Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI guess Don the con's taxes are now technically, under audit, ironic
It is suspected reported that Mueller is looking into all his finances and business financial dealings.
Now that's what I call a real audit, LMFAO couldn't happen to a nicer guy
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2168 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I guess Don the con's taxes are now technically, under audit, ironic (Original Post)
MiddleClass
Jul 2017
OP
magicarpet
(13,881 posts)1. Under audit you say ? Okay DefCon5 nobody can see nuttin.
If the tax returns are under IRS audit ~ nobody can see anything until the audit is absolutely complete ~ that includes Mueller.
So says DJT Sr.
My oh my ~ tr-dump's ass is about to burst into flames.
MiddleClass
(888 posts)2. Not a IRS or FBI, a Justice Department audit led by Mueller
That is way better, and from reports, criminal, not civil
magicarpet
(13,881 posts)3. Yes... Thank you... I realize that....
I was trying to mimic tr-dump's convoluted sort of backwards and up side down thinking.
I should have used one of these.
MiddleClass
(888 posts)4. I wasn't correcting, I was actually emphasizing sorry about that
If it sounded like that, it was my goal, but it was really emphasizing tongue-in-cheek sort of way
magicarpet
(13,881 posts)5. All is well...THX for the notation.