General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDem campaign chief vows no "litmus test on abortion"
When did health care specific to women stop being a part of universal health care, not to mention part of our platform?
Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) said there will be no litmus tests for candidates as Democrats seek to find a winning roster to regain the House majority in 2018.
There is not a litmus test for Democratic candidates, said Luján, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman. As we look at candidates across the country, you need to make sure you have candidates that fit the district, that can win in these districts across America.
In taking the position, Luján and Democrats risk alienating liberals, as well as groups dedicated to promoting access to abortion and reproductive health services that represent the core of the partys base.
Throwing weight behind anti-choice candidates is bad politics that will lead to worse policy, said Mitchell Stille, who oversees campaigns for NARAL Pro-Choice America. The idea that jettisoning this issue wins elections for Democrats is folly contradicted by all available data.
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/344196-dem-campaign-chief-vows-no-litmus-test-on-abortion
J_William_Ryan
(1,749 posts)Or it should be for Democrats.
It's perfectly appropriate and consistent to oppose abortion while defending a woman's right to privacy.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)cynatnite
(31,011 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,365 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)MANative
(4,112 posts)No "pro-life" DINO will ever get a vote from me. Believe whatever the fuck you want in private, but legislate from a pro-choice position in every circumstance. Period. End of story.
Phoenix61
(16,999 posts)Phoenix61
(16,999 posts)This should be a non-issue because the Supreme Court ruled on this. Really don't appreciate him throwing women under the bus. Wonder what else won't be a litmus test and how crowded it's going to get under the bus?
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Go ahead, make it a "litmus test" issue.
Our Tent is too damn Big, anyway.
leftstreet
(36,102 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Other issues are "flexible."
If this is progress, then the GOP is WAY ahead of us.
Besides, more Americans doubt man-made climate change than oppose Roe v. Wade, so if we're going to sell out to get GOP votes, then we have a better option to throw under the bus.
http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/04/public-views-on-climate-change-and-climate-scientists/
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/07/07/on-abortion-persistent-divides-between-and-within-the-two-parties-2/
</sarcasm>
leftstreet
(36,102 posts)!!
That would make a great OP