Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,823 posts)
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 08:44 PM Jul 2017

Rand Paul: Dems running partisan witch hunt probes of Trump because they lost

he's a piece of work....sounds like it came right out of trump's mouth


Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Thursday the probes into the Trump administration’s possible ties to Russia are a “partisan witch hunt” pushed by Democrats because they lost the presidential election.

President Trump has repeatedly decried the investigation into him as a political "witch hunt." Paul agreed on "Fox & Friends," saying he believes that Republicans have attacked presidents of the opposite party in the same way in the past, insisting that the probe into Russian election meddling is partisan.

“Democrats lost the election, so they're going to investigate Trump for as long as he's in office,” Paul said.

Multiple congressional committees — all chaired by Republicans — are investigating Russia's efforts to influence last year's election and any possible ties to Trump's campaign, as is a special counsel appointed by the Justice Department.


http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/342896-paul-dems-running-partisan-witch-hunt-probes-of-trump-because-they-lost
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rand Paul: Dems running partisan witch hunt probes of Trump because they lost (Original Post) spanone Jul 2017 OP
But the GOP never did that to Bill Clinton RainCaster Jul 2017 #1
Putin said the same thing. Iliyah Jul 2017 #2
Think about what you said rufus dog Jul 2017 #16
Rand Paul pandering to Trump voters to try to make up mr_liberal Jul 2017 #3
Oh the irony...it burns. Thomas Hurt Jul 2017 #4
So... 8 months ago, Rand only voted for DJT because he'd promised not to 3rd party. politicat Jul 2017 #5
For heavens sake, we know we lost. Why can't they accept it. NT enough Jul 2017 #6
repubs control the whole government. dems can "run" anything w/out repub help nt msongs Jul 2017 #7
Sure is pure dissonance, isn't it? Blue_true Jul 2017 #22
Does Fox News Have Stock In Kleenex ? Grassy Knoll Jul 2017 #8
McCain said Rand Paul was serving the interests of Vladimir Putin and I agree. Tatiana Jul 2017 #9
Trump and Paul work for the same boss dalton99a Jul 2017 #10
Yup rufus dog Jul 2017 #18
+1000 n/t janx Jul 2017 #15
This jackass is worse than his dad onetexan Jul 2017 #11
Joy Reid's guest said that many more GOP reps are now denying Russian "meddling" BigmanPigman Jul 2017 #12
They're all in malaise Jul 2017 #13
I used to think Paul was just a navel gazing libertarian constitutional literalist. LSFL Jul 2017 #14
I don't know why a Democrat, Republican, Independent, or Libertarian janx Jul 2017 #19
Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller all have history of being Republicans wishstar Jul 2017 #17
Rand would better spend his time ... GeorgeGist Jul 2017 #20
Well, you use witch hunts for hunting witches. nikibatts Jul 2017 #21
Sounds like he took Russian money for his campaign. roamer65 Jul 2017 #23
I'm not going to read any of that s*** Dem2 Jul 2017 #24
 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
16. Think about what you said
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:30 PM
Jul 2017

Because it is highly likely that Putin told Rand to say this. We are into the smoke them out stage of this disaster. Rand has been smoked out.

 

mr_liberal

(1,017 posts)
3. Rand Paul pandering to Trump voters to try to make up
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 08:47 PM
Jul 2017

for opposing Trumpcare. Ive seen him this on other issues before.

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
4. Oh the irony...it burns.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 08:47 PM
Jul 2017

"Democrats lost the election, so they're going to investigate Trump for as long as he's in office,” Paul said."

politicat

(9,808 posts)
5. So... 8 months ago, Rand only voted for DJT because he'd promised not to 3rd party.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 08:49 PM
Jul 2017

He was unenthusiastic, at best.

So what changed? How much is now in a superPAC, or an offshore account under his daughter-in-law's maiden name?

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
22. Sure is pure dissonance, isn't it?
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:57 PM
Jul 2017

People like Rand Paul are crazy and not the lampshade on the head drunk crazy type either.

Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
9. McCain said Rand Paul was serving the interests of Vladimir Putin and I agree.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 08:58 PM
Jul 2017
Paul, an avowed libertarian, has often pushed for non-interventionist foreign policy goals and has voiced his opposition to the U.S.' leading position in NATO, of which Washington has been by far the biggest financial supporter. But McCain told lawmakers that acceding to Paul's objection to Balkan nation Montenegro joining the international military alliance would be to serve Moscow's interests. NATO has undergone a massive military escalation in the past year to counter what its members describe as Russian aggression after the 2014 annexation of Crimea from Ukraine.

"You are achieving the objectives of Vladimir Putin...trying to dismember this small country which has already been the subject of an attempted coup,” McCain said, without initially mentioning Paul by name, according to CBS News.

The charge apparently prompted Paul to leave the room, further provoking McCain, who went on to "note the senator from Kentucky leaving the floor without justification or any rationale." McCain blasted Paul for not getting on board with what he said were about 98 of his colleagues who reportedly supported Montenegro's NATO membership bid. He then accused Paul of directly working for Putin.

http://www.newsweek.com/cold-war-mccain-paul-russia-nato-568816


We should just assume Paul is a Russian asset. I think McCain had it right.

BigmanPigman

(51,584 posts)
12. Joy Reid's guest said that many more GOP reps are now denying Russian "meddling"
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:09 PM
Jul 2017

and the number is actually increasing with MORE evidence being gathered. WHAT?

Only Rod Serling could explain this current situation to me, and perhaps not even he could.

LSFL

(1,109 posts)
14. I used to think Paul was just a navel gazing libertarian constitutional literalist.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:14 PM
Jul 2017

But now I am starting to see him for the worthless Russophile dickskin that he is. I don't care how you identify politically, but once you start aiding and giving comfort to adversarial ass hats like Russia it is game over.

I know my rather bellicose attitude toward Russia causes concern among some here, but I am concerned about why any democrat would imagine that we could ever work with them in their current state.
I reserve the right to distrust and loathe any and all enemies of my country. All indications point toward them helping Trump win. That is an act of war my friends. Obama tried to get the ball rolling by expelling Russian diplomats. That is historically a step toward open hostility. They hope that trump will discredit us so much that our allies abandon us. And it is working.

But I digress. Rand Paul is a jackass but he has no clout or following. He really needs to use smaller words to catch the suckers he his fishing for.

janx

(24,128 posts)
19. I don't know why a Democrat, Republican, Independent, or Libertarian
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:36 PM
Jul 2017

could start doing so!

I have a Russian colleague in academe who is freaked out, as well as one from Ukraine. My God! And I agree about Rand Paul's audience.

Rand Paul is the consummate politician, holding his finger up to the wind--a bit like Adam Smith's "invisible hand" of economy.

wishstar

(5,268 posts)
17. Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller all have history of being Republicans
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:31 PM
Jul 2017

and now Grassley is approving subpoenas and even Richard Burr is not obstructing but seems to be facilitating Mark Warren's leadership role in their investigation, so it seems to have turned into a bipartisan "witch hunt"

GeorgeGist

(25,319 posts)
20. Rand would better spend his time ...
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:51 PM
Jul 2017

learning how to govern.

Most of the time he sounds like a chip off the old blockhead.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
24. I'm not going to read any of that s***
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 10:09 PM
Jul 2017

The Republicans have lost their minds and I don't even care what they have to say anymore they need to be removed from the government.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rand Paul: Dems running p...