Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The FBI says as many as 39 states had their voting systems scanned or targeted by Russia. (Original Post) kpete Sep 2017 OP
Nyet....just a little Russian tourists exploring the USA Pachamama Sep 2017 #1
An attack this administration denies happened. Dereliction of duty. nt wiggs Sep 2017 #2
How Many Of These States Are/Were Under Repug Control global1 Sep 2017 #3
I'd like to see the correlation myself. Pacifist Patriot Sep 2017 #9
It's not just the states. It's the machines. raven mad Sep 2017 #13
I was reading a lot of things like that before the 2004 election which is why i was not surprised Amaryllis Sep 2017 #38
6/13/17 Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known Botany Sep 2017 #4
Some people are about 16 years late to this party. L. Coyote Sep 2017 #5
I was thinking the same thing, Problem was 45 didnt even try to hide alot of it........ Old Vet Sep 2017 #7
No kidding, Coyote Hekate Sep 2017 #10
Me too. That was what got me involved in DU. Amaryllis Sep 2017 #24
Cleland 2002. bullimiami Sep 2017 #29
Yes. Amaryllis Sep 2017 #34
After the Comey statement WhiteTara Sep 2017 #30
Amen to this! hamsterjill Sep 2017 #11
K&R MrsCoffee Sep 2017 #6
And I'll bet 2018 and 2020 Golden Raisin Sep 2017 #8
We need lawyers to present this evidence to their respective courts and demand paper ballots Maraya1969 Sep 2017 #43
So I'm supposed to believe hamsterjill Sep 2017 #12
This BadgerMom Sep 2017 #15
I certainly don't, not after reading the following article RandomAccess Sep 2017 #17
Yep, we are all supposed to believe that becasue the party line is no vote totals were changed. Amaryllis Sep 2017 #25
From what I understand Eko Sep 2017 #27
This Is 100% Wrong! SoCalMusicLover Sep 2017 #31
Also they can have malware installed prior to the election that can alter the votes. Amaryllis Sep 2017 #36
This is where my concern lies. hamsterjill Sep 2017 #40
From your link. Eko Sep 2017 #37
Your link also said nothing about Eko Sep 2017 #39
45 puts all of his efforts and $ to prevent fair voting (ACA Koboch) BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #14
I think voter selection/electoral fraud should be punishable by death 47of74 Sep 2017 #16
Considering that it means 32 million without healthcare ProudLib72 Sep 2017 #21
Plus the wrong person, put in through cheating, could lead to worldwide nuclear war. 47of74 Sep 2017 #22
GA SoS, Brian Kemp (R), dismissed previous reports as "fake news." CottonBear Sep 2017 #18
Investigate, prosecute, incarcerate russian-republican TreasonWeasels Achilleaze Sep 2017 #19
Kick. dalton99a Sep 2017 #20
Is there a list of the 39 states? Delmette2.0 Sep 2017 #23
Our government is illigitmate across the board broadcaster90210 Sep 2017 #26
Explain Why Voting Matters SoCalMusicLover Sep 2017 #28
Trump was installed as President by the Russians Thrill Sep 2017 #32
I have zero doubt all 50 states were compromised and the voting was tampered with riderinthestorm Sep 2017 #33
I feel the same way. hamsterjill Sep 2017 #41
The FBI says as many as 39 states had their voting systems scanned or targeted by Russia. LenaBaby61 Sep 2017 #35
Problem with the headline of the article garybeck Sep 2017 #42
So we are talking about 39 States, not 21. Hmmm numbers increasing... Madam45for2923 Sep 2017 #44

global1

(25,237 posts)
3. How Many Of These States Are/Were Under Repug Control
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 11:32 AM
Sep 2017

Does this targeting only involve states under Repug control.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
13. It's not just the states. It's the machines.
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 12:49 PM
Sep 2017
While Diebold has received the most attention, it actually isn’t the biggest maker of computerized election machines. That honor goes to Omaha-based ES&S, and its Republican roots may be even stronger than Diebold’s.

The firm, which is privately held, began as a company called Data Mark, which was founded in the early 1980s by Bob and Todd Urosevich. In 1984, brothers William and Robert Ahmanson bought a 68 percent stake in Data Mark, and changed the company’s name to American Information Services (AIS). Then, in 1987, McCarthy & Co, an Omaha investment group, acquired a minority share in AIS.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2004/03/diebolds-political-machine/

Amaryllis

(9,524 posts)
38. I was reading a lot of things like that before the 2004 election which is why i was not surprised
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:33 PM
Sep 2017

when they stole it.

