Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,622 posts)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 07:14 PM Jun 2017

Muslim boys saved peoples lives: Ramadan early risers played key role in Grenfell Tower rescue

NOOR AL-SIBAI at Raw Story

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/muslim-boys-saved-peoples-lives-ramadan-early-risers-played-key-role-in-grenfell-tower-rescue/

"SNIP..............


Though it’s unclear who was first to notice the fire, Fusion reported that many Muslims who woke up before dawn to eat before fasting during daylight for Ramadan noticed the flames coming from the bottom floor of the building.

According to an unidentified Londoner who spoke to HuffPost UK, Muslims were leaving mosques for their early morning prayers to alert people to the fire.

“Muslim boys saved people’s lives. They ran around knocking on people’s doors. If it wasn’t for all these Muslims boys round here helping us, coming from mosques, people would have [died]…they were the first people with bags of water, giving to people. Helping people,” she told HuffPost. “Thank God for Ramadan.”

According to Zeinab Jafari, a London resident who lives near the towers, the fire either didn’t set off fire alarms, or the alarms were very faint.

...............SNIP"

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Muslim boys saved peoples lives: Ramadan early risers played key role in Grenfell Tower rescue (Original Post) applegrove Jun 2017 OP
Wow, that kind of brings tears to my eyes. LisaM Jun 2017 #1
Last night the TV panned over a couple waving frantically from an upper story window. procon Jun 2017 #2
I watched only antiseptic clips last night. Thank god. Vibes to one an all. applegrove Jun 2017 #4
More likely the evening meal Warpy Jun 2017 #3
That is terrifying. No fire alarms. applegrove Jun 2017 #9
It might not have been a huge problem until they put that stupid siding on Warpy Jun 2017 #10
Hopefully that will be the end of lax building codes. My parents lived applegrove Jun 2017 #13
Living units were around the outside, halls and stairwell were interior. Warpy Jun 2017 #14
The sprinklers in my parents place were inside the apartments too. applegrove Jun 2017 #18
That might have helped a bit Warpy Jun 2017 #19
True this. applegrove Jun 2017 #20
Not necessarily. They retrofitted in a full building heating system during the "rehab". politicat Jun 2017 #21
K&R ismnotwasm Jun 2017 #5
Yep this is everywhere malaise Jun 2017 #6
During Ramadan some of them pray all through the night and are awake all night. luvMIdog Jun 2017 #7
From the horror of the flames, shines the brighter light of compassion. democrank Jun 2017 #8
CBC was reporting the building had no fire alarms or sprinklers TrogL Jun 2017 #11
OMG ailsagirl Jun 2017 #12
It was low income housing in the middle of one of the richest boroughs killbotfactory Jun 2017 #15
I wonder what the redevelopment is going to look like? politicat Jun 2017 #22
There is just no excuse for that! montana_hazeleyes Jun 2017 #17
The excuse was that the building was built in 1974 Warpy Jun 2017 #23
This makes it all the more tragic. montana_hazeleyes Jun 2017 #24
it was horrible bdamomma Jun 2017 #16

procon

(15,805 posts)
2. Last night the TV panned over a couple waving frantically from an upper story window.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 07:22 PM
Jun 2017

There were flames all around them. I don't think they could have survived. The image is still stuck in my mind and I want to cry.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
3. More likely the evening meal
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 07:22 PM
Jun 2017

The fire started at 12:54 per BBC. Since sunset is late at London's latitude, likely the evening meal wasn't started until 10 PM. They'd have been awake and cleaning up at midnight, and not quite asleep at 1 AM. But yes, the Muslims were awake and alerted their neighbors. They were also among the first to provide aid like clothing, food, and sanitary stuff like diapers.

A bigger story than the fire is the massive generosity of people across the UK to the survivors.

ETA: There were no fire alarms. They weren't standard when the place was built in 1974.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
10. It might not have been a huge problem until they put that stupid siding on
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 09:15 PM
Jun 2017

with those triangular bump out bits that acted just like chimneys, spreading the fire upward very quickly.

You smell smoke, you close your metal door, put wet rags around it to stop any more smoke, and call the fire department. In concrete buildings, there's usually enough separation to keep people safe until they're rescued. Unfortunately, that didn't work for a fire that traveled outside the building and then laterally inside the building.

I shudder to think about how many people they're going to find when they can get in there.

applegrove

(118,622 posts)
13. Hopefully that will be the end of lax building codes. My parents lived
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 09:52 PM
Jun 2017

in a retirement home and they retrofitted all floors with an add on sprinkler system a few years ago. Very expensive but that is the law in Ontario. I don't think sprinklers would have been much help in the London case as the fire ran up the outside. I can't even think about what the victims went through. Too horrifying. Vibes to all the families.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
14. Living units were around the outside, halls and stairwell were interior.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:00 PM
Jun 2017

Sprinklers not only keep the fire from spreading into escape ways, but also cool off the superheated gases from the burning units.

They would have bought more time for people to get out once they saw the fire coming up the outside of the building.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
19. That might have helped a bit
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 11:37 PM
Jun 2017

but with the fire roaring up the outside, maybe not. In any case, full sprinkler systems would be prohibitively expensive to retrofit into a Council building. Corridor and stairwell sprinklers would be doable.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
21. Not necessarily. They retrofitted in a full building heating system during the "rehab".
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 11:58 PM
Jun 2017

Most full building heating systems are radiators, not forced air, because water retains heat better than air. They spent a lot of time drilling through the walls to run the piping.

Adding sprinklers to that system is trivial, maybe another 10% of the cost of the system. Pop-downs don't even have the exposed heads that are prone to getting swatted or having things hung off of them. When heat isn't needed, one turns off the boiler and let the water continue to circulate.

Of course, the heating system itself may have contributed to the spread, since they drilled through the concrete, which compromised the envelope, and modern radiators use pex (plastic) piping rather than copper or steel. If the lines are empty (for summer) that piping is just another line of fuel and a pathway for fire.

And one stairwell. In the center. Which becomes a chimney if even one fire door down low has to be held open to get people out.

But yes, the cladding. That's a highly probable cause.

malaise

(268,930 posts)
6. Yep this is everywhere
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 07:25 PM
Jun 2017

Some were on BBC asking for water, clothes and food for victims.

Most folks lost everything.

democrank

(11,092 posts)
8. From the horror of the flames, shines the brighter light of compassion.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 07:41 PM
Jun 2017

My heartfelt thanks to all those wonderful people who reached out to help.

TrogL

(32,822 posts)
11. CBC was reporting the building had no fire alarms or sprinklers
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 09:36 PM
Jun 2017

Residents had been complaining for years.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
15. It was low income housing in the middle of one of the richest boroughs
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:00 PM
Jun 2017

The rich borough residents didn't want them there, and the residents felt like that is the reason their pleas were being ignored.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/06/grenfell-tower-fire-inequality-housing

politicat

(9,808 posts)
22. I wonder what the redevelopment is going to look like?
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 11:59 PM
Jun 2017

And who is going to profit?

It's not like strategic fires haven't been used before.

montana_hazeleyes

(3,424 posts)
17. There is just no excuse for that!
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:05 PM
Jun 2017

How in hell not to have alarms or sprinklers in a high rise housing families. It should have been done, required or not. This is so devastating and horrific.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
23. The excuse was that the building was built in 1974
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 12:44 AM
Jun 2017

and designed in such a way as to be fireproof with the original Stalinist exterior and units sealed off from each other. If they'd left well enough alone, that refrigerator (or whatever caught fire) would have been confined to one flat. As it was, fire shot up the exterior and it was all over with no alarms, no sprinklers, and walls and floors compromised to allow interior spread.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Muslim boys saved peoples...