Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 05:49 AM Jul 2017

Fox News: "DT Jr. could have met with Putin himself and it wouldn't be a crime."

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2017/07/14/foxs-gregg-jarrett-vladimir-putin-former-kgb-could-have-sat-trump-jr-meeting-and-it-wouldnt-be-crime/217272

GREGG JARRETT: The meeting with Donald Trump Jr., my goodness, you know, Vladimir Putin, former KGB, could have sat in on that meeting and it wouldn't be a crime. The -- the Constitution gives us the freedom to freely associate with anybody, including Russians, and the freedom to exchange ideas and information from any source, including Russians.

But there's this myth, somehow, that every Russian is the boogeyman, and if you dare talk with one of them, it's a heinous crime. The fact is there are no crimes here.




----------------

The talking-points mirror exactly the three stages of climate-change denial:
1. It didn't happen.
2. It happened, but it wasn't my fault.
3. It was my fault, but it's not a crime.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox News: "DT Jr. could have met with Putin himself and it wouldn't be a crime." (Original Post) DetlefK Jul 2017 OP
They keep missing the point. secondwind Jul 2017 #1
Also, not disclosing it onlyadream Jul 2017 #5
+1 dalton99a Jul 2017 #16
How quickly they went from clamoring for billions in MIC spending Ruby the Liberal Jul 2017 #2
Bernie Sanders Is A Socialist..... global1 Jul 2017 #3
AP reports the Russian ex-agent said the lawyer left a folder of DNC financials for Trump campaign Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #4
Stage 5: But her emails!! kairos12 Jul 2017 #12
Party to a criminal act. Hacking the DNC is just as much a crime as bugging it was. Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #6
There really is nothing they can do Cosmocat Jul 2017 #7
They are convincing the rubes that no crime was committed Docreed2003 Jul 2017 #8
Receiving stolen property is a crime. Botany Jul 2017 #9
You're right! That particular crime never occurred to me, but it fits. Vinca Jul 2017 #10
They are not loyal Americans mgardener Jul 2017 #11
Hillary jaxind Jul 2017 #13
True. But lying about it and failing to report it on the appropriate Federal forms is a crime. George II Jul 2017 #14
Jarret is a moron and a drunk* DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2017 #15
Okay, good. Now we know that DT met with Putin and Fox is preparing us pnwmom Jul 2017 #17
...says the gop ministry of propaganda spanone Jul 2017 #18
At the bottom of the page: Ilsa Jul 2017 #19
Soon it will be "Trump set up by Hillary." rgbecker Jul 2017 #20
Opps! We are already there! rgbecker Jul 2017 #21

secondwind

(16,903 posts)
1. They keep missing the point.
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 06:27 AM
Jul 2017

The crime is not the talking, so much as the INTENT behind the meeting, also known as COLLUSION. They are either ignorant or just selling their audience a bill of goods.

onlyadream

(2,164 posts)
5. Also, not disclosing it
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 07:09 AM
Jul 2017

If they didn't think it was wrong, then why didn't Sessions, Kushner, or Flynn cop to meetings on the forms?

Intent and omission.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
2. How quickly they went from clamoring for billions in MIC spending
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 06:56 AM
Jul 2017

because of the ultimate boogieman to "they're our best friend and a boon to the business world".

Oh, but we still need billions more in MIC 'defense' spending.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,930 posts)
4. AP reports the Russian ex-agent said the lawyer left a folder of DNC financials for Trump campaign
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 07:06 AM
Jul 2017

Stage 4:

4. It was a crime but I'm not a crook.


https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029328940

{excerpt}
Ranit Akhmetshin, a Russian American lobbyist and former Soviet counterintelligence officer, told The Associated Press on Friday he took part in the meeting on June 9, 2016, along with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya. Akhmetshin said Veselnitskaya brought a folder full of documents, which he said she left behind after the meeting.

