General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo what happens if Mueller indicts Trump and Trump responds by firing him and pardoning himself?
Ken Starr apparently said tonight that indicting and trying a sitting president is entirely appropriate. So that got me thinking: What would Congress do if Trump responded in the above fashion? Also, would the Supreme Court perhaps rule the pardon unconstitutional?
The_REAL_Ecumenist
(715 posts)FLAMING SH!T+ a BIGASS FAN x HOLY HELL!! period.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,839 posts)So that's a non starter. And I believe Trump's hands are tied in respect to firing Mueller.
So, guess what? Mueller could at least hypothetically indict Trump, and then we'll all start popping the popcorn.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 6, 2017, 04:25 AM - Edit history (1)
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)burnbaby
(685 posts)Isn't that what happened to Clinton? Congress voted to impeach but the senate voted it down. End of story
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Impeachment is analogous to indictment in regular court proceedings; trial by the other house is analogous to the trial before judge and jury in regular courts. Typically, the lower house of the legislature impeaches the official and the upper house conducts the trial.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States
Cosmocat
(14,561 posts)Anyone who could be a threat to implicate him, first off, particularly his family members.
Part of why people are completely dreaming if they think he's going to resign.
And, why would he not pardon himself. He has no shame, cant stoop any lower.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)How many think he's capable of THAT?
karynnj
(59,501 posts)might impeach and throw out respectively. Remember they get Pence - so it is not like losing the Presidency for them.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)(especially in the Gerald Ford version of "any crimes that might have been committed" vein), then what would stop future Presidents from blanket pardoning themselves immediately after inauguration?
Every day, it becomes more apparent that what we long accepted as laws are merely norms or traditions, but one can hope that this one is a bridge too far.
GreenEyedLefty
(2,073 posts)challenging the President's ability to self-pardon in the face of irrefutable evidence of wrongdoing.
Most likely it appears IMO the President has obstructed justice - so far he seems to be in the clear as far as direct collusion. (So far.)
tblue37
(65,273 posts)stand, but even if it did, he couln't pardon himserlf for state level crimes.