Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 07:39 PM Jul 2017

On CNN, legal ethics guy Richard Painter says what Uday (or Qusay) did

by attending the meeting with the Russian lawyer could actually be treason if he went there for the purpose of getting information about the Clinton campaign that was obtained illegally by the Russians. He says there are other explanations but that could be one of them.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On CNN, legal ethics guy Richard Painter says what Uday (or Qusay) did (Original Post) The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 OP
First you have to find someone to do something about it blueinredohio Jul 2017 #1
True, unfortunately. Let's hope Mueller's investigation leads somewhere The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #3
Thats also assuming any of the witnesses are still alive as Putin does tend to cstanleytech Jul 2017 #17
He's slamming him (and he worked for Bush). BigmanPigman Jul 2017 #2
Yes, very stiff, elleng Jul 2017 #5
He's been very adamant about the general awfulness The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #6
He had/has Bell's Palsy Hassin Bin Sober Jul 2017 #7
OK, that explains it. I wondered whether there was some kind of The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #8
He reminds me of Clutch Cargo. QED Jul 2017 #10
I never saw this...spot on comparison. BigmanPigman Jul 2017 #11
OMG - that's what my husband calls him! calimary Jul 2017 #15
If you watch carefully, only one... 3catwoman3 Jul 2017 #13
I volunteer to pull the hangman's lever...no charge. Moostache Jul 2017 #4
Richard Painter has been raising hell about these mobsters for i don't know how long now - Leghorn21 Jul 2017 #9
Who has the authority to arrest jr? I really have no idea. pangaia Jul 2017 #21
Oh damn, pangaia - great question, which anyone else, no doubt, can answer (just not me!) Leghorn21 Jul 2017 #23
FBI, probably. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #24
Many thanks, Ocelot! n/t Leghorn21 Jul 2017 #26
Thanks..shall i call the FBI and report a case of possible espionage.? pangaia Jul 2017 #28
I think they're onto it... The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #30
Really? I'm a little slow. pangaia Jul 2017 #31
Well, there's this super huge investigation going on, The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #32
That i know about. pangaia Jul 2017 #33
Please note Ocelot's reply, p: FBI most likely - eom Leghorn21 Jul 2017 #27
He's also part of one of the suits against Trump for violating the emoluments clause csziggy Jul 2017 #29
They need to remove Trump from office Mr.Bill Jul 2017 #12
Mook Junior is going to have to lawyer up too... Thomas Hurt Jul 2017 #14
I wonder if any legal exposure for going to the meeting about stolen goods MiddleClass Jul 2017 #16
what's ridiculous about this whole thing certainot Jul 2017 #18
Treason requires making war on the United States DefenseLawyer Jul 2017 #19
Painter is a law professor so I don't think he's just pulling that opinion The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #20
He is very respected and his commentary always seems well-reasoned. Glimmer of Hope Jul 2017 #22
I'm having trouble keeping the Trumpettes' nicknames straight. Fozzledick Jul 2017 #25

cstanleytech

(26,281 posts)
17. Thats also assuming any of the witnesses are still alive as Putin does tend to
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 09:31 PM
Jul 2017

take care of people he considers as potential problems in permanent ways.

BigmanPigman

(51,584 posts)
2. He's slamming him (and he worked for Bush).
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 07:46 PM
Jul 2017

When will the currently employed Repubs, and not just the same former employees, speak out and tell the truth too...it IS TREASON!

Doesn't that guy look very stiff whenever he speaks...only his mouth moves. Just an observation.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
6. He's been very adamant about the general awfulness
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 07:50 PM
Jul 2017

and criminality of the Trump administration. He does have an odd way of speaking - he's a professor at the U. of Minn. law school and I think I'd find him kind of hard to listen to, though I suppose I'd get used to him. He might be pretty interesting. He teaches courses in professional responsibility and securities regulation. https://www.law.umn.edu/profiles/richard-w-painter

QED

(2,747 posts)
10. He reminds me of Clutch Cargo.
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 08:09 PM
Jul 2017

His analyses are right on.

In case you're too young to know who Clutch Cargo is/was:

calimary

(81,220 posts)
15. OMG - that's what my husband calls him!
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 09:06 PM
Jul 2017

Richard Painter reminds me of Clutch Cargo, too!

He spoke the "T-word" today. For sure. It's the first time I've heard anybody of any credibility or heft or legitimacy dare to say "TREASON".

3catwoman3

(23,973 posts)
13. If you watch carefully, only one...
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 08:18 PM
Jul 2017

...side of his mouth moves. I think it is the left side that moves. See the Bell's palsy comment a few posts above.

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
4. I volunteer to pull the hangman's lever...no charge.
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 07:47 PM
Jul 2017

Treason must be punished and I am willing to do my part for God and Country.

Leghorn21

(13,524 posts)
9. Richard Painter has been raising hell about these mobsters for i don't know how long now -
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 08:03 PM
Jul 2017

- he's on MSNBC now then and just hammers home his points with a ferocity that is spellbinding.

He's after this cabal with a vengeance.

Be well (and...safe), Mr. Painter!

Leghorn21

(13,524 posts)
23. Oh damn, pangaia - great question, which anyone else, no doubt, can answer (just not me!)
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 10:38 PM
Jul 2017

HELLO!!?

ANYBODY!!!: Who comes knockin on this punk's door right around 4am??

Thank you in advance for your reply!
(seriously)

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
31. Really? I'm a little slow.
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 11:53 PM
Jul 2017

Without du and folks like you I'd be clueless.
Some days I have hope.
Other days I feel it is all over..mostly the latter.

Thanks.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
32. Well, there's this super huge investigation going on,
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 11:59 PM
Jul 2017

headed up by Bob Mueller and some of the best criminal lawyers in the country. I kind of have a hunch the FBI was aware of this long before it turned up on the news.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
33. That i know about.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 12:24 AM
Jul 2017

In fact most that is going on,, thanks to here..
Even my AG,,Schniederman...the hammer...😎

Mr.Bill

(24,282 posts)
12. They need to remove Trump from office
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 08:18 PM
Jul 2017

before they go after the kids. Otherwise he will just pardon them.

I dare say if they are found to have committed treason, Pence will not pardon them.

MiddleClass

(888 posts)
16. I wonder if any legal exposure for going to the meeting about stolen goods
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 09:07 PM
Jul 2017

Or even endorsing/expressing interest in the products of a illegal seizure.

Maybe those much smarter than I legal experts on here can offer some guidance?

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
18. what's ridiculous about this whole thing
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 09:37 PM
Jul 2017

is that if the 1000 radio stations that are now making excuses for him were screaming for his removal he's be gone in days. but it should be expected they would be making excuses for him since they got him there in the first place, with a little help from the russians.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
19. Treason requires making war on the United States
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 09:41 PM
Jul 2017

Or providing aid and comfort to an enemy in war. It's hard to call any of this treason in a legal sense, since we aren't at war with Russia. No Cold War spys that I'm aware of were ever convicted of treason.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
20. Painter is a law professor so I don't think he's just pulling that opinion
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 09:52 PM
Jul 2017

out of his butt. The Constitutional crime of treason, codified at 18 USC § 2381, is as follows:

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

This is usually interpreted as requiring a declared war but it doesn't say that specifically. You could also parse the statute as "levies war against them OR adheres to their enemies," and since this is an "or" statement, not an "and" statement, the existence of a war wouldn't be required, just adhering to enemies.

Espionage would probably be an easier bust, though.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On CNN, legal ethics guy ...