The documents detailed the Democratic National Committee’s finances and funding sources, some of which Veselnitskaya described as unlawful, Akhmetshin told the AP.
{/excerpt}

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/trump-jr-russian-intelligence_us_5969356ee4b0d6341fe8f28f

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
6. Party to a criminal act. Hacking the DNC is just as much a crime as bugging it was.
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 07:11 AM
Jul 2017

Only difference is, here you have a hostile foreign power doing the break-in, instead of G. Gordon Liddy.

Docreed2003

(16,846 posts)
8. They are convincing the rubes that no crime was committed
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 07:17 AM
Jul 2017

This nonsense about "no crime was committed", is entirely for the rubes to convince them that no crime was committed. Never mind campaign finance laws, nevermind that this shows actual collusion, they are serving red meat to their base and keeping them brainwashed. I fear the result when their "hero" is finally brought down, if he ever is. As someone else said, if Fox had been around for Nixon, he would never have resigned!!

Botany

(70,425 posts)
9. Receiving stolen property is a crime.
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 07:21 AM
Jul 2017

Receiving stolen property is defined by statute in most states. Generally it consists of four elements: (1) the property must be received; (2) it must have been previously stolen; (3) the person receiving the property must know it was stolen; and (4) the receiver must intend to deprive the owner of his or her property.
A person receives stolen property by acquiring or taking manual possession of it. Physical possession, however, is not always required. Under some statutes, it is sufficient if the accused has exercised control over the property. For example, a statute may declare that paying for the property constitutes control, regardless of whether the accused has handled it.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Receiving+Stolen+Property

Vinca

(50,233 posts)
10. You're right! That particular crime never occurred to me, but it fits.
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 07:25 AM
Jul 2017

I wonder why none of the legal expert pundits haven't mentioned it.

mgardener

(1,810 posts)
11. They are not loyal Americans
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 07:44 AM
Jul 2017

They are not true, loyal Americans.
True Americans would have notified the FBI when contacted and offered information that indicates they had potentially damning information about wrongdoing by the former Secretary of State.

They did not do that. They lied about the meeting, who was there and what was discussed several times.
Mr. Kushner lied about this meeting on a form he filled out for security clearance. He still continues to receive highly sensitive classified information, despite lying about attending a meeting to potentially receive compromising information about the former SECRETARY OF STATE, because she was running for POTUS against his FIL.

The information offered was identified as coming from the Russia government and was offered to help Donald Trump win the election.
They attended this meeting, lied about it and think they did nothing wrong.
In my view, they are traitors to the American people and the United States.

jaxind

(1,074 posts)
13. Hillary
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 07:50 AM
Jul 2017

Who knew? Every time the Republicans were hell-bent on pinning Hillary down with something, all we needed to say was "hey, there was no crime committed" and they would have left her alone! Who knew that's all it would have taken to shut the republican witch hunts down against Hillary??! Oh, let me guess...for them, that wouldn't have been enough, yet they think that's enough for us to stop talking about Russia!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
15. Jarret is a moron and a drunk*
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 08:13 AM
Jul 2017

Ethel and Julius Rosenberg were freely associating with the Russians, exchanging ideas and information with them.

It's the nature of the information and not the meeting, stupid.



* https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/usanow/2014/05/22/fox-news-anchor-arrested/9427551/

pnwmom

(108,950 posts)
17. Okay, good. Now we know that DT met with Putin and Fox is preparing us
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 08:44 AM
Jul 2017

to learn about it eventually.

Ilsa

(61,688 posts)
19. At the bottom of the page:
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 08:51 AM
Jul 2017

Previously:

Fox's Gregg Jarrett: "Our Constitution" allows Americans to "place the interests of another nation ahead of those of the U.S."

Fox's Gregg Jarrett: "You can collude all you want with a foreign government in an election"

________

But somehow, Hillary's server was a problem, even though it was never hacked, that we are aware of.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fox News: "DT Jr. could h...