Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
1. The surveys of him getting 2x of their support than Hillary probably threw them off.
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 08:21 AM
Jun 2017

"Perhaps the most contested question from the 2016 presidential election is what factors motivated white working-class voters to support Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton by a margin of roughly two to one.

New analysis by PRRI and The Atlantic, based on surveys conducted before and after the 2016 election, developed a model to test a variety of potential factors influencing support for Trump among white working-class voters. .."

https://www.prri.org/research/white-working-class-attitudes-economy-trade-immigration-election-donald-trump/

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
7. Those who reported being in fair or poor financial shape were 1.7 x more likely to support HRC"
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 12:29 PM
Jun 2017

"Economic factors played a much smaller role, suggesting that Trump’s rise was shaped more by cultural and racial concerns than by economics. For example, white working-class voters who displayed economic fatalism — measured through the belief that getting a college education is “a gamble” — were only twice as likely to prefer Trump.

And economic hardship among white working-class Americans actually predicted more support for Hillary Clinton, not Trump: Although not highly statistically significant, the survey found that “[t]hose who reported being in fair or poor financial shape were 1.7 times more likely to support Clinton, compared to those who were in better financial shape.” This finding rebukes the common sentiment that poor white Americans came out in droves to put Trump over the top in 2016."



https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/9/15592634/trump-clinton-racism-economy-prri-survey

melm00se

(4,986 posts)
2. Question
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 08:22 AM
Jun 2017

Does this analysis hold up at the state level especially in Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania?


 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
3. Before the election, I saw many Trump signs displayed in very wealthy areas of the city.
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 08:45 AM
Jun 2017

Homes owned by bankers, lawyers, doctors and so on.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,964 posts)
5. The article doesn't compare the stats with stats for the general population or electorate.
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 09:31 AM
Jun 2017

(at least not that I could find in a skim)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Puncturing the myth that ...