Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 08:37 PM Jun 2017

Jill Wine-Banks just nailed one of Trump's escape hatches shut on Chris Hayes

Last edited Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:22 PM - Edit history (1)

1). "Trump didn't know it was wrong to talk to Comey 1-on-1" talking point was raised in the discussion

2). CANDIDATE Trump "complained bitterly" when Bill Clinton got on Loretta Lynch's plane "during an ongoing investigation" (even though he had NO EVIDENCE that a WORD of that was discussed), SO...

3). CANDIDATE Trump knew attempting to influence an ongoing investigation is WRONG, SO...

4). PRESIDENT TRUMP KNOWS, AND KNEW, that nine 1-on-1 conversations with Comey about an ongoing investigation was WRONG, also known as "obstruction of justice."

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jill Wine-Banks just nailed one of Trump's escape hatches shut on Chris Hayes (Original Post) Miles Archer Jun 2017 OP
K&R n/t rzemanfl Jun 2017 #1
Nice! leftstreet Jun 2017 #2
Yep and to the greatest page malaise Jun 2017 #3
K & R GP6971 Jun 2017 #4
K&R! gademocrat7 Jun 2017 #5
But that's deductive reasoning ProudLib72 Jun 2017 #6
And any type of reasoning is the work of the devil! erronis Jun 2017 #17
God has been making the rounds more frequently ProudLib72 Jun 2017 #29
LOL :-) iluvtennis Jun 2017 #28
Putting out an opening statement will allow Comey to prepare for the attack: so far AnotherMother4Peace Jun 2017 #7
Another reason to put out an opening statement is to prevent a last minute Trump shut down AnotherMother4Peace Jun 2017 #25
And, apparently, Comey explained to the president that the FBI director position Baitball Blogger Jun 2017 #8
so Trump can't complain and say he didn't know. HE WAS NOT IGNORANT. He knew. trueblue2007 Jun 2017 #10
Yes lpbk2713 Jun 2017 #9
That was a good observation she made about Trump criticizing Bill Clinton meeting Loretta Lynch wishstar Jun 2017 #11
Excellent. K&R. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2017 #12
I don't think Jill Wine-Banks was ever an FBI Agent, but marybourg Jun 2017 #13
I edited the thread title Miles Archer Jun 2017 #15
Thank you for grabbing the story. marybourg Jun 2017 #16
Beauty! H2O Man Jun 2017 #14
I'm sorry - I must have missed the source to this thread. erronis Jun 2017 #18
Chris Hayes, MSNBC, no link, I transcribed it, it's in my thread title Miles Archer Jun 2017 #22
Ironic that the day *45 1st attempted to obstruct justice was same day WH counsel formally MedusaX Jun 2017 #19
great point roscoeroscoe Jun 2017 #35
Intent. Barack_America Jun 2017 #20
The word "innocent" has been tossed around all night Miles Archer Jun 2017 #24
Of course, he wasn't really a successful CEO, though that's beside the point. LisaM Jun 2017 #40
Trump and his surrogates can't pretend he didn't know. nt oasis Jun 2017 #21
it doesn't even matter if he knew it was wrong. it is still a crime Takket Jun 2017 #23
The GOPers and drumpers are really going all out with their think tank talking points. BSdetect Jun 2017 #26
HUM how does that saying go? bluestarone Jun 2017 #27
K&R for... meow2u3 Jun 2017 #30
Lock him up? Cracklin Charlie Jun 2017 #31
Yup. That was brilliant. SunSeeker Jun 2017 #32
Saw it and loved it. The way she explained that there was no evidence R B Garr Jun 2017 #33
Saw Wine too & loved her perfunctory dismissal of Trump's 'ignorance"defense stuffmatters Jun 2017 #34
One more brick in the wall that will shut Trump in for life. Nitram Jun 2017 #36
The way he handled proves he knows he was doing wrong. lark Jun 2017 #37
k and r niyad Jun 2017 #38
Oh...logic. Wednesdays Jun 2017 #39
Completely frustrating to be more equipped to govern than nearly the entire GOP. SleeplessinSoCal Jun 2017 #41
No, no, no. He's knows it's wrong if the Clintons do it. If he does stuff, well, that's different. tclambert Jun 2017 #42
Watergate Prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks L. Coyote Jun 2017 #43

erronis

(15,238 posts)
17. And any type of reasoning is the work of the devil!
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:28 PM
Jun 2017

You know it is RIGHT if your god (or gut in the case of rump) tells you so.

So many RIGHTeous aholes in the repuglican party. Do the gravitate to that dark hole, or are they sucked in? What an embarrassment to our homo predecessors. Guess survival of the fittest doesn't work since they don't believe in evolution.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
29. God has been making the rounds more frequently
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 10:52 PM
Jun 2017

Hasn't he? God is going to sort out climate change and all the heathens who hate tRump.

AnotherMother4Peace

(4,242 posts)
7. Putting out an opening statement will allow Comey to prepare for the attack: so far
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 08:49 PM
Jun 2017

we know the GOP is going to try and discredit him and claim Trump stupidity.

AnotherMother4Peace

(4,242 posts)
25. Another reason to put out an opening statement is to prevent a last minute Trump shut down
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 10:05 PM
Jun 2017

of his testimony. OR the thing that happened in the Michael Corleone senate hearings, when Pentangali's brother is brought over from Italy as an unspoken hostage. The Godfather...

