Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
Tue Aug 8, 2017, 11:36 PM Aug 2017

I'm reading a lot of first strike nonsense on the internet

Not just a first strike but an Operation Barbarossa or Pearl Harbor like first strike. First of all Americans don't do that and second of all every military experts say the monetary and humanitarian costs are staggering.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm reading a lot of first strike nonsense on the internet (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2017 OP
So who would stop Trump from giving the order? RandySF Aug 2017 #1
Since it would require deliberation and planning I suspect his generals would... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2017 #4
He already said he was going to do it if NK threatened. Alice11111 Aug 2017 #11
Too many people don't learn from experience and always have great big opinions. rusty quoin Aug 2017 #2
War crime C_U_L8R Aug 2017 #3
The Atlantic has an article which spells out all the options. ginnyinWI Aug 2017 #5
Good article. Basically, all end in either option 1 or 4, with 4 being wait them out, and 1 Strelnikov_ Aug 2017 #7
A few nukes are cheap, Trump has no human decency Cicada Aug 2017 #6
What would the world reaction be if we incinerated twenty million Koreans ? DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2017 #8
If he tries to nuke I think 25th amendment will stop him Cicada Aug 2017 #17
Keep you eye on Pence... Zoonart Aug 2017 #28
Problem is, SK will be destroyed, and the systemic catabolic collapse of the world economy Strelnikov_ Aug 2017 #9
Yes. For sure. Alice11111 Aug 2017 #13
We did "preemptive" war in Iraq XRubicon Aug 2017 #10
Sadly for many the Iraq War has gone down the memory hole. Willie Pep Aug 2017 #16
Now, our Pres is truly mentally ill though. Plus, he Alice11111 Aug 2017 #12
True. Caliman73 Aug 2017 #14
Probably right about his base, unless someone has a son Alice11111 Aug 2017 #24
He'll just 'forget' Guam is a U S territory and ignore the threat. Shrike47 Aug 2017 #15
Americans don't do that ? Voltaire2 Aug 2017 #18
We attacked a nation out of the blue like in Pearl Harbor or Operation Barbarossa. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2017 #19
"First strike". Voltaire2 Aug 2017 #21
i was pretty clear DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2017 #22
Keep in mind what a liar he is. ginnyinWI Aug 2017 #20
Nothing will happen. Pretty soon he'll be bragging about how his "doctrine of unpredictability" dalton99a Aug 2017 #23
Donald Trump leading a war is absured Bradical79 Aug 2017 #25
Seems trumps cult jambo101 Aug 2017 #26
Yes, an American nuclear first strike could only happen if we lived in Bizarro World. Girard442 Aug 2017 #27
YEP! Zoonart Aug 2017 #29

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
4. Since it would require deliberation and planning I suspect his generals would...
Tue Aug 8, 2017, 11:43 PM
Aug 2017

Since it would require deliberation and planning thus giving them to think about it I suspect his generals would if they determined the risks outweighed the benefits.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
11. He already said he was going to do it if NK threatened.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 12:29 AM
Aug 2017

So, of course, NK threatened, within hours of DT's pronouncement, to take out Guam..

Unless someone, probably China, deescalates this, which
may also mean silencing DT, it's here.

ginnyinWI

(17,276 posts)
5. The Atlantic has an article which spells out all the options.
Tue Aug 8, 2017, 11:45 PM
Aug 2017

None of them are good. But keeping it going as it has been going is probably the best option.

If the U.S. strikes North Korea, South Korea and Japan get attacked at minimum. We'd be wiping out major cities in those countries.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/07/the-worst-problem-on-earth/528717/

Strelnikov_

(7,772 posts)
7. Good article. Basically, all end in either option 1 or 4, with 4 being wait them out, and 1
Tue Aug 8, 2017, 11:52 PM
Aug 2017

being a massive surprise attack.

Guess the 'surprise' part of 1 is, well, moot.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
6. A few nukes are cheap, Trump has no human decency
Tue Aug 8, 2017, 11:46 PM
Aug 2017

Trump will probably rise in polls if he murders a few hundred thousand foreigners.

And a few hundred thousand dead asians mean nothing to him.


Americans will mostly think: whew, no more risk we will get nuked by NK. God I love Trump.

Admittedly the world may go into recession but higher polls are worth it.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
8. What would the world reaction be if we incinerated twenty million Koreans ?
Tue Aug 8, 2017, 11:57 PM
Aug 2017

And those that survived pouring over the Chinese border?

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
17. If he tries to nuke I think 25th amendment will stop him
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 03:41 AM
Aug 2017

If Pence and a majority of the cabinet agree then Trump is replaced by Pence.

If foreign govts think he might nuke NK then they might plant someone to get near him at a golf course, or other location, to spray an invible sleeping gas toward his mouth and nose. If you could stop Trump wouldn't you have to do it?

Strelnikov_

(7,772 posts)
9. Problem is, SK will be destroyed, and the systemic catabolic collapse of the world economy
Tue Aug 8, 2017, 11:57 PM
Aug 2017

will probably result in a billion or more deaths.

People just do not understand how close to the edge a large part of the world's population lives.

A small number of crooks gaming the system about crashed it in '08 . . . imagine what a few nukes will do to 'consumer confidence' and the banking system.

We are in uncharted territory.

Willie Pep

(841 posts)
16. Sadly for many the Iraq War has gone down the memory hole.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 02:23 AM
Aug 2017

It is a shame that so many people don't talk about it anymore. It was likely the biggest foreign policy blunder in American history but now people barely seem to remember it and talk about how fun the Bush years were. Uh!

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
12. Now, our Pres is truly mentally ill though. Plus, he
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 12:34 AM
Aug 2017

doesn't care if we lose S Koreans. There are about 100,000 Americans living there.

Caliman73

(11,735 posts)
14. True.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 12:41 AM
Aug 2017

I think the biggest thing for him is saving face and showing that he is tough.

I was reading that in Seoul there are about 630 thousand foreign nationals living and working. I think that the world will condemn any preemptive action taken by the US and the world economy would be thrown into chaos.

His base will not care, but everyone else with half a brain and a smidgen of conscience would certainly care.

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
15. He'll just 'forget' Guam is a U S territory and ignore the threat.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 01:18 AM
Aug 2017

In fact, he probably really doesn't know Guam is part of the U S and doesn't give a damn anyway.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
19. We attacked a nation out of the blue like in Pearl Harbor or Operation Barbarossa.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 08:17 AM
Aug 2017

The invasion of Iraq was the biggest strategic blunder in the history of the republic but we couldn't have been more transparent in announcing we were going to invade them.

ginnyinWI

(17,276 posts)
20. Keep in mind what a liar he is.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 09:54 AM
Aug 2017

That is the most consistent trait he has--he lies all the time. So the first thing to think whenever he makes a statement like this is that it is a lie or a bluff. I think he figures if he makes a great big threat, he will stop is opponent and not have to do anything more.

He won't mind if he doesn't follow through on some statement he makes. He's well practiced at weaseling out of things he's said he will or will not do. Just forgets it and moves 180 on the issue and completely contradicts himself. I'd expect after this threat he could easily make a complete shift.

One of his ploys is to keep the opponent off balance with stuff like this. He doesn't mind not keeping his word or sticking to a script!

dalton99a

(81,455 posts)
23. Nothing will happen. Pretty soon he'll be bragging about how his "doctrine of unpredictability"
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 05:10 PM
Aug 2017

has saved the world

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
25. Donald Trump leading a war is absured
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 06:01 PM
Aug 2017

We did the preemptive strike thing in Iraq, but at least there was a plan. Not a well thought out long term plan, but still a plan.

Trump just wings it. He doesn't even know where to begin on something of this scale. The lost carrier group and ineffective missle strike on that Syrian base probably give a good idea of what a shit show any full scale war will be under Trump. He'll give some vague directive then go play golf, take a nap, or watch tv.

jambo101

(797 posts)
26. Seems trumps cult
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 06:07 PM
Aug 2017

Is all for going in with a first strike. astounding ignorance that could get us into WW3 with Russia and or China in a real hurry.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm reading a lot of fir...