #23 | |
Orrex | Jun 2017 | #30 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #31 | |
The_jackalope | Jun 2017 | #32 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #33 | |
Orrex | Jun 2017 | #34 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #35 | |
Orrex | Jun 2017 | #37 | |
pnwmom | Jun 2017 | #22 | |
melman | Jun 2017 | #24 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #26 | |
lunasun | Jun 2017 | #27 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #36 | |
demmiblue | Jun 2017 | #9 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #13 | |
demmiblue | Jun 2017 | #16 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #18 | |
demmiblue | Jun 2017 | #19 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #20 | |
lunasun | Jun 2017 | #28 | |
Madam45for2923 | Jun 2017 | #29 |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon May 29, 2017, 08:37 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
1. Kicking!
![]() |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 06:19 PM
Charlotte Little (658 posts)
2. Don't exist
The links to her status are all saying the page doesn't exist, which means she deleted them.
So... ![]() |
Response to Charlotte Little (Reply #2)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 06:30 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
3. ???
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #3)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 06:38 PM
Charlotte Little (658 posts)
4. Click on the Status Links You Provided
The tweets have been deleted. Louise deleted them.
|
Response to Charlotte Little (Reply #4)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:14 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
5. I have not checked twitter for a few days- will check. She tweets alot n then let's people know she
will be cleaning her twitter feed by deleting tweets.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #5)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:44 PM
Charlotte Little (658 posts)
11. Cleaning her twitter feed?
She is not cleaning - she's deleting tweets that are lies or that someone's called her out on. Seems awfully suspicious she'd need to "clean" those tweets about the photo with Milo, anyway. I mean, if she's being honest about the whole thing, then...
|
Response to Charlotte Little (Reply #11)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 08:37 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
25. Ah looks like they are still there as you can see below, plus I added another.
Response to Charlotte Little (Reply #2)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:00 PM
The_jackalope (1,660 posts)
17. The links got accidentally broken - an extra space was inserted in the URL.
Response to Charlotte Little (Reply #2)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:19 PM
pnwmom (107,306 posts)
21. Doesn't matter. Anyone who knows the hotels knows that can't be election night.
Wrong hotel.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:22 PM
melman (7,681 posts)
6. Totally irrelevant when it was taken
The important thing is that this person was friends with a scumbag like Milo. Says a lot. Everything really.
|
Response to melman (Reply #6)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:35 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
7. Okee! Don't read her. As for me going back to reading LM whenever I please.
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #7)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:39 PM
melman (7,681 posts)
8. Didn't say you couldn't
But if you are going to promote this right-wing blogger here, other people might have things to say about it.
That's how message boards work. |
Response to melman (Reply #8)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:44 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
10. She is putting country before Party. She is totally disgusted with the GOP not fighting Trump
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #10)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:46 PM
Charlotte Little (658 posts)
12. She's spreading bunk
Nothing more, nothing less. And why she's doing it is to cause chaos and promote herself. She's known for these kinds of antics. I got wise and unfollowed her. Now, when I do go and peek at her TL, I laugh. She doesn't even know how our laws work.
![]() |
Response to Charlotte Little (Reply #12)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:48 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
14. Many here think like moi! Many here think like toi! We disagree! Ah well.
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #14)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:51 PM
Charlotte Little (658 posts)
15. No
Many here want to believe a person who is nothing more than an opportunist while the rest of us are wise to her schtick and are quite honestly sick of the promotion of her.
And why is this about YOU? YOU put up a thread with links that lead to deleted tweets. I was simply pointing that out to you. Maybe a more reasonable response would be to take this thread down since you got nothing to back it. ![]() |
Response to Charlotte Little (Reply #15)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:30 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
23. Here I added to OP: https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/869382376853516288
Link to tweet Link to tweet Charlotte Little 15. No Many here want to believe a person who is nothing more than an opportunist while the rest of us are wise to her schtick and are quite honestly sick of the promotion of her. And why is this about YOU? YOU put up a thread with links that lead to deleted tweets. I was simply pointing that out to you. Maybe a more reasonable response would be to take this thread down since you got nothing to back it. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #7)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:08 AM
Orrex (62,054 posts)
30. Could you post a list of the times she's been right?
That is, examples of her earth-shattering scoops that were actually verified to be correct, as opposed to tweets that simply haven't been disproven.
She has been repeatedly and spectacularly wrong, yet people lap up her tweets as quickly as she posts them. Despite her (conspicuously) passionate fans, she is the poster child for the Left's Fake News. I look forward to your list of her verified claims. |
Response to Orrex (Reply #30)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:27 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
31. She knew about FISA and wrote about it days before the election.
She knew from the start that Comey was investigating Trump when everyone thought that Comey wanted Trump to win election.
She knew that FVEY spies (along with our CI) had the goods on many surrounding and including Donald: Most Trumps, Manafort, Sessions, Flynn, Ryan, Reince, Page, Bannon, Nunes, Sater, Epshteyn (f*ck list is endless). She in the open along with others investigate all of the clowns mentioned above, finding what is open to the public and connecting it all --while our media either sits on all of that, or does not care, or is asleep. She knew that CI was not gonna let Donald be. She knew that M15 ex-spy Steele's dossier is more correct than people thought from the beginning. She was there to investigate flight plans that coincided between some Russian billionaire and Donald & co. She knew Wikileaks and Putin were pretty much synonymous- when people were just scratching their heads. She knew there were actions being taken at the Virginia courts that were not public. She has been openly investigating (with the help of others) all sorts of bots and their connections (In the open!) She and her lawyers are quick to use FOIA on most anything related to this mis-administration. She hates team treason and she is strongly parked in team resistance. SHE DOES MOST OF THE ABOVE IN THE OPEN TOGETHER WITH ANYONE WHO HAS TIME AND EXPERTISE TO HELP. We can all see the process and make up our own minds. She shares whatever scoop she gets from her sources. Does not just sit on it like our MSM does. She let us know what comes from her sources, and what comes from her connecting the dots, again we can make up our mind. AGAIN, WE CAN MAKE UP OUR OWN MINDS. I love all the people taking TRUMP/RUSSIA seriously & trying to help uncover the mess that it is. I love also that by their actions the MSM cannot put it all under the rug. It pushes the MSM to do their jobs. PS: This is just my list offhand. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #31)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:34 AM
The_jackalope (1,660 posts)
32. You can add Jeff Sessions and Boris Epshteyn to that list. nt
Response to The_jackalope (Reply #32)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:38 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
33. Done! Thank you.
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #31)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:40 AM
Orrex (62,054 posts)
34. I'm not sure about those, frankly
One or two seem spot on, most seem sort of "in the ballpark," and the rest are kind of vaguely truthish.
I am likewise thrilled that people are pursuing the Trump/Russia connection, but I am not so eager to believe in that collusion that I am willing to embrace sketchy clickbait sources like Mensch, no matter how feverishly people retweet her. Here's a good (and troubling) story about Mensch that ran yesterday on NPR's excellent program On The Media with Brooke Gladstone. Well worth a listen. |
Response to Orrex (Reply #34)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:51 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
35. Like I said, she does most of her thinking/investigating in the open and out loud.
We can see where her thoughts are going and when she self-corrects and why.
People call her on stuff, they discuss it, and with new information, she corrects her course if new info seems more correct. It is all in the open. I understand why she would not be everyone's cup of tea. Everyone can read or not, or stop reading. I just HATE people trying to MAKE others do as they do or do not. Not talking about you, just saying. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #35)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 10:07 AM
Orrex (62,054 posts)
37. That's a reasonable position to take (nt)
Response to melman (Reply #6)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:25 PM
pnwmom (107,306 posts)
22. And Bernie's staffer, Tad Devine, previously worked with Paul Manafort
for a pro-Putin candidate, Viktor Yanukovych, in his 2010 presidential campaign in Ukraine.
If you're going to smear people for past associations, don't forget that Tad Devine and Paul Manafort were once on the same team. Does that make Tad Devine a scumbag like Manafort? I don't think so, but by your reasoning . . . . http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/04/paul_manafort_isn_t_a_gop_retread_he_s_made_a_career_of_reinventing_tyrants.html |
Response to pnwmom (Reply #22)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 10:09 PM
melman (7,681 posts)
24. lol 'past associations'
You keep trying to make it seem like he was just a casual acquaintance a long time ago.
But here is the great LM aggressively defending her 'past associate' when he was banned from twitter. Less than a year ago. I don't have to remind you why he was banned. I'm sure you know. And so did she. [img] [img] ![]() ![]() [img] ![]() [/img] [img] ![]() [img] ![]() [img] ![]() |
Response to melman (Reply #24)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 08:38 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
26. That was July of 2016. Not now.
Response to melman (Reply #24)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 08:48 AM
lunasun (21,646 posts)
27. Thanks . Hope most people take a good read of the links in your post.
Response to lunasun (Reply #27)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:54 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
36. July 2016- She at the time was more into defending freedom of speech- even Milo's
These days- She is not friends with Milo, as she sees him in cahoots with Trump/Russia and SHE HATES TEAM TREASON.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:41 PM
demmiblue (35,198 posts)
9. Fake news/fake links.
![]() |
Response to demmiblue (Reply #9)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:46 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
13. Easy & dismissive put down. Don't read her. I will.
She is putting Country over party and is utterly disgusted by the GOP helping Trump.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #13)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:52 PM
demmiblue (35,198 posts)
16. Of course it is easy... that they are fake links is kind of, well, indisputable.
![]() |
Response to demmiblue (Reply #16)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:12 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
18. Your say/opinion. I opine that many that oppose her are fake & I say this is indisputable too.
Fake people, fake concerns, fake sincerity and so forth & so on....
Mind you I did not say all. Some are real and sincere,,, but not all. demmiblue 16. Of course it is easy... that they are fake links is kind of, well, indisputable. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #18)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:14 PM
demmiblue (35,198 posts)
19. Lol!
Madam45for2923
18. Your say/opinion. I opine that many that oppose her are fake & I say this is indisputable too. Fake people, fake concerns, fake sincerity and so forth & so on.... Mind you I did not say all. Some are real and sincere,,, but not all. demmiblue 16. Of course it is easy... that they are fake links is kind of, well, indisputable. |
Response to demmiblue (Reply #19)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:18 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
20. Indisputable Indisputability.
![]() |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 08:58 AM
lunasun (21,646 posts)
28. Daily advert insert
![]() ![]() ![]() I am already reading articles in msm about all the left's fake news they are buying and sites are mentioned along with links to prove it. Excellent set up that I will admit |
Response to lunasun (Reply #28)
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:05 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
29. My main point in this OP is about the photo circulating with wrong Hotel & date.
Not Trump Hotel election night!
Yes Waldorf Hotel July 2016. |