Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

deminks

(11,014 posts) Sat Jun 3, 2017, 03:34 PM Jun 2017

Is this what happens when you don't have a public editor anymore?

Link to tweet

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/02/public-editor/liz-spayd-final-public-editor-column.html?_r=0

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is this what happens when you don't have a public editor anymore? (Original Post) deminks Jun 2017 OP

WOW! They could only find one! And why are they pushing this story that talks to four guys Squinch Jun 2017 #1

They should have gotten rid of whoever though that they should treat the Email issue of 2016 SaschaHM Jun 2017 #2

They should have fired the fool that told them to promote the "Clinton Cash" book too emulatorloo Jun 2017 #4

Ridiculous. Thanks for posting. emulatorloo Jun 2017 #3

Squinch

(50,949 posts)

1. WOW! They could only find one! And why are they pushing this story that talks to four guys

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jun 3, 2017, 03:42 PM

Jun 2017

and concludes that there is thunderous Trump support among small business owners.

All the replies to the article were, "I am a small business owner and Trump sucks!"

This is bizarre.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)

2. They should have gotten rid of whoever though that they should treat the Email issue of 2016

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jun 3, 2017, 03:42 PM

Jun 2017

like a full blown national crisis while we were actually experiencing one.

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)

4. They should have fired the fool that told them to promote the "Clinton Cash" book too

Reply to SaschaHM (Reply #2)

Sat Jun 3, 2017, 03:51 PM

Jun 2017

That wingnut lie book was discredited/debunked before it even came out, but the NYT had an "exclusive" so they promoted it constantly as if it were the gospel truth.

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)

3. Ridiculous. Thanks for posting.

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Sat Jun 3, 2017, 03:47 PM

Jun 2017

Reply to this discussion