Botany

(70,479 posts)
4. 6/13/17 Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 11:34 AM
Sep 2017
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections

Russia’s cyberattack on the U.S. electoral system before Donald Trump’s election was far more widespread than has been publicly revealed, including incursions into voter databases and software systems in almost twice as many states as previously reported.

In Illinois, investigators found evidence that cyber intruders tried to delete or alter voter data. The hackers accessed software designed to be used by poll workers on Election Day, and in at least one state accessed a campaign finance database. Details of the wave of attacks, in the summer and fall of 2016, were provided by three people with direct knowledge of the U.S. investigation into the matter. In all, the Russian hackers hit systems in a total of 39 states, one of them said.

Old Vet

(2,001 posts)
7. I was thinking the same thing, Problem was 45 didnt even try to hide alot of it........
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 11:51 AM
Sep 2017

Man I sure hope 45 gets what is coming to him so fucking bad......

Hekate

(90,616 posts)
10. No kidding, Coyote
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 12:45 PM
Sep 2017

We had a front-row seat here at DU. It was a big part of my education.

(GNU Andy Stephenson, and RIP)

Amaryllis

(9,524 posts)
24. Me too. That was what got me involved in DU.
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 08:51 PM
Sep 2017

Never forget watching the red shift on election night. Saw the same thing in 2016, and said to my friends, "I've seen this before. THey stole it again." I was not one of those people who was sure Hillary would win. Too much hacking and Russia stuff ahead of the election. So it was of course a big disappointment but not a surprise. Just like in 2004.

Golden Raisin

(4,607 posts)
8. And I'll bet 2018 and 2020
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 12:29 PM
Sep 2017

are already targeted and vulnerable to repeat performances. Between gerrymandering, homegrown election rigging/manipulation and "Russification" I am very doubtful about "throwing the bums out" in the upcoming elections. Election integrity is crucial. The Russians know it. The drastic dimensions of what happened in 2016 are still not fully appreciated or understood by many in the USA.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
12. So I'm supposed to believe
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 12:49 PM
Sep 2017

That Russia "scanned or targeted" voting systems in 39 states, but not one vote was manipulated by Russia in the General Election, and that Trump actually won?

Come on!!! I've got some ocean front property in Arizona that I'd love to sell.

The election was hacked and Heir Trumpenmeister is an illegitimate president.

 

RandomAccess

(5,210 posts)
17. I certainly don't, not after reading the following article
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 01:59 PM
Sep 2017

Altho I will say that it's not like we've not had stolen elections thanks to those damn machines prior to this, so I don't know if it was the Russians or the Republicans, but SOMEBODY did this:


PALMER: Rigged election: Donald Trump won every surprise swing state by the same 1% margin
http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/rigged-election-donald-trump-won-every-surprise-swing-state-by-the-same-1-margin/118/

The most commonly posited explanation of Donald Trump’s shocking election victory was that every professional pollster in the nation – despite each working independently and using differing methodologies – somehow managed to overlook the same pockets of Trump voters in these states. If such pockets did exist, they would have existed in varying sizes in each of the four states, thus resulting in different sized wins in each.

Ask any statistician and they’ll tell you that a reasonable distribution of the results would have been Trump winning one of the states by one percent, won one of them by perhaps three percent, won one of them by two percent, lost one of them by one percent, or something along those lines. But instead the voting tallies looked startlingly different from any natural distribution. In fact they looked startlingly the same.

According to the New York Times, the voting results broke down like this: Trump won Florida by just over one percent of the vote. He also won Pennsylvania by just over one percent. He won Michigan by just under one percent. And he won Wisconsin by precisely one percent. That’s not how numbers tend to work in the real world.

On its own, this kind of suspiciously consistent numerical dispersion across the four states that decided the election would be something that could be written off as a mere fluke. But when you put it within the context of the numerous other ways in which the voting tallies make no mathematical sense, it points to the numbers having been rigged or altered.

Amaryllis

(9,524 posts)
25. Yep, we are all supposed to believe that becasue the party line is no vote totals were changed.
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 08:53 PM
Sep 2017

Don't have to change them if you prevent them from being either cast or counted .

