General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT: The Rush to Abandon the Poor
I feel ashamed this is happening; do these people have no shame?
The Rush to Abandon the Poor
Published: July 17, 2012
The state with the countrys worst health care record just happens to have a governor who has been the loudest voice against national efforts to improve it.
A quarter of the residents of Texas, 6.3 million people, are uninsured, by far the highest percentage in the country. (That number includes more than a million children.) Texas ranks last in prenatal care and finished last on a new federal assessment of overall health quality that examined factors like disease prevention, deaths from illnesses, and cancer treatment.
Yet Gov. Rick Perry strangely puffed up as he was so often in his presidential bid recently told the Obama administration that he would proudly refuse a huge infusion of Medicaid money that would significantly reduce those shameful statistics and cover 1.7 million more people. The same indifference to suffering that pushed Texas to the bottom is now threatening to keep it there.
At least five other Republican governors have made a similar choice, announcing that they will not expand their Medicaid program for the poor even though the federal government would pay for almost all of it for several years under President Obamas health care reform law.
Their refusal illuminates a growing divide over the nature of a state governments role. Around the country, a new study shows, states continue to face a fiscal crisis because of rising costs and Republican-driven cuts in federal aid.
more...
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/18/opinion/the-rush-to-abandon-the-poor.html?_r=1
ananda
(28,834 posts)Can they buy politicians, legislators, and courts?
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)when they have managed to rise to the attention of the elites. Until they do, they will continue to be ground to dust under the heels of the rich and their two political parties.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)"would pay for almost all of it for several years" is the problem in the "out years"?
Is it the fear that down the road the federal government will walk away from medicaid forcing state's to take on the cost?
I ask because that was the form of the argument used by Scott Walker to kill high-speed rail here in Wisconsin.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)It's just another republican party of NO -game that they are playing.
May they all rot in hell with the banksters
liberalmuse
(18,671 posts)A nation that doesn't care for the least of its citizens is corrupt and unworthy of respect or good standing in the world.
dkf
(37,305 posts)It's all coming down on the poor, because there will be no funds for discretionary spending.
We are going to crowd out everything else including defense spending, education, and research.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)It just makes me a little nauseated to see all this concern, while we blithely sleepwalk into our sad future reality.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)They are the 99%. If and when they quit voting for Perry, hr will be gone.