General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS Says No Money for Social Programs, But '$700 Billion to Kill People? Yup!
I'm sorry but this enrages me. Absolutely infuriates me. Makes my head spin and say "what the hell is going on with our reps?!"
I am sick and tired of hearing the argument of "that costs too much!" or "no we can't have this because it will raise taxes!" as excuses for NOT having social programs like the rest of the damn world has. When are we going say enough is enough while we seemingly have all this money for military bullshit? Seriously!
Only 8 senators voted against this bill, 3 didn't vote. 8. EIGHT.
This isn't right folks. Here is a list of the 8 who said no: Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Pat Leahy (D-Vt.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ron Paul (R-Ky.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), and Bob Corker (R-Tenn.).
Here is a list of those who all said yes.
Where were the pundits and elected lawmakers who complain about the cost of providing healthcare to all Americans when the Senate voted to spend $700 billion on the military?
Many critics were raising this question Monday after the Senatein what was portrayed as yet another indication of bipartisan support for endless waroverwhelmingly approved the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which will dump a larger sum of money into the military budget than even President Donald Trump asked for while also authorizing the production of 94 F-35 jets, two dozen more than the Pentagon requested.
Passage of the NDAAwhich this year approves a $700 billion defense budget, an annual increase of $80 billionis something of an automated process in Washington, one that often flies under the radar and garners little opposition.
However, with support for Medicare for All and free public college tuition soaring, many are calling attention to the hypocrisy of pundits who yell about the costs of single-payer healthcare providing debt-free higher education while remaining entirely silent about the war budget.
MORE https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/09/19/us-says-no-money-social-programs-700-billion-kill-people-yeah-we-have
Bettie
(16,069 posts)well, it was politically expedient...pragmatic, etc.
CherokeeFiddle
(297 posts)WinstonSmith00
(228 posts)Its truly disgusting that the people that voted yes on that list would rather see a baby die from US bomb than give children in our own country guaranteed universal health care.
Death and destruction is more important than life to anyone who supported this fraud against US tax payers.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)At least Sanders is consistent. But Warren? Voting for what is essentially a corporate giveaway? Because for sure that money is not gong to the troops in the form of higher pay or benefits. It is a slush fund for corporations to create more weapons systems that don't actually work.
It seems Democrats are still trying to overcome their wimp image. Though that is unwarranted, given how war-mongery they are when they are elected President.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts). . . . normally one of the best progressives we have in the Senate, he's between a rock and a hard-on.
Koch-funded Josh Mandel is running against him . . . again . . . and having Koch money is the only thing propping up Josh Mandel, as bigwigs in his own party don't even like him. They think he's a sleazy, smarmy Rovian shit with zero scruples and they're right. Unfortunately, Ohio just committed the mother of all fuck-ups and turned the state as deep red as Texas.
Despite Brown being pro-worker and anti-offshore outsourcing, any one less thing Mandel can hang on Brown ("WEAK ON THE TROOPS!!" retains his seat. That's all Ohio doesn't need is two teabagger Senaturds.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)(Leaving aside that this bill is not at all about the people in the military), but for the rest it just seems cowardly.
But of course the MIC has everyone over a barrel. Some of the few manufacturing jobs still left in this country are all in war-based corporations. So more weapons = more jobs. Never mind the actual need or the fact that our military is hundreds of time bigger than anyone else's.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts). . . . anyone who wants to start 200 response threads about how a single-payer system will never work in this country because "IT JUST CAWSTS TOO MUUUUUUUUUUUCCH" can, you know, just shut the rip-roaring fuck up forever.
Oh, did I also mention that the US spends almost twice as much on Corporate Welfare as it does on social welfare?
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)of unsustainability. Sorry kids.