Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 08:25 AM Jun 2017

Here's the Bloomberg article on Trump and Russian money Rachel mentioned last night.

Trump, Russia and a Shadowy Business Partnership
An insider describes the Bayrock Group, its links to the Trump family and its mysterious access to funds. It isn't pretty.



https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-06-21/trump-russia-and-those-shadowy-sater-deals-at-bayrock

But that doesn't address national security and other problems that might arise for the president if Russia is involved in Trump, either through potentially compromising U.S. business relationships or through funds that flowed into his wallet years ago. In that context, a troubling history of Trump's dealings with Russians exists outside of Russia: in a dormant real-estate development firm, the Bayrock Group, which once operated just two floors beneath the president's own office in Trump Tower.

Bayrock partnered with the future president and his two eldest children, Donald Jr. and Ivanka, on a series of real-estate deals between 2002 and about 2011, the most prominent being the troubled Trump Soho hotel and condominium in Manhattan.

During the years that Bayrock and Trump did deals together, the company was also a bridge between murky European funding and a number of projects in the U.S. to which the president once leant his name in exchange for handsome fees. Icelandic banks that dealt with Bayrock, for example, were easy marks for money launderers and foreign influence, according to interviews with government investigators, legislators, and others in Reykjavik, Brussels, Paris and London. Trump testified under oath in a 2007 deposition that Bayrock brought Russian investors to his Trump Tower office to discuss deals in Moscow, and said he was pondering investing there.

***

One of Bayrock's principals was a career criminal named Felix Sater who had ties to Russian and American organized crime groups. Before linking up with the company and with Trump, he had worked as a mob informant for the U.S. government, fled to Moscow to avoid criminal charges while boasting of his KGB and Kremlin contacts there, and had gone to prison for slashing apart another man’s face with a broken cocktail glass.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's the Bloomberg article on Trump and Russian money Rachel mentioned last night. (Original Post) Miles Archer Jun 2017 OP
They look swarmy Sanity Claws Jun 2017 #1
That's because they are. shraby Jun 2017 #5
They act untouchable.... BlueJac Jun 2017 #2
Wow - that will go a long way to ....nothing. jmg257 Jun 2017 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author jmg257 Jun 2017 #4
Well this is what you get when you want a businessman for a politician. gordianot Jun 2017 #6
This is much more critical IMO PDittie Jun 2017 #7

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
3. Wow - that will go a long way to ....nothing.
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 09:10 AM
Jun 2017

Old news getting new light...of a NYC real estate & casino businessman who does shady deals, and has shady ties to shady banks and shady characters, even internationally!

Response to Miles Archer (Original post)

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
6. Well this is what you get when you want a businessman for a politician.
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 09:44 AM
Jun 2017

As Smedly Butler said "a racket" and in this case a foreign state sponsored racket to boot whose purpose is domination.

PDittie

(8,322 posts)
7. This is much more critical IMO
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 09:45 AM
Jun 2017

than the "Russians hacked the election".

This is why he won't release his tax returns. He is compromised, and not just in an 'emoluments' kind of way. If someone at the IRS or his accounting firm or anyone with ready access to them will take the risk -- and I feel certain it's at pain of death -- of leaking his tax returns ... he's done.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's the Bloomberg arti...