Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 02:44 PM Jun 2017

Missouri Advances Bill Allowing Employers to Fire Women for Using Birth Control

Missouri Advances Bill Allowing Employers to Fire Women for Using Birth Control
Posted on Jun 23, 2017

On Tuesday, the Missouri House of Representatives voted in favor of Senate Bill 5, which would modify statewide provisions relating to abortion. Changes would affect local abortion policies, tissue reports, employee disclosure policies and abortion facility inspections.

Pitched as an expansion of religious freedom for employers and landlords, the bill would overturn a St. Louis city ordinance that prevented discrimination against women who have had abortions. The new law would allow employers to fire female employees for having had abortions or using birth control. It would extend the privilege of discrimination to landlords, who could evict women for getting an abortion, getting pregnant out of wedlock or using birth control.

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/missouri_passes_bill_allowing_employers_20170622

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri Advances Bill Allowing Employers to Fire Women for Using Birth Control (Original Post) workinclasszero Jun 2017 OP
The handmaid tale joeybee12 Jun 2017 #1
Certainly. Dawson Leery Jun 2017 #2
That is exactly where the republican party wants us to be Matthew28 Jun 2017 #18
kick Dawson Leery Jun 2017 #3
Why would an employer even care? GoCubsGo Jun 2017 #4
It will prbably go to court ASAP loyalsister Jun 2017 #8
We should make sure that the ones that do and try to restrict women's rights Blue_true Jun 2017 #21
What would a dick do? Initech Jun 2017 #5
This is only fair if employers do the same for men: Ilsa Jun 2017 #6
+1 lunasun Jun 2017 #33
WTF? Is this legal in this country? smirkymonkey Jun 2017 #7
Republicans are religious fascist Matthew28 Jun 2017 #19
IMO, Women need to go on a "sex strike". roamer65 Jun 2017 #9
FFS, can people stop with this dumb idea? LeftyMom Jun 2017 #12
No one suggested women stop having sex. Persisted Jun 2017 #17
Uh, you do know that for the majority of women it's the same thing? LeftyMom Jun 2017 #20
Right. Let's pretend most women don't masturbate. Let's Persisted Jun 2017 #24
. roamer65 Jun 2017 #35
Wrong finger. Or maybe not, lol. nt Persisted Jun 2017 #36
LMAO. roamer65 Jun 2017 #37
I'm just curious. How, exactly, would an employer know if an employee was on birth control? Vinca Jun 2017 #10
That comes next, undoubtedly. Aristus Jun 2017 #13
Attempt at a crosspost from the Missouri group: Sinistrous Jun 2017 #11
Does this cover guys using condoms? jpak Jun 2017 #14
Someone should film men buying condoms and then threaten to out them- just to show how ridiculous bettyellen Jun 2017 #28
unconstitutional Takket Jun 2017 #15
First thing I thought Egnever Jun 2017 #16
Republicans pass these bills hoping one slips past the Courts. Blue_true Jun 2017 #22
You mean the Court that threw out edhopper Jun 2017 #34
Can someone please post a link to the text of this bill? WillowTree Jun 2017 #23
You'd think the employers prefer their workers not to get pregnant Ron Obvious Jun 2017 #25
I guess it's about employer options.. defacto7 Jun 2017 #26
Western Sharia Law tenderfoot Jun 2017 #27
Pence's VP debate comments scared the hell out of me . He pretty much envisioned this for lunasun Jun 2017 #29
He wants a christian Matthew28 Jun 2017 #31
And women will bear babies for the less fortunate ! Praise yeezus lunasun Jun 2017 #32
Norma Rae (Crystal Lee Sutton) we have failed you n/t FormerOstrich Jun 2017 #30
How would they know you had an abortion blueinredohio Jun 2017 #38

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
8. It will prbably go to court ASAP
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:07 PM
Jun 2017

and be found unconstitutional. The legislature is doing this to piss off STL which passed an antidiscrimination ordinance that this bill will undo. It's petty and will give credentials to the "prolife" legislators and especially the governor. He used to be a Democrat and they are helping to scrub the prochoice brand off of his resume.

