Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
Sun Aug 13, 2017, 09:52 PM Aug 2017

What evidence was actually shown that NK had miniaturised nukes?

I know this is not the current topic but I was wondering what evidence was shown that NK had successfully miniaturised nuclear ICBM nukes? I know it was reported that this was a fact but what evidence has been shown?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What evidence was actually shown that NK had miniaturised nukes? (Original Post) Locut0s Aug 2017 OP
Only the DIS, the department that incorrectly defacto7 Aug 2017 #1
What department is the DIS?... Locut0s Aug 2017 #2
There seems to be much more international consensus, without the arm twisting that accompanied Ms. Toad Aug 2017 #4
I think it was a educated guess.. EX500rider Aug 2017 #3

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
1. Only the DIS, the department that incorrectly
Sun Aug 13, 2017, 09:58 PM
Aug 2017

reported the same thing a few years ago that got Flynn fired by Obama for false info.

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
2. What department is the DIS?...
Sun Aug 13, 2017, 10:05 PM
Aug 2017

Sorry I'm not very familiar with all the departments of the US government, I'm Canadian. What you said though is what I thought, that we and the media have been taking a government report on their word alone. Obviously they are not going to release classified information that could compromise information about the US nuclear arsenal. But that doesn't mean they couldn't release ANY information. Even a redacted report would be better than nothing. I'm not saying that NK has NOT miniaturised nukes. I'm sure they want to and have been exploring how to. But doing so is not a simple task and they had trouble getting any nuclear program up and running. It seems like quite a convenient occurance that Trump is in dire straits and suddenly a distraction like this arrises.

Ms. Toad

(33,975 posts)
4. There seems to be much more international consensus, without the arm twisting that accompanied
Sun Aug 13, 2017, 10:08 PM
Aug 2017

the lead-up to the Iraq war, for example.

In addition, the conclusion is based on the normal number of nuclear tests it takes to miniaturize (N. Korea is past that in tests confirmed by more than one country.)

Is it dead solid - no. But much more so than quesionable, single-source- information we've had in the past.

EX500rider

(10,782 posts)
3. I think it was a educated guess..
Sun Aug 13, 2017, 10:06 PM
Aug 2017

...they detonated their 1st nuke 11 years ago, they should be close by now. The Pakistani's managed it and the N Korean's will too. Hard to say if it will survive a lift off and re-entry with out testing but the design can be worked out.
The US did it 60 years ago with much more primitive technology with the Atlas ICBM warhead.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What evidence was actuall...