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
8. And, apparently, Comey explained to the president that the FBI director position
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 08:49 PM
Jun 2017

was one that required independence. One of the talking heads mentioned that Comey told him on the first meeting.

trueblue2007

(17,205 posts)
10. so Trump can't complain and say he didn't know. HE WAS NOT IGNORANT. He knew.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 08:54 PM
Jun 2017

Because Comey told him ... he can't whine and cry ....."I didn't know"

wishstar

(5,268 posts)
11. That was a good observation she made about Trump criticizing Bill Clinton meeting Loretta Lynch
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 08:54 PM
Jun 2017

No way he didn't know it was inappropriate to try to influence the Flynn investigation.

Also Trump persisted for months trying to sway Comey even after Comey had told him at the first meeting that there was supposed to be distance and independence.

marybourg

(12,620 posts)
13. I don't think Jill Wine-Banks was ever an FBI Agent, but
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:13 PM
Jun 2017

she was a DOJ lawyer on the staff of special prosecutor Leon Jaworski during the Watergate scandal. In the proceedings before Judge John Sirica, she was responsible for cross-examining President of the United States Richard Nixon's secretary Rose Mary Woods about the 18-1/2 minute gap on the Watergate tapes. She showed that Wood's proffered explanation for how she "accidentally" erased that section of tape was impossible, garnering attention and acclaim.

In 1977, she was appointed General Counsel of the Army, by President Jimmy Carter, the first woman to hold that position. In that role she promulgated a rule forcing all Army hiring authorities to justify in writing the hiring of a male attorney, when a qualified female attorney had also applied for the position, thus opening up the ranks of Army lawyers to sizable numbers of females (including me, which is why I know this story) for the first time

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
15. I edited the thread title
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:23 PM
Jun 2017

Apparently I misread the crawl during the segment...it was enough of a task to capture and transcribe the conversation with clarity. So all is right with the world again.

marybourg

(12,620 posts)
16. Thank you for grabbing the story.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:27 PM
Jun 2017

It re-connected me with a person who doesn't know me, but who was my benefactor anyway.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
22. Chris Hayes, MSNBC, no link, I transcribed it, it's in my thread title
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:41 PM
Jun 2017

There's no link because it was on TV and I posted it about two minutes after they had the exchange.

MedusaX

(1,129 posts)
19. Ironic that the day *45 1st attempted to obstruct justice was same day WH counsel formally
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:36 PM
Jun 2017

established the communications protocol for all WH communications with members of DoJ.....

So every time *45 chose to interact directly with Comey, he chose to violate the official procedures established (in writing & dated on official WH letterhead) by his own counsel (McGahn).

What a pompous ass.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
24. The word "innocent" has been tossed around all night
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:45 PM
Jun 2017

I had CNN on earlier and it came up in a number of conversations.

A few people talking about "He's a successful CEO, that's just how he does things, he had no way of knowing."

No, he is not "innocent." He knew exactly what he was doing, and has gotten away with every transgression of ethics and decency in the past, so what's just one more goof, ya know? Just keep lying and eventually you'll wear out your opponents.

I'm really not looking forward to the Comey show tomorrow. The spin is going to be brutal.

LisaM

(27,801 posts)
40. Of course, he wasn't really a successful CEO, though that's beside the point.
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 01:15 PM
Jun 2017

How can anyone defend him on the basis of being unqualified for the job, or unaware of what it entails? And how can anyone who knows someone is unqualified vote for that person?

This isn't running for president of a high school class. This is one of the most important jobs in the world, and knowingly voting for an unqualified person is just wicked.

BSdetect

(8,998 posts)
26. The GOPers and drumpers are really going all out with their think tank talking points.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 10:23 PM
Jun 2017

Well nailed on this one.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
33. Saw it and loved it. The way she explained that there was no evidence
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 01:19 AM
Jun 2017

of Bill Clinton and Loretta lynch's discussion, which is something I've always noticed doesn't get brought up. Bill C is very chummy and verbose. They could have been talking about anything, grandkids, anything. I was glad to see her bring up the obvious fact there was no evidence rather than listening to the uninformed assumptions.

Thanks for this thread. She really set it up right there with all your points. Brilliant.

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
34. Saw Wine too & loved her perfunctory dismissal of Trump's 'ignorance"defense
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 01:36 AM
Jun 2017

Ignorance is already not a defense, but Wine definitely made it clear that Trump has publicly denounced a candidate's husband for talking to an FBI Director during an investigation...Trump knew it was wrong all nine times he did it.

lark

(23,091 posts)
37. The way he handled proves he knows he was doing wrong.
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:55 AM
Jun 2017

First, he mislead Comey on the nature of the dinner, why because he knew Comey would not want to be alone with him due to the investigation. He knew he was doing wrong and took steps to hide it.
2 - When he brought Comey in for a general meeting, he dismissed everyone but Comey. When Sessions tried to stay, Drumpf explicitly told him to leave. Again, he didn't want Sessions to hear what he was going to say because he knew he was doing something illegal.

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,110 posts)
41. Completely frustrating to be more equipped to govern than nearly the entire GOP.
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 02:45 PM
Jun 2017

They rely completely on the protection and cover of Fox News.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
42. No, no, no. He's knows it's wrong if the Clintons do it. If he does stuff, well, that's different.
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 03:19 PM
Jun 2017

If the Clintons cured cancer, he'd complain they did it to forward their evil agenda. If Trump causes cancer, Sean Spicer and Kelly Anne would try to spin it in a positive way. Meanwhile, Trump would say, "How can it be wrong? I'm Donald Trump. I'm President. Can you believe it? I'm President!"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jill Wine-Banks just nail...