Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NRaleighLiberal

(60,014 posts)
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 10:12 PM Jul 2017

Josh Marshall, TPM - "There It Is, Folks"

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/there-it-is-folks



By JOSH MARSHALL Published JULY 20, 2017 9:34 PM

A host of stories are out tonight on the Trump White House’s new war about Special Counsel and former FBI Director Robert Mueller. But I want to focus on one thing. The Post reports that the President has been canvassing his lawyers about the possibility of pardoning aides, family and even pardoning himself.

From the Post …

Some of President Trump’s lawyers are exploring ways to limit or undercut special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Russia investigation, building a case against what they allege are his conflicts of interest and discussing the president’s authority to grant pardons, according to people familiar with the effort.

Trump has asked his advisers about his power to pardon aides, family members and even himself in connection with the probe, according to one of those people. A second person said Trump’s lawyers have been discussing the president’s pardoning powers among themselves.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Josh Marshall, TPM - "There It Is, Folks" (Original Post) NRaleighLiberal Jul 2017 OP
Dump Knows His Fam & Friends Are Going Down Grassy Knoll Jul 2017 #1
Not the least bit surprising. I mean, that was an obvious one Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2017 #2
He should be talking to Mike Pence. yallerdawg Jul 2017 #3
Pence is going down, too. volstork Jul 2017 #8
This latest revelation is an admission of guilt if I've ever seen one. greatauntoftriplets Jul 2017 #4
It IS a legal admission of guilt, actually. dixiegrrrrl Jul 2017 #5
That's good to know. greatauntoftriplets Jul 2017 #6
I disagree on both counts. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #10
He doesn't KNOW if he can/can't pardon himself? leftstreet Jul 2017 #7
The Mad King is massively ignorant about anything to do with government, including The Law... Hekate Jul 2017 #9
Trump should never have happened in the first place. nt oasis Jul 2017 #11

volstork

(5,400 posts)
8. Pence is going down, too.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:39 PM
Jul 2017

Wouldn't surprise me if half of the GOP congress of both houses is implicated.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
5. It IS a legal admission of guilt, actually.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:25 PM
Jul 2017

And the second he tries to pardon anything, it will be in the courts, and appealed and dragged on up to SCOTUS
which takes time time time that he does not have, while the investigation continues.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
10. I disagree on both counts.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 03:23 AM
Jul 2017

First, for a new President, who obviously didn't prepare very well for the job, to ask experts about one aspect of the law concerning the powers of his office, is not an admission of guilt on his part, let alone an admission by anyone else. (My recollection is that legal experts are divided about whether accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt, but so far no one has accepted a pardon, so that's moot at this time.)

Second, the presidential pardoning power is absolute. There is no colorable legal case to be brought by anyone (even if you could find someone who had standing) that would justify a court in setting aside a pardon. If someone brought such a case, it would be dismissed very quickly, the dismissal would be affirmed, and the Supreme Court wouldn't even grant a petition to hear the case. Mueller knows all this and would not bring any criminal charges that were covered by such a pardon.

Mueller would, instead, act promptly to get sworn testimony from the pardoned person(s). The normal Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination doesn't apply to someone who's not at risk of a criminal prosecution. A pardon can't be prospective, so the pardonee would still be liable to prosecution for contempt (for defying a subpoena by not appearing or by not answering questions) or for perjury (for answering falsely). For that reason, Trump would be foolish to pardon some underling unless he's completely confident that the underling won't sing.

leftstreet

(36,106 posts)
7. He doesn't KNOW if he can/can't pardon himself?
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:29 PM
Jul 2017

He's having to ask?

What a fucking idiot

And what's the matter - doesn't he trust Pence to pardon him?

Hekate

(90,645 posts)
9. The Mad King is massively ignorant about anything to do with government, including The Law...
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:48 PM
Jul 2017

MAGA-ites wanted a businessman as president because idiots think running the government is/should be just like running a business, and that creating a federal budget is just like balancing a family budget at the kitchen table.

The blind leading the blind.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Josh Marshall, TPM - "The...