General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAirport Security: you can't be too careful about pesto...
The rule against carrying larger liquids through a security checkpoint is nearing its 11th birthday (thanks, underwear bomber!) and to many travelers, it remains both bizarre and annoying. It is even harder to reconcile as the number of exceptions, mostly for medical reasons, grows.
The risk of carrying these larger containers through the checkpoint is mitigated thanks to the use of newer scanner systems that can verify the contents. So, why not use these scanners for everything? Like many things it is all about money. New scanners are expensive and adjusting the passenger flow through security lines to handle screening all the bottles would slow things down or require increased staffing. That all adds up to reasons or excuses to skip the idea, unless you happen to be in Genoa, Italy.
The local airport authority teamed up with a local charity, Flying Angels, and the security crew to allow containers of pesto up to 500g through the checkpoint, subject to additional screening and payment of a fee. The fee is treated as a donation to Flying Angels and earns the passenger a sticker for their pesto container. At the security checkpoint the stickered tub is scanned in the specialized machine and, because it is a condiment and not a security risk, allowed on to the plane.
This is great, of course, for the passengers bringing home a souvenir and willing to pay the extra euro to do so. But if it can be done here and at an almost reasonable price that furthers the view that the issue is more about money than anything else. And now more than a decade on the fact that airports and governments have chosen to not invest some of the billions paid by passengers in security screening fees in things like this to cure pain points is most unfortunate.
https://runwaygirlnetwork.com/2017/07/02/airport-security-theatre-a-play-in-two-parts/
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)Most of the wealthy folks have their own private jets, and probably don't have to worry about having their liquids confiscated.
Of Course it's all about money. They would rather inconvenience millions, than spend their hardly earned profits on machines which would make the idiotic rules obsolete.
My last incident they took a container of pudding I had bought in Manhattan, intending to eat on the flight home. Can't be too careful where pudding is concerned, even if I did have it in a container with the restaurant's name and a receipt. Perhaps I mixed TNT with it.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)There will be no end to the horror.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)put it in your checked luggage, wrapped in clothing? I don't get it. Why would you want to carry a jar of pesto on the plane? Frankly, if you're returning from a trip to Italy, you probably have a bag of laundry in your checked bag anyhow. Put the double-bagged jar in with it and forget about it. It'll get home OK and, even if it breaks, it won't mess up everything.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)The airlines now charge for bags, and there are many who don't want to check them for that reason, or perhaps they don't want to wait around an extra 20 minutes at baggage claim once they arrive.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)I don't think so. Tourists traveling internationally generally do check a bag or two. It's hard to travel with just a carry-on and enjoy that kind of trip. But, you may know better than I do. I haven't done any international travel for some time.
brooklynite
(94,499 posts)...unless I'm bringing wine home. With Global Entry, I can be out of Arrivals in 5 minutes.
pansypoo53219
(20,969 posts)denmark. best bread i ever had. i did pack as much bakery tho. best souvenir? multi pack box of matches.