Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ah well expect those short fingers to be tweeting in 3...2...1 (Original Post) malaise Aug 2017 OP
73% of Americans do not trust the WH malaise Aug 2017 #1
Which begs the question - who (or what) are the 27% who still trust King Don? Vinca Aug 2017 #2
Racists, xenophobes, misogynist and HopeAgain Aug 2017 #3
Assholes who worship the useless waste of oxygen dalton99a Aug 2017 #4
Welcome to the crazification factor muriel_volestrangler Aug 2017 #5
I did wonder about them malaise Aug 2017 #6

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
5. Welcome to the crazification factor
Tue Aug 8, 2017, 07:33 AM
Aug 2017
Crazification factor (alternatively known as the "Keyes constant&quot is a neologism coined by blogger John Rogers to refer to the portion of the electorate comprising the nuttiest of the wingnuts and the batshit crazy.

In popular usage, it is an application of the Texas sharpshooter fallacy, in which you only call attention to data supporting your proposition: you will find endless examples of people online crying "Crazification factor!" when 20-30% of people do something — anything — the speaker doesn't like, or are even polled as holding an opinion they don't like.

Rogers later stressed that the phrase was a joke, not some serious statistical proposition.

Origin of the term

Rogers was writing of the 2004 Senate election in Illinois:

“”Obama vs. Alan Keyes. Keyes was from out of state, so you can eliminate any established political base; both candidates were black, so you can factor out racism; and Keyes was plainly, obviously, completely crazy. Batshit crazy. Head-trauma crazy. But 27% of the population of Illinois voted for him. They put party identification, personal prejudice, whatever ahead of rational judgement. Hell, even like 5% of Democrats voted for him. That's crazy behaviour. I think you have to assume a 27% crazification factor in any population.

Another factor in Obama's favor at the time that Rogers didn't mention is that the original Republican candidate, Jack Ryan, had been forced to suspend his candidacy after his divorce and custody records were released to the press, revealing that he had taken his former wife, actress Jeri Ryan, to various sex clubs (including, in at least one case, a bondage club) and tried to have her perform sex acts on him out in the open. Keyes was the GOP's last-minute replacement on the ticket after the sordid details of Ryan's divorce came out. So not only was it a normal candidate running against a clearly crazy opponent, but the crazy guy also had the baggage of the last guy's sex scandal following him, and had been drafted into the campaign with little time to prepare.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crazification_factor
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ah well expect those shor...