Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCall Bianca Moebius-Clune at @USDA and tell her how you feel about climate science censorship.
When the Administration Pruitt is not doing his duty of protecting the environment--isn't there someone, something that we can do about it? Seriously. I will put in a call.
Sesame Tweet? @SesameTweet3 2h2 hours ago
Replying to @kylegriffin1
Call Bianca Moebius-Clune at @USDA and tell her how you feel about climate science censorship.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
The Daily Edge? @TheDailyEdge 24m24 minutes ago
Poisoning our minds as well as our food supply: Trump Administration bars USDA from saying "climate change"
Link to tweet
Report: The USDA wont let its staff use the phrase climate change in any of its work
https://mic.com/articles/183424/report-the-usda-wont-let-its-staff-use-the-phrase-climate-change-in-any-of-its-work?tse_id=INF_43d08ad07b9a11e7b54e3f059c156cd3&utm_campaign=WHFacebook&utm_content=inf_686_285_2&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=policymicFB#.TuZG05LtS
Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt attends a meeting.
Source: Andrew Harnik/AP
Staff for the United States Department of Agriculture have been instructed by a senior staffer to avoid using the phrase climate change, according to a report in the Guardian.
According to a series of internal emails from the USDA obtained by the outlet, Bianca Moebius-Clune, director of soil health for the Natural Resources Conservation Society of the USDA, instructed her staff to swap out politically charged phrases like climate change for weather extremes and reduce greenhouse gasses for build soil organic matter, increase nutrient use efficiency.
The NRCS director reportedly encouraged her staff to pass along those departmental guidances on preferred language, maintaining that those instructions wont change the modeling, just how we talk about it.
Moebius-Clunes directive, which the Guardian characterized as censorial, appears to minimize human impact in the overheating of the planet.
Though it is unclear from the emails obtained by Guardian where the instructions in Moebius-Clunes staff note originated, her missive marks the latest mandate from the Trump administration that rejects the overwhelming surplus of scientific evidence supporting human-caused climate change.............................................
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 2230 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Call Bianca Moebius-Clune at @USDA and tell her how you feel about climate science censorship. (Original Post)
riversedge
Aug 2017
OP
riversedge
(70,077 posts)1. k for visibility
countryjake
(8,554 posts)2. Yes, another kick so we all respond to this outrage!
K&R!
Thanks for a good thread, riversedge!