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
6. This is only fair if employers do the same for men:
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:05 PM
Jun 2017

having sex for any resason other than procreation. The women they fire should be able to name the men and expect them to lose their jobs, housing, etc. It's part of MY religion, after all.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
7. WTF? Is this legal in this country?
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:05 PM
Jun 2017

Can this stand? I am watching the 21st century disappear before my eyes and I feel like I am going mad.

Matthew28

(1,796 posts)
19. Republicans are religious fascist
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 06:09 PM
Jun 2017

They won't be happy until we're living in the 15th century and anyone that dares step out of line is hung.

We're watching the death of freedom and people keep voting republican.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
12. FFS, can people stop with this dumb idea?
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:22 PM
Jun 2017

Sex isn't a favor women dole out to men. Rumor has it we like it too, and it's just as important to our emotional well-being, ability to build and maintain healthy relationships, etc.

Vinca

(50,236 posts)
10. I'm just curious. How, exactly, would an employer know if an employee was on birth control?
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:13 PM
Jun 2017

Do they do home inspections of medicine cabinets or demand an inspection of an IUD string?

Aristus

(66,286 posts)
13. That comes next, undoubtedly.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:37 PM
Jun 2017

Henry Ford used to have company inspectors break into Ford employee's houses and search the premises for anything Ford might find 'objectionable'. I don't think that word was ever properly defined in the corporate by-laws. But if Ford didn't like something, anything, that was turned up in the search, the employee was fired.

That's the kind of country the vicious Ayn Rand-worshippers want...

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
28. Someone should film men buying condoms and then threaten to out them- just to show how ridiculous
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 07:21 PM
Jun 2017

this is.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
16. First thing I thought
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:59 PM
Jun 2017

This couldn't possibly stand up in court.

One wonders if some of these legislatures even consider the constitution when writing these things.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
22. Republicans pass these bills hoping one slips past the Courts.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 06:36 PM
Jun 2017

Republicans attack Judges because they want cowered Judges that rubber stamp their bills and ignore the Constitution.

edhopper

(33,479 posts)
34. You mean the Court that threw out
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 08:35 PM
Jun 2017

the Voting Rights Act and whose newest member is a proponent of Religious Liberty?

That Court?

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
23. Can someone please post a link to the text of this bill?
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 06:45 PM
Jun 2017

I've searched and searched and the only text I can find for SB 5 for this session has nothing to do with abortion or birth control. There's and SB 67 that proposes changes to Missouri's laws applying to abortion facilities, but that's all. Yet every reference to these draconian provisions mentions SB 5, which doesn't seem to apply.

I'd just really like to see what such a ridiculous bill actually says, but I can't find it.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
25. You'd think the employers prefer their workers not to get pregnant
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 06:51 PM
Jun 2017

I'll never understand this mindset, nor for that matter do I understand the opposition of corporate America to single payer healthcare which would be a tremendous convenience for them as well as keeping their workers healthy enough to work without having to administer an insurance programme.

I suppose the dogma (religion, free market) triumphs over common sense capitalism. Bizarre.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
26. I guess it's about employer options..
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 07:19 PM
Jun 2017

They can get rid of workers for getting pregnant as well as for trying not to get pregnant. The idea is how to keep women from having sex for any other reason than corporate admissible procreation. That's all I can make out of it.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
29. Pence's VP debate comments scared the hell out of me . He pretty much envisioned this for
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 08:04 PM
Jun 2017

Americas future

Matthew28

(1,796 posts)
31. He wants a christian
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 08:09 PM
Jun 2017

Saudi Arabia when it comes to social issues.

We'll of course be even worse economically.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Missouri Advances Bill Al...