Eko

(7,272 posts)
27. From what I understand
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:00 PM
Sep 2017

the voting machines are not hooked up to the internet, so they cant be hacked that way. In person, yes, but not otherwise. Now voter databases being tampered with, yes. Change party affiliation, mark someone dead, change their address. Probably was done. That being said the votes wouldn't be altered, just the ability to vote. Bad also.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
31. This Is 100% Wrong!
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:15 PM
Sep 2017

The machines have to upload their data results, and there is definitely an internet connection between them and the central tabulators.

This article explains: https://www.verifiedvoting.org/which-voting-machines-can-be-hacked-through-the-internet/

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
40. This is where my concern lies.
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 10:43 PM
Sep 2017

Some company manufacturers the voting machine and installs software or operating system whatever the heck you want to call it. That installation could be where the hacks actually occur.

Think they might have Kaspersky virus protection?

Eko

(7,272 posts)
37. From your link.
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:31 PM
Sep 2017

"To hack a voting machine remotely, you might think it has to be plugged in to the Internet. Most voting machines are never plugged directly into the Internet. But all voting machines must accept electronic input files from other computers: these “ballot definition files” tell the vote-counting program which candidates are on the ballot. These files are transferred to the voting machine, before each election, by inserting a cartridge or memory card into the voting machine. These cartridges are prepared on an Election Management System (EMS) computer. If that computer is hacked, then it can prepare fraudulent ballot-definition cartridges. Are those EMS computers ever connected to the Internet? Most of them probably are, from time to time; it’s hard to tell for sure, given the equivocations of many election administrators."

doesn't sound 100% wrong at all. Maybe some? Maybe none? Maybe they are plugged in to update and then a secure scan is done to check for malware? Its hard to tell for sure.

Eko

(7,272 posts)
39. Your link also said nothing about
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:36 PM
Sep 2017

the voting machines having a internet connection between them and the central tabulators. Not that this doesn't happen, I certainly don't know everything but not presenting any evidence for it leads me to doubt it.

BigmanPigman

(51,582 posts)
14. 45 puts all of his efforts and $ to prevent fair voting (ACA Koboch)
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 12:53 PM
Sep 2017

but nothing to stop Russia or gerrymandering.

 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
16. I think voter selection/electoral fraud should be punishable by death
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 01:32 PM
Sep 2017

I’m serious. I think it should be considered as serious a crime as treason.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
21. Considering that it means 32 million without healthcare
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 03:14 PM
Sep 2017

Yeah, I would agree with you. Not to mention it does actually fit the definition of treason.

 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
22. Plus the wrong person, put in through cheating, could lead to worldwide nuclear war.
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 03:40 PM
Sep 2017

Like what might very well happen thanks to Donald Dumbfornicate.

CottonBear

(21,596 posts)
18. GA SoS, Brian Kemp (R), dismissed previous reports as "fake news."
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 02:44 PM
Sep 2017

Last edited Thu Sep 21, 2017, 07:59 PM - Edit history (1)

Surprise, surprise, surprise, He's running for Governor of Georgia while (supposedly) working as Secretary of State to guarantee fair elections using our statewide, 100% Diebold machines.

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
19. Investigate, prosecute, incarcerate russian-republican TreasonWeasels
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 02:46 PM
Sep 2017

who have betrayed America and American democracy.

broadcaster90210

(333 posts)
26. Our government is illigitmate across the board
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 08:56 PM
Sep 2017

We need a new system. Completely. What we have needs to be torn down and rebuilt. If we accept this illigitimate government, we get what we deserve.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
28. Explain Why Voting Matters
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:11 PM
Sep 2017

I've been attacked for saying that there is little reason to bother voting, or even supporting the political process, when there is absolutely no reason to trust the validity of the election results.

If machines can and probably have FIXED several elections in my lifetime, what real point is there? And when the Democratic party just sits by and allows it to happen, why should they be supported? They're as guilty as the ones STEALING the elections. At best they're a pathetic Charlie Brown to the repubs Lucy and her football.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
33. I have zero doubt all 50 states were compromised and the voting was tampered with
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:21 PM
Sep 2017

We just don't have confirmation yet but I'm absolutely certain of it.

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
35. The FBI says as many as 39 states had their voting systems scanned or targeted by Russia.
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:27 PM
Sep 2017

But, but, but OP ....

There was a poster yesterday who said such talk was hopeless and HOGWASH, and that NO votes were changed by the ruskies.

Oh, and that Bernie would have beaten tRumputin EASILY.



garybeck

(9,940 posts)
42. Problem with the headline of the article
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 12:14 AM
Sep 2017

Paper ballots are not enough. Without random audits paper ballots accomplish nothing

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The FBI says as many as 3...