Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:10 AM Jul 2012

The Slick “No Labels” Plan to Duck Debate, Cut Social Security and Coddle The 1%

http://www.nationofchange.org/slick-no-labels-plan-duck-debate-cut-social-security-and-coddle-1-1342537940

“Labeling would tell them that the group was designed and created by and for political backs from both parties, who scrupulously hide their funding sources but are associated with people like anti-Social Security billionaire Pete Peterson.”
The Slick “No Labels” Plan to Duck Debate, Cut Social Security and Coddle The 1%

“Why won't you publish your list of donors?”

“What's wrong with having legislators debate the issues publicly? Isn't that how representative democracy works?“

“How can you call yourself 'centrist' when so many of your ideas are unpopular, and in fact are too conservative for most Tea Party members?”

He might have another question, too:

“What's wrong with labels? Don't they let us know what we're buying?”

No Labels is just one small cadre in a great army of mercenaries pushing the austerity cause. Their brigades have colorful (that is to say, silly) names like “Americans Elect,” “I.O.U.S.A,” the “Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget,” and my personal favorite, “Budgetball” - which I like to think of as 'The Fountainhead' Meets 'Deathrace 2000'.”

Even if every one of these groups fails individually - which so far they all have - the hope seems to be that they'll have the cumulative effect of making it look like there's a tidal wave of support for Simpson Bowles austerity.

These programs uniformly attempt to stigmatize the majority's opinions and interests as “extreme.” These front groups always try to stigmatize the popular goals of protecting Social Security and Medicare benefits and fighting Simpson Bowles austerity as those of a “tiny minority” which “ruthlessly punishes those who step out of line.”

There's a word for a political system where politicians face dire consequences for defying the will and interests of the people. That word is “democracy.”

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Slick “No Labels” Plan to Duck Debate, Cut Social Security and Coddle The 1% (Original Post) eridani Jul 2012 OP
'The Fountainhead' Meets 'Deathrace 2000,' LOL! pinboy3niner Jul 2012 #1

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
1. 'The Fountainhead' Meets 'Deathrace 2000,' LOL!
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:16 AM
Jul 2012

Simpson Bowles is like a zombie--it just keeps coming back, even though its own committee wouldn't adopt it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Slick “No Labels” Pla...