Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 12:22 PM Jul 2017

Dem campaign chief vows no "litmus test on abortion"

When did health care specific to women stop being a part of universal health care, not to mention part of our platform?

Democrats will not withhold financial support for candidates who oppose abortion rights, the chairman of the party’s campaign arm in the House said in an interview with The Hill.

Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) said there will be no litmus tests for candidates as Democrats seek to find a winning roster to regain the House majority in 2018.

“There is not a litmus test for Democratic candidates,” said Luján, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman. “As we look at candidates across the country, you need to make sure you have candidates that fit the district, that can win in these districts across America.”


In taking the position, Luján and Democrats risk alienating liberals, as well as groups dedicated to promoting access to abortion and reproductive health services that represent the core of the party’s base.

“Throwing weight behind anti-choice candidates is bad politics that will lead to worse policy,” said Mitchell Stille, who oversees campaigns for NARAL Pro-Choice America. “The idea that jettisoning this issue wins elections for Democrats is folly contradicted by all available data.”




http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/344196-dem-campaign-chief-vows-no-litmus-test-on-abortion
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dem campaign chief vows no "litmus test on abortion" (Original Post) ehrnst Jul 2017 OP
This is a non-issue J_William_Ryan Jul 2017 #1
Is that sarcasm? (nt) ehrnst Jul 2017 #2
It's more appropriate to not oppose a woman's right to choose n/t. cynatnite Jul 2017 #3
+ a million or so! eom BlueMTexpat Jul 2017 #4
+1000 (nt) ehrnst Jul 2017 #6
Unacceptable. MANative Jul 2017 #5
Exactly!!! nt Phoenix61 Jul 2017 #8
Seriously?!? Phoenix61 Jul 2017 #7
We had Democrats and others viciously maligning Hillary on her "abortion position(s)." yallerdawg Jul 2017 #9
Why stop there? Ban gay marriage! leftstreet Jul 2017 #10
The only "universal" issues seem to be those that directly affect straight white men. ehrnst Jul 2017 #11
That's an excellent point leftstreet Jul 2017 #12

J_William_Ryan

(1,749 posts)
1. This is a non-issue
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 12:29 PM
Jul 2017

Or it should be for Democrats.

It's perfectly appropriate and consistent to oppose abortion while defending a woman's right to privacy.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
5. Unacceptable.
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 12:44 PM
Jul 2017

No "pro-life" DINO will ever get a vote from me. Believe whatever the fuck you want in private, but legislate from a pro-choice position in every circumstance. Period. End of story.

Phoenix61

(16,999 posts)
7. Seriously?!?
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 12:50 PM
Jul 2017

This should be a non-issue because the Supreme Court ruled on this. Really don't appreciate him throwing women under the bus. Wonder what else won't be a litmus test and how crowded it's going to get under the bus?

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
9. We had Democrats and others viciously maligning Hillary on her "abortion position(s)."
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 01:03 PM
Jul 2017

Go ahead, make it a "litmus test" issue.

Our Tent is too damn Big, anyway.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
11. The only "universal" issues seem to be those that directly affect straight white men.
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 01:14 PM
Jul 2017

Other issues are "flexible."

If this is progress, then the GOP is WAY ahead of us.

Besides, more Americans doubt man-made climate change than oppose Roe v. Wade, so if we're going to sell out to get GOP votes, then we have a better option to throw under the bus.

http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/04/public-views-on-climate-change-and-climate-scientists/


http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/07/07/on-abortion-persistent-divides-between-and-within-the-two-parties-2/


</sarcasm>

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dem campaign chief vows n...