Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Maddow is talking about the tick tick tick tweets of Ben Wittes,
of the Lawfare blog.
Every time he TICKS another story comes out. And he's ticking again. He's been ticking for days.
What does he know NOW????
What does Rachel know????
Guess we'll find out.
ON EDIT: He finally said BOOM! And linked to the WSJ story, "GOP operative sought Clinton emails from hackers ..."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 6432 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow is talking about the tick tick tick tweets of Ben Wittes, (Original Post)
pnwmom
Jun 2017
OP
I don't think so. This is a WSJ report, and the suppressed story was something the
pnwmom
Jun 2017
#4
elleng
(130,869 posts)1. "Tick" guy retiring,
after his last one today started a few days ago.
'WSJ - Repug hackers sought Clinton e.mails.'
BumRushDaShow
(128,896 posts)2. Was going to go to bed and listen to it on SiriusXM
but you made me turn the TV on.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)3. Is this the "blockbuster" that the USG wanted suppressed?
Because if it is...well...I'm a little underwhelmed.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)4. I don't think so. This is a WSJ report, and the suppressed story was something the
Washington Post had.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)5. The OP, on edit, indicates the WSJ article was the BOOM per Wittes
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)6. Right. But that doesn't make it the suppressed story. There have been lots of big stories,
but the WSJ one was the one Wittes was pointing to.
Catmusicfan
(816 posts)7. OMG this is freaking amazing!
Gothmog
(145,152 posts)8. Rachel did a great job on this story