Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 05:23 AM Jul 2017

Our state spends way too much time in the Supreme Court. The justices have taken notice.

Put an end to partisan gerrymandering in NC

BY PHYLLIS H. DEMKO AND LARRY KING

JULY 27, 2017 11:30 AM

Our state spends way too much time in the Supreme Court. The justices have taken notice.

In Justice Kagan’s recent opinion deciding Cooper v. Harris, she noted that N.C.’s 12th Congressional District was “making its fifth appearance before this Court.”

In addition to Cooper v. Harris, which held Congressional Districts 1 and 12 are illegal gerrymanders, a June 5 Supreme Court decision, North Carolina v. Covington, determined that 28 N.C. House and Senate districts are unlawful gerrymanders. The state remains mired in similar litigation. Since the current cycle of redistricting began in 2011, eight lawsuits were filed with claims of gerrymandering. Another – Dickson v. Rucho – has engaged the justices twice. As one justice observed, “We have almost reached a new redistricting cycle without any certainty as to the constitutionality of North Carolina’s current redistricting map.”

--

In North Carolina, we keep churning – partisan redistricting, then litigation, then court-ordered reforms and still more partisan redistricting. This takes a huge toll on the business of governing and produces enormous legal costs. One recent study for Common Cause North Caroline concludes that since 2011 the state has paid out $5 million for redistricting litigation. And this does not count in legal and other staff resources in the General Assembly and the Attorney General’s office. With other cases pending in the U.S. Supreme Court, and several awaiting trial, additional seven-figure costs are inevitable.

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/op-ed/article164127292.html#storylink=cpy

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Our state spends way too much time in the Supreme Court. The justices have taken notice. (Original Post) G_j Jul 2017 OP
I am not well versed in gerrymandering but is it possible BigmanPigman Jul 2017 #1
That would be wonderful. TNNurse Jul 2017 #2
Yes. obamanut2012 Jul 2017 #3
The Supreme Court will hear Gill v. Whitford in the fall. former9thward Jul 2017 #5
The advent of computers has accelerated the pace of gerrymandering... Wounded Bear Jul 2017 #7
that's the republican way barbtries Jul 2017 #4
We've been under siege G_j Jul 2017 #6
yep. it's been a nightmare. nt barbtries Jul 2017 #8
Do states budget for litigation? Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2017 #9

BigmanPigman

(51,584 posts)
1. I am not well versed in gerrymandering but is it possible
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:57 AM
Jul 2017

for the Supreme Court to make one decision that will effectively end gerrymandering in all states?

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
5. The Supreme Court will hear Gill v. Whitford in the fall.
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 08:21 AM
Jul 2017

It is a case from Wisconsin where the plaintiffs allege districts were drawn on a purely partisan basis. However the SC said that first it must determine whether it has jurisdiction in the case.

Gerrymandering has been around since 1812 and has and is used by both parties depending on the state. The SC has a history of avoiding political cases and defers to the legislative branch of government when it thinks that branch should settle the issue.

Wounded Bear

(58,647 posts)
7. The advent of computers has accelerated the pace of gerrymandering...
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 11:08 AM
Jul 2017

hell, they have programs that will do it for you. Mapping demographics is a prime tool of marketers, and the Repub party is all about marketing.

barbtries

(28,787 posts)
4. that's the republican way
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 07:51 AM
Jul 2017

slash and burn, scorched earth politics. they'll do whatever they think it takes to stay in power and abuse that power at every opportunity. I am in NC and they reallly suck a lot.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,406 posts)
9. Do states budget for litigation?
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 01:49 PM
Jul 2017

Seems like during the past 8 years, there has been an insane amount of litigation generated by right-wing legislatures passing radical laws, as well as state-level challenges to several Obama-era policies.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Our state spends way too ...