Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Madam45for2923

(7,178 posts)
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:03 PM Jul 2017

Is it right that whoever a President pardons cannot then plead the 5th b/c cannot incriminate self

Last edited Sat Jul 22, 2017, 07:03 AM - Edit history (2)

any longer? Is this like immunity?


Edit to add this article link provided by PoliticAverse:

How a Presidential Pardon Could Backfire

President Trump is considering pardoning family members and staffers caught up in the Russia investigation, but legal experts warn that it could backfire by making it harder for them to avoid testifying.

Under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, Americans are protected against self-incrimination, but people who have been pardoned are no longer under any legal jeopardy, Harvard Law School Professor Laurence Tribe told TIME.

"Anyone pardoned by Trump would lose most of the 5th Amendment’s protection against compelled testimony that might otherwise have incriminated the pardoned family member or associate, making it much easier for DOJ and Congress to require such individuals to give testimony that could prove highly incriminating to Trump himself," Tribe said in an email.

http://time.com/4868418/donald-trump-presidential-pardons-backfire/

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it right that whoever a President pardons cannot then plead the 5th b/c cannot incriminate self (Original Post) Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 OP
That's the legal theory. Foamfollower Jul 2017 #1
Interesting and interesting about Nizon not pardoning anyone because of that. Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #5
That's the way I understand it Kaleva Jul 2017 #2
And they cannot plead the 5th... forgotmylogin Jul 2017 #18
bingo GulfCoast66 Jul 2017 #3
2018 is around the corner though. Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #11
Yes. For a discussion see this Time Magazine article... PoliticAverse Jul 2017 #4
Thanks for the info/link!!! Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #6
A clear example of being careful what you wish for. Stinky The Clown Jul 2017 #7
Or people not pardoned might roll on Donald. Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #10
If a person is pardoned TomSlick Jul 2017 #8
Aha! So good to know. Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #9
Thanks for that, good to know. byronius Jul 2017 #12
But... wcmagumba Jul 2017 #13
One good thing is that Presidents cannot do pardons in the individual States courts like NY, NJ etc. Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #14
Correct TomSlick Jul 2017 #15
But he cannot pardon in States' courts! Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #16
Also correct. TomSlick Jul 2017 #17
For the most part I think that is correct but I can see scenarios where it might not be dsc Jul 2017 #19
But if not pardoned for something can get prosecuted for that exact something. Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #20
Kicking! Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #21
Kicking! Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #22
 

Foamfollower

(1,097 posts)
1. That's the legal theory.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:05 PM
Jul 2017

Not a lot of precedent to support it, though there is some and nothing in precedent counters it.

The key is, refusing to testify would be felony contempt and lying in testimony would still be perjury, which mens both would require an additional pardon.

It's also why Nixon didn't pardon anybody.

Kaleva

(36,235 posts)
2. That's the way I understand it
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:06 PM
Jul 2017

A person who accepts a pardon, and by doing so is admitting guilt, cannot plead the 5th and has to answer all questions or be held in contempt and if they lie, face perjury charges.

forgotmylogin

(7,518 posts)
18. And they cannot plead the 5th...
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 12:40 AM
Jul 2017

because that specific plea protects people from being coerced to incriminate themselves in a crime. Since they are pardoned for the crime, there is no danger of self-incrimination, so not answering truthfully is perjury or contempt.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
3. bingo
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:07 PM
Jul 2017

If they fail to testify they can be held in contempt.

If they lie, they can be charged with perjury.

Accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt. When the go to testify, they testify as an guilty person.

But do you see a republican congress holding any of Trumps toadies in contempt?

Stinky The Clown

(67,750 posts)
7. A clear example of being careful what you wish for.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:12 PM
Jul 2017

A pardoned Jarvanka will be compelled to roll over on Two Scoops

TomSlick

(11,082 posts)
8. If a person is pardoned
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:13 PM
Jul 2017

and if s/he accepts the pardon, then s/he cannot invoke the 5th Amendment because there is no risk of self-incrimination. However, a pardon is only effective if accepted by the person pardoned because the acceptance of a pardon is an admission of guilt. See, Burdick v. US, 236 U.S. 79 (1915).

wcmagumba

(2,878 posts)
13. But...
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:21 PM
Jul 2017

they could be pardoned for additional charges it seems....Kinda an infinity of pardons possible...crazy times.

 

Madam45for2923

(7,178 posts)
14. One good thing is that Presidents cannot do pardons in the individual States courts like NY, NJ etc.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:23 PM
Jul 2017

TomSlick

(11,082 posts)
15. Correct
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:25 PM
Jul 2017

The pardon power is extraordinarily broad. The drafters assumed a minimum level of decency on the part of public officials. But we know what comes of assuming.

dsc

(52,147 posts)
19. For the most part I think that is correct but I can see scenarios where it might not be
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 01:00 AM
Jul 2017

For example, lets say while Kushner was meeting with the Russians about stealing the election he also killed a hooker but Trump only pardoned him for the stealing of the election. He still could plead the fifth for questions that would lead to the discovery that he killed the hooker.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it right that whoever ...