Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestion - can the administration be sued for trying to destroy an
established law - the ACA.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1392 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question - can the administration be sued for trying to destroy an (Original Post)
malaise
Jul 2017
OP
See what I don't understand is whether there is no redress if they sabotage an existing law
malaise
Jul 2017
#8
No - the function of the legislative branch is to make laws, change laws....
flor-de-jasmim
Jul 2017
#2
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)1. No.
malaise
(268,950 posts)4. So if they refuse to fund subsidies, etc to kill the bill
there is no legal remedy?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)7. If Congress passes a law that's unconstitutional,
the courts can be asked to strike it down, and a president can veto a law. But the legislative branch has the sole power to pass, amend and repeal laws, and can override a president's veto. That's the system of checks and balances, which does seem to be out of whack right now.
malaise
(268,950 posts)8. See what I don't understand is whether there is no redress if they sabotage an existing law
Thanks for your responses
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)9. Since Congress has control over appropriations nothing can be done
unless there is something wrong with the procedures by which that's done.
flor-de-jasmim
(2,125 posts)2. No - the function of the legislative branch is to make laws, change laws....
dalton99a
(81,455 posts)3. Courts have limited ability to check a president's failure to execute
and the asshole knows this
Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)5. No, but they could be impeached for it...
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)6. and then we would have President Pence. OH JOY!!1 nt
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)10. Possibly. If he exceeds his authority
and blocks provisions of the ACA, lawsuits could result in injunctions against those actions. I'm sure such suits are under consideration in case he does something that goes beyond what he can legally do.