General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsToo soon to start talking about shutting Facebook down?
Facebook now admits that the Russians used them to manipulate public opinion for the election. Maybe in the spirit of patriotism, they should voluntarily shut down until they get their technology under control.
TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)How about they cooperate fully with the FBI, and then donate...say...two billion dollars to the DNC to atone for their treason, and then we'll talk about further actions.
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)Fuckerberg is laughing all the way to the bank. He is a lying traitor!
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)campaign finance (courts) and that is the way it is. All of this is not important...if you didn't want to believe the lies you didn't...people mostly deceived themselves. I am on facebook, twitter etc. I certainly was not voting GOP no matter who said what...this is about people trying to blame facebook for their own foolishness in not voting for the Democratic candidate and unleashing Trump upon us.
lindysalsagal
(20,663 posts)Because you'll have a harder time pulling down facebook than all the rest.
Demtexan
(1,588 posts)Do not miss it.
Orrex
(63,200 posts)TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)I think he's more likely to notice if one of his numerous serfs forgets to stock his medicine cabinet with pimple cream.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Demtexan
(1,588 posts)It did to me.
Other people can do it.
It not like someone has to be on Facebook.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)to counter all the fake stuff that ends up there.
Demtexan
(1,588 posts)I received so many Trump feeds I was blocking everything.
I left before the election.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)And I hardly know anyone who is an open Trump supporter, though I try to keep an open door to Republicans who might be unhappy with him. Recently, I heard from a young woman, the wife of one of my son's friends in another state. She is the daughter of an FBI retiree and seems pretty conservative. But she wrote me privately to thank me for my posts and to tell me how much she hates DT and what a terrible model he is for her son.
Demtexan
(1,588 posts)I do not miss it and would not feel right being on it anymore.
After finding out what happened on Facebook during the election I am glad I left.
I text people or call them on the phone.
My life has not changed any.
I also do not have any more Trump crap to block.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)These ads were also on Gmail, Twitter, Youtube, and other platforms.
The problem is so much bigger than Facebook. We've only seen the tip of the iceberg.
Demtexan
(1,588 posts)Unless I have to.
I found Facebook a pain with all Trump crap.
I would get into it with Trump supporters.
I do not miss that either.
I am not surprised with all the information about Russia and Facebook.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)More information is coming out every day on Russia's penetration of the internet. I don't see how anyