Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 01:48 PM Jun 2017

Using Contraception Could Soon Cost You Your Job In Missouri

Using Contraception Could Soon Cost You Your Job In Missouri
By Natalie Dailey on June 19, 2017

Under this new Republican regime, reproductive rights are taking a hit left and right. Many states are limiting abortion rights and access to birth control. Women in Missouri may be facing another setback in their reproductive rights.

The Senate in Missouri just passed a bill that would legally allow hiring managers to discriminate against women who use birth control or women who have had abortions. The law also requires abortion clinics to meet the same standards as outpatient surgery centers.

Governor Eric Greitens said:

“We want to protect life. We want to defend life, and we want to promote a culture of life here in the state of Missouri.”

Currently, the state bans employers from discriminating against these women. However, this new law would repeal it.

http://www.liberalamerica.org/2017/06/19/using-contraception-soon-cost-job-missouri/

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Using Contraception Could Soon Cost You Your Job In Missouri (Original Post) workinclasszero Jun 2017 OP
and the war on women continues to escalate! niyad Jun 2017 #1
Republican sharia law workinclasszero Jun 2017 #2
that is my question to the ones screaming about sharia --what the FUCK is the difference between niyad Jun 2017 #3
Jeebus? Eliot Rosewater Jun 2017 #4
But..but... workinclasszero Jun 2017 #9
There is no difference workinclasszero Jun 2017 #5
sadly, your post is absolutely correct. the only difference between them and sharia is niyad Jun 2017 #7
Has there ever been a religion of any kind with total political and civil power workinclasszero Jun 2017 #14
cannot think of any offhand. niyad Jun 2017 #15
Me either workinclasszero Jun 2017 #18
As a seminary student myself liberalhistorian Jun 2017 #25
It is more like they are trying to shove... 3catwoman3 Jun 2017 #31
a most excellent point. niyad Jun 2017 #34
Republican Jesus controlling women. sarcasmo Jun 2017 #19
Are they going to "promote a culture of life" by giving women paid time off to take care of all Coventina Jun 2017 #6
No because as soon as the baby is born workinclasszero Jun 2017 #20
& the obv question is: Jacquette Jun 2017 #8
How are they not going to discriminate in hiring knowing the state is promoting pregnancy like this? bettyellen Jun 2017 #11
This is a violation of HIPAA REP Jun 2017 #10
How in hell would they know? cwydro Jun 2017 #12
You're married, and haven't gotten pregnant in awhile. Ilsa Jun 2017 #33
Include Viagra zipplewrath Jun 2017 #13
What is the name or bill number of this bill? WillowTree Jun 2017 #16
If you work for Hobby Lobby maybe. leftyladyfrommo Jun 2017 #17
I don't know . . . gratuitous Jun 2017 #21
Which employer prefers their group plan to deal with pregnancies & maternal leave over ecstatic Jun 2017 #22
Er, HIPAA privacy? JenniferJuniper Jun 2017 #23
And people ALWAYS think Kansas has the most NUT JOB Republicans..... NOPE Bengus81 Jun 2017 #24
I've been accused more than once of being verbose and loquacious, but... MANative Jun 2017 #26
If they can discriminate on this basis (which seems illegal) - what about other legal procedures? LisaM Jun 2017 #27
So, how will they know? liberalhistorian Jun 2017 #28
Uh, folks, you need to start weeding out real news from fake news. You have been had. tonyt53 Jun 2017 #29
Republican hate women .......... Angry Dragon Jun 2017 #30
There must be enough women that hate women... 3catwoman3 Jun 2017 #32

niyad

(113,275 posts)
3. that is my question to the ones screaming about sharia --what the FUCK is the difference between
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 01:52 PM
Jun 2017

Last edited Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:07 PM - Edit history (1)

them, and you reichwing religious whack jobs shoving your patriarchal, antiquated belief systems down our political throats?

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
4. Jeebus?
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 01:56 PM
Jun 2017

Not sure what the difference is, myself.

The problem is our country was founded on NOT acknowledging religion, any religion.

The darlings on the right are confused on this one.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
9. But..but...
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:04 PM
Jun 2017

White Mormon Jesus himself handed down our constitution to the mostly unbelieving/atheist/deist founding fathers in person, don't you know?! (Fake news alert!)

Here's a pic to prove it!








 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
5. There is no difference
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 01:57 PM
Jun 2017

And I'm telling you this as a believer in Jesus.

The fake news republican jesus cult will burn us unbelievers at the stake just as quick as ISIS if given the power and they are dangerous close to having that power under their cult leader tRump and his damned party.

niyad

(113,275 posts)
7. sadly, your post is absolutely correct. the only difference between them and sharia is
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 01:59 PM
Jun 2017

how far they have gone so far. once in completely control--the burning times will be nothing compared to what they will install.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
14. Has there ever been a religion of any kind with total political and civil power
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:21 PM
Jun 2017

that didn't murder their political opponents in the name of God?

There is a damn good reason for separation of church and state which many ignorant Americans may be learning the hard way, soon.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
18. Me either
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:39 PM
Jun 2017

It's always been a horror show of innocents bloodshed, torture and death.

And its well on the way in Twitler's Amerika.

liberalhistorian

(20,817 posts)
25. As a seminary student myself
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 03:00 PM
Jun 2017

(at a liberal, progressive, social-justice-oriented, pro-LGTB, pro-choice institution) I couldn't agree more. It's truly frightening. Several of our professors have been sounding this alarm for a long time and are now truly alarmed at the level of power these dangerous fundie theocrats have.

3catwoman3

(23,973 posts)
31. It is more like they are trying to shove...
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 03:42 PM
Jun 2017

...their patriarchal, antiquated belief systems UP a different body part.

They can all go to hell.

Coventina

(27,105 posts)
6. Are they going to "promote a culture of life" by giving women paid time off to take care of all
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 01:57 PM
Jun 2017

their babies?

No? I didn't think so.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
20. No because as soon as the baby is born
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:47 PM
Jun 2017

"Pro-life" republicans could care less if it dies of hunger in a ditch with no health care or shelter.

MAGA baby!

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
11. How are they not going to discriminate in hiring knowing the state is promoting pregnancy like this?
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:07 PM
Jun 2017

REP

(21,691 posts)
10. This is a violation of HIPAA
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:05 PM
Jun 2017

Employers and landlords have no right to your medical records or to ask you about your medical history; you have no duty to answer or answer truthfully when asked such questions.

This bill will cost the State of Missouri at lot of money to defend and they will lose.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
33. You're married, and haven't gotten pregnant in awhile.
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 03:53 PM
Jun 2017

You must be using birth control!

You could always spout off something about NFP, if you're worried the boss is getting too close.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,868 posts)
17. If you work for Hobby Lobby maybe.
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:36 PM
Jun 2017

Work places here aren't that repressive. Most Catholic women have been using birth control for years.

I don't know about the super right wingers.You just have to stay away from those companies. Most people wouldn't want to work there anywsy. It isn't a good work environment for non right wingers. And there are way more conventional companies here anyway.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
21. I don't know . . .
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:49 PM
Jun 2017

Sometimes the only way to find out how hard it's raining is to close up the umbrella. Right now, with legal restrictions in place, most work places wouldn't dare discriminate in this way. But once the legislature grants them permission to start nosing around in their employees' personal lives, how many are going to have a sudden uptick in their interest in employees' medical treatment? Especially when the employee is one of those uppity women?

Hard to square their claimed "culture of life" philosophy with a law that stops people from earning a living, but I'm not a Republican.

ecstatic

(32,688 posts)
22. Which employer prefers their group plan to deal with pregnancies & maternal leave over
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:55 PM
Jun 2017

birth control and/or abortions? It makes zero sense from a financial perspective. It's one of those scenarios that only happens in a rethug's imagination (much like their bathroom laws, etc.).

Bengus81

(6,931 posts)
24. And people ALWAYS think Kansas has the most NUT JOB Republicans..... NOPE
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 02:56 PM
Jun 2017

Look at Oklahoma,now this BS in Missouri.......

MANative

(4,112 posts)
26. I've been accused more than once of being verbose and loquacious, but...
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 03:00 PM
Jun 2017

there are no words sufficient to describe my rage over other people trying to dictate reproductive and/or health choices of others.


LisaM

(27,803 posts)
27. If they can discriminate on this basis (which seems illegal) - what about other legal procedures?
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 03:03 PM
Jun 2017

Could they base hiring on whether someone has had a gastric bypass? A nose job? A vasectomy?

And, it violates privacy laws. So if they waste their time passing this nonsense, they will waste a lot more defending it in the courts.

liberalhistorian

(20,817 posts)
28. So, how will they know?
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 03:05 PM
Jun 2017

Unless you submit an insurance claim for contraception or abortion, how will they find out? Send the "pregnancy police" to every female employee's doctor every month or something, or force them to undergo monthly exams, like they did in Romania under Coucesciu (spelling), or as they do in many Central and Latin American countries now? WTF? Shit, I shouldn't be giving them any ideas.

That's the insidious thing, though. Women who can afford to pay for contraception and abortion without insurance likely won't have to worry about it. But those who can't will, as usual, be railroaded and discriminated against. And an awful lot of even employed, even middle-class women can't afford those on their own without insurance.

I don't want to hear another word from these fuckers about "Sharia Law".

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
29. Uh, folks, you need to start weeding out real news from fake news. You have been had.
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 03:07 PM
Jun 2017

Little thing called HIPAA prevents this from happening. It isn't state law, it is federal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Using Contraception Could...