There are two fuckers on the planet who don't understand the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction

[NightWatcher]

Or they don't care

[Historic NY]

1. Blow the fuckers up......

one guy uses artillery to kill his opponents, a rifle has such a little effect.

[BigmanPigman]

2. There is a difference between these two fuckers.

The one on the left is pissed off because the guy on the right is screwing with his "working vacation".

[Freethinker65]

3. Why not just play a long game of Risk and leave the rest of the world alone?

[NightWatcher]

4. Why not just give the two of them a ruler and let them measure their schlongs and settle it that way

[Freethinker65]

5. The game of Risk is longer. Hahaha

[panader0]

6. Both are nuts for sure,

but I don't think it's Mutually Assured Destruction for the US.
KJU has maybe a couple of bombs that could reach the US. We have
hundreds that are near N Korea. NK would be destroyed, the US could be wounded.
The damage in S Korea would be horrible.

[NightWatcher]

7. You know what I mean

No one wanted to launch them after WWII because of the severe amount of damage that both sides would incur. Sure, if NK hit San Fransisco, people in Miami would be ok (physically), but what would happen to the world markets and general welfare of the country...

[AngryAmish]

8. Only one side is assured of destruction

The losers will be South Korea.

It has been good to know them.