General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRick Perry gamely tries to explain 'supply and demand,' but fails
Speaking at a coal-fired power plant in Maidsville, W.Va., on Thursday, Energy Secretary Rick Perry made a strange argument about supply and demand, seeming to confuse the relationship between two of the essential forces in the economy.
"Here's a little economics lesson: supply and demand," Perry said, according to Taylor Kuykendall of Standard and Poor's. "You put the supply out there, and demand will follow."
If Perry was suggesting that no matter how much coal the industry produces, there will be demand for it, he was clearly mistaken. Of course, demand for coal -- or any other item -- is not infinite. People will only buy so much of it at a given price, and producers will only be able to sell more if they bring down the price.
Another possible interpretation of Perry's odd remark is that he might have been repeating a theory that was once widely accepted among economists. On this theory, demand and supply will always be in balance across the economy as a whole. These days, however, many economists view this logic as deeply and dangerously mistaken.
Read more: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-rick-perry-supply-and-demand-20170706-story.html

Blues Heron
(6,630 posts)Mine it and they will come?
Locrian
(4,523 posts)The second reason is to show that, despite economists assertions to the contrary, it cannot be proved that a market economy will necessarily maximise social welfare, as, even on their own terms, it is logically possible to have multiple equilibria, some of which are more socially desirable.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)And it has been GrOPer dogma since Ronny Raygun. It's why the GrOPers are such failure in economic policy.
Gothmog
(160,236 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)Supply-side economics is the Gospel he has helped preach for decades, and of course it turns out that he doesn't undertand it.