Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

superpatriotman

(6,232 posts)
Mon Aug 28, 2017, 10:04 AM Aug 2017

Development versus Re Development

Clearly many of the residential structures of the country are aged, unsafe and insufficient for current and future climate disasters.

Millions of jobs could be created for decades to tear down and rebuild our old infrastructure.

Private/public partnerships would keep the regressives happy. Jobs and economic security would keep the other 99% happy. Having a safe place to live should make everyone happy. And ultimately the country could be made stronger and more self sufficient.

Now all we need is true, forward-thinking leadership and ingenuity to birth this vision and sell it to the banks and developers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Development versus Re Dev...