Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jimbo101

(776 posts)
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 10:33 PM Jul 2017

Seriously, they (Republicans who else !) are still fighting about light bulbs?

Daily Kos

Congressional Republicans renewed their effort to save the traditional light bulb, passing a measure to block federal energy standards that have come to symbolize government overreach for many consumers but are largely embraced by manufacturers as the cost of the newer bulbs has plummeted.

The House passed an amendment to a spending bill late Wednesday to block enforcement of Energy Department rules requiring manufacturers to phase out sales of incandescent light bulbs to cut power use. While the measure faces an uncertain future in the Senate, its sponsor called it an important victory for freedom.

"Congress should fight to preserve the free market," Representative Michael Burgess, a Texas Republican, said on the House floor before the vote. Burgess said he had heard from tens of thousands of people about how the regulations "will take away consumer choice when constituents are deciding which light bulbs they will use in their homes."

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Seriously, they (Republicans who else !) are still fighting about light bulbs? (Original Post) Jimbo101 Jul 2017 OP
Dim bulbs. Throck Jul 2017 #1
Don't they realize that LED bulbs last up to 9 years? meow2u3 Jul 2017 #2
Oh good lord. The stupid is so thick it weighs the whole country down. Stinky The Clown Jul 2017 #3
Let me get this straight Best_man23 Jul 2017 #4
The stupid runs deep in the party of Trump. GeorgeGist Jul 2017 #5
They need the incandescent ones... Archae Jul 2017 #6
OMG! DUzy! nt longship Jul 2017 #12
I know as soon as I post this every bulb in my house will burn out Silver Swan Jul 2017 #7
Omg, it's the free market that's causing the old incandescents to become obsolete. Canoe52 Jul 2017 #8
So...lets follow the Econ on this. Xolodno Jul 2017 #9
I've been switching over to LED as the old ones burn out Phoenix61 Jul 2017 #10
I try to stick to the wisdom in the old saying "pick your battles" The Genealogist Jul 2017 #11
well. we moved into a 1926 house. the front stoop bulb in the bronze/glass light pansypoo53219 Jul 2017 #13
We're going on three years on LEDs madokie Jul 2017 #14

meow2u3

(24,761 posts)
2. Don't they realize that LED bulbs last up to 9 years?
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 10:48 PM
Jul 2017

Traditional bulbs, from my experience, last about a year max. It makes no economic sense to try to save incandescent bulbs.

Best_man23

(4,897 posts)
4. Let me get this straight
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 10:53 PM
Jul 2017

They would rather stick with incandescent bulbs that burn out after a few hundred hours of use than use an LED bulb that lasts YEARS and requires a tenth of the power all in the name of "freedom"? The cost difference between LEDs and incandescents is close to negligible.

I switched the lights in my house over to LEDs last year, the house is noticeably cooler in the summer and my electric bill dropped by about 15%. You would think the potential for money savings alone would interest them.

Sheeple.

Silver Swan

(1,110 posts)
7. I know as soon as I post this every bulb in my house will burn out
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 11:20 PM
Jul 2017

But I have incandescent bulbs that are fifteen years old and still working. I hate to spend money on replacements that might only last 3 to 5 years.

Canoe52

(2,948 posts)
8. Omg, it's the free market that's causing the old incandescents to become obsolete.
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 11:34 PM
Jul 2017

These people are dumber than a box of rocks!

Xolodno

(6,384 posts)
9. So...lets follow the Econ on this.
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 11:45 PM
Jul 2017

Incandescent Bulbs burn out faster = mo money.

Incandescent Bulbs use more electricity = mo money.

Fluorescent, LED, etc. = burn out way later = less money.

Fluorescent, LED, etc. use less electricity = less money.

Note: mo money = mo money out of your pocket.

So, the obvious assumption is that these primitives = Beavis and Butthead => heh..heh..FIRE!...FIRE!

So, easy solution.

Allow property and casualty insurers to exclude fire caused by having indoor torches and those connected to a structure.

Then say, Democrats are against torches.

Phoenix61

(16,994 posts)
10. I've been switching over to LED as the old ones burn out
Sun Jul 30, 2017, 12:01 AM
Jul 2017

They have definitely come down in price over the last year or so.

The Genealogist

(4,723 posts)
11. I try to stick to the wisdom in the old saying "pick your battles"
Sun Jul 30, 2017, 12:10 AM
Jul 2017

There are so many issues facing America today. How bizarre that the battle some people choose is over keeping inefficient light bulbs that don't last as long.

pansypoo53219

(20,955 posts)
13. well. we moved into a 1926 house. the front stoop bulb in the bronze/glass light
Sun Jul 30, 2017, 05:26 AM
Jul 2017

never died. think it still worked AFTER being stolen by a drug/ebay rat. the back light lasted almost as long. the bulb in my shower is still the same bulb when we moved in 1989. got a daylight LED for the kitchen & it was AIRPORT! gotta get a softer 1.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
14. We're going on three years on LEDs
Sun Jul 30, 2017, 06:43 AM
Jul 2017

haven't replaced a single one yet. I dropped one while installing it in the bathroom and it broke the outer shell. I gave it to my brother and he uses it in his trouble light and have been close to three years now. They're not under a vacuum like an incandescent bulb is so they work as well undressed as they do with the cover on.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seriously, they (Republic...