Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

malaise

(268,693 posts) Tue Jul 11, 2017, 08:05 PM Jul 2017

So what if Groper Don the Con was terrified in that meeting with Rasputin and has decided

to throw in the towel - that is the only thing that makes sense re the release of Con Jr's incriminaating emails.

LOCK THEM UP!

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So what if Groper Don the Con was terrified in that meeting with Rasputin and has decided (Original Post) malaise Jul 2017 OP

I wonder if they are hoping it all goes away if Jr. takes the hit. Solly Mack Jul 2017 #1

I commented earlier today that it's odd that Russia is demanding the return... displacedtexan Jul 2017 #2

Precisely malaise Jul 2017 #3

Solly Mack

(90,758 posts)

1. I wonder if they are hoping it all goes away if Jr. takes the hit.

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Tue Jul 11, 2017, 08:09 PM

Jul 2017

As well as Kushner and Manafort.

I wonder what they are up to is all.

I agree...lock them up. Lock them all up.

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)

2. I commented earlier today that it's odd that Russia is demanding the return...

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Tue Jul 11, 2017, 08:16 PM

Jul 2017

...of their spy palaces OR ELSE. Trump didn't expel those spies, nor did he seize those compounds. Obama did. Russia didn't threaten him, did they? Just Trump.

malaise

(268,693 posts)

3. Precisely

Reply to displacedtexan (Reply #2)

Tue Jul 11, 2017, 08:22 PM

Jul 2017

What we need to know is what did the Con promise Putin for their election 'work'?
Apparently the Con had no idea that the system was way more powerful than a rank amateur like him.

Reply to this discussion