General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHannity shares call to target Maddow's advertisers
BY JOE CONCHA - 05/30/17 11:18 AM EDT
Fox News host Sean Hannity on Tuesday shared a story that urges people to boycott companies that advertise on Rachel Maddows MSNBC show.
Hannity retweeted a story from conservative blog Media Equalizer that sides with him in the wake of advertisers pulling ads from his Fox show and calls for pressure on those that advertise on MSNBC.
Link to tweet
"To counteract these fascistic tactics, #StoptheScalpings has decided to fight fire with fire," the Media Equalizer story says. "As long as Media Matters continues to attack conservatives, we will return them the same kindness."
"We begin with Rachel Maddow who has been the biggest purveyor of lies and propaganda in the media today. Like Media Matters, we will now inform the public and the advertisers about who they are financing," it continues. "While we prefer not to be involved in this type of effort, we need to be on equal footing. We will continue to announce the advertisers that finance these efforts and support these hosts who allow lies and conspiracy theories to permeate the airwaves." The Media Equalizer article includes contact info for companies that advertise on Maddow's show.
more
http://thehill.com/media/335610-hannity-shares-call-to-target-maddows-advertisers
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,155 posts)Oh, can't think of one, Sean?
You smarmy asshole.
Bleacher Creature
(11,254 posts)I normally don't take pleasure in watching someone's career go down in flames, but I made an exception for O'Reilly and will do it again for Hannity.
underpants
(182,632 posts)Neeeeever heard of it
rurallib
(62,387 posts)Equal must mean 99.9%
Wounded Bear
(58,605 posts)Good luck with that Sean.
Initech
(100,043 posts)And not a single one of them has stuck. So I'm guessing this will backfire on them big time.
mythology
(9,527 posts)I wonder if they just didn't notice that the name starts with SS. I get that StoptheScalpings is a long name and so they shortened it, but I would think they would want to avoid SS for obvious reasons.
Leith
(7,808 posts)SScalpings does not conjure up any kind of good imagery.
Initech
(100,043 posts)Or maybe:
Scoopster
(423 posts)Use their hit list to express our support for advertisers on Maddow.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Sad.
Initech
(100,043 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)C_U_L8R
(44,992 posts)Besides Deplorables have no economic clout.
Dumbshits don't earn or spend. Any self-respecting
brand would laugh.
nykym
(3,063 posts)Media Equalizer?