Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:01 PM Jul 2012

My Prediction: He admits staying at Bain

He gives a speech modeled after Reagan's "I sold weapons to the Iranians" speech and peppers it with phrases like:

Compared to my usual workload, this was nonexistent

I attended a couple meetings and signed a few documents a year

The salary was less than 1% of my usual earnings at Bain and my workload was reduced by the same amount

I can see now that even this slight involvement, in a purely oversight capacity, should have been disclosed and I regret not being more precise in my statements



The underlying tone is "I am so freaking important that this trivial few hundred millions in deals isn't even worth remembering".





This gets him out of all the false SEC filings and the perjury issue. He then needs to own the fact that his company outsourced while he was still there. It can be spun as "I understand the global economy and anyone who doesn't isn't qualified to be President in this day and age". It won't be easy to stand up to the attacks for having cost Americans their jobs but he is going to be attacked for that even if he never moves past the denial phase.


I don't see any other path. He won't drop out and Ron Paul isn't going to beat him out of the nomination. Even a floor battle seems unlikely, although that is still possible. He can't stay in denial forever because the evidence is overwhelming. He has to do it. The only question is when. Maybe right before the Olympics, or just a few days before. This limits the news cycles that the story can dominate and by the time the Olympics end it will be old news.


At least, if I were in his position this is what I would do. Then again, I am not a lying sack of shit so expecting him to do what I would do might be the wrong approach.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
2. My guess is he'll say something like "I don't care what you think or how you vote....
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:08 PM
Jul 2012

... the guys at Diebold/ESS/Sequoia say I'm gonna win!"

turtlerescue1

(1,013 posts)
3. Yep, agree with you.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:14 PM
Jul 2012

It will be worded and find an excuse to those "misunderstandings". Something that is just "plausible" enough to keep his friends contented.

Time will sure tell eh?

Submariner

(12,499 posts)
4. But, he already admitted staying at Bain into 2002
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:28 PM
Jul 2012

to the State of Mass. to show he qualified as a resident to run for governor. Otherwise, he would be guilty of a felony for lying to the State.

He can't have it both ways.

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
6. I think you're right....he'll admit to the lesser crime so he won't have to release his tax returns.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:37 PM
Jul 2012

which is where the really bad stuff is. He'll say this answers all the questions and will want to move on.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
7. His problem is that people don't want to know how the sausage is made.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:47 PM
Jul 2012

Not-Joe the Non-Plumber types lurves them some rich folk. They just don't want to know how the rich folk got to be rich - like by firing half of their community and shipping the jobs off to Mexico...

Willard knows that is the death knell. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain and all that.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
15. Don't the FEC documents say that he was still at Bain?
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:19 PM
Jul 2012

If so then admitting that he was still at Bain confirms the documents.


No, I don't see that conundrum.


 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
9. Oh, for the days of Watergate:
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:54 PM
Jul 2012

PRESIDENT: You think, you think we want to, want to go this route now? And the--let it hang out, so to speak?

DEAN: Well, it's, it isn't really that--

HALDEMAN: It's a limited hang out.

DEAN: It's a limited hang out.

EHRLICHMAN: It's a modified limited hang out.

PRESIDENT: Well, it's only the questions of the thing hanging out publicly or privately.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout




Spazito

(50,182 posts)
10. It's too late in the 'game' for him to do that, imo...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:03 PM
Jul 2012

and gain from it. Admitting he remained at Bain brings into question breach of contract with the Olympics, how did he profit through Bain and it's companies that provided services to the Olympics, etc. It also brings into question other disclosure documents he signed stating he left in 1999.

The demand for his tax returns would not be addressed were he to admit he remained at Bain. If anything, it would get louder, imo.

Romney is between a rock and a hard place due to his own actions, his own words, his own signature.

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
11. It don't believe it would absolve him from " false SEC filings and the perjury issue."
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:03 PM
Jul 2012

If anything, he would be admitting to some level of guilt and leaving himself exposed (without some kind of immunity deal from prosecution ) which would need to be addressed.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
13. I believe you are wrong. He swore that he was still attending meetings
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:14 PM
Jul 2012

in MA while living in Utah.

By admitting that he was still with Bain it confirms this testimony.

skip fox

(19,356 posts)
14. You've got it right! But because of his mentality, his arrogance, and his meanness
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:18 PM
Jul 2012

he'll never to it.

At least I hope he won't.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My Prediction: He admits ...