General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat NBC's Alex Jones Interview Says About Megyn Kelly
The thing about marriages of convenience is that the people in them are frequently inconvenienced. That's what happens when you put money over compatibility and shared values, assuming values are even present to begin with. Sooner or later, someone is going to embarrass someone.
Megyn Kelly's interview last night with unhinged conspiracy peddler Alex Jones threatened to be one of those times, especially coming on heels of her softball sit-down with Vladimir Putin. The backlash, as such things always seem to be now, was fierce and preemptive. Kelly was accused of "normalizing" Jones, the man responsible for such timeless postulates as 9/11 was an inside job, Sandy Hook was a hoax and Democrats ran a child sex ring out of a D.C. pizza joint. Advertisers dropped out. A Connecticut affiliate refused to air the show. The Sandy Hook Promise gala fundraiser coordinators disinvited Kelly as their host.
NBC took the point. As the network reportedly scrambled to re-edit the interview, Jones released a tape of his pre-show conversation with Kelly, in which she expressed her desire to make their sit-down "fun" and show "the left" another side of his execrable personality. She also promised not to make him into "some kind of bogeyman." By the time it aired, the interview had been transformed into a sober warning on the dangers of letting liars have platforms. Kelly introduced Jones as "a radical conspiracy theorist" and a liar. She acknowledged the backlash upfront, saying, "Some thought we shouldn't broadcast this interview because his baseless allegations aren't just offensive, they're dangerous." She then justified the broadcast by pointing out that "Alex Jones isn't going away" and his audience is only getting bigger, emboldened by the open support of the president, who has consistently praised Jones and appears to rely on him for information echoing things the radio host says in his own speeches, granting InfoWars a temporary White House press pass and recently including a link to one of the site's articles in an email to staff.
Framed this way as a report on the dangerous liar who has the ear of the president the segment felt relevant, even slyly subversive. After all, to shed light on Alex Jones's operation, which she summed up as "garbage in, garbage out" is to shed light on Trump's inner world. And given how low the expectations and how loud the alarm, the whole thing came off as rather anticlimactically level-headed and justified. The segment was capped by a Tom Brokaw essay on the breakdown of civil discourse on the Internet, and what are we to do. Perhaps the most interesting thing about the interview was how the whole thing functioned like an ouroboros of for-profit news media, closing the bottom-line circle by eating its own tail. The resulting piece was a marvel of having your cake, eating it, too, and covering your ass after having had your fill.
http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/news/what-nbcs-alex-jones-interview-says-about-megyn-kelly-w488564?utm_source=rsnewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=daily&utm_campaign=061917_15
Squinch
(50,949 posts)achieve that goal.
She is willing to use dead six-year-olds and their grieving parents to further her career.
She is a pig and I will never watch her.
brush
(53,771 posts)There's a more earthier euphemism for that.
Were her years of right wing spew on FOX was just for the money too?
Guess the payee assumes whatever positions the payer demands.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)I did and she ragged on him constantly. Flat out called him a liar, she did.
It can be argued that giving him a platform is giving him respectability, but he's already getting that with PRESIDENTIAL ACCEPTANCE.
He's no longer some fringe asshole-- the President of the US is giving this guy a microphone, so what's the problem with another microphone calling out his bullshit?
tblue37
(65,336 posts)imagine it was not that hard-hitting.
melman
(7,681 posts)Obviously not. Because if you had you would know it acknowledges how hard she was on him.
dembotoz
(16,799 posts)and thats the way it is
Best_man23
(4,898 posts)A RW Hack on Faux, a RW Hack on NBC
dalton99a
(81,455 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Willing to give her a few months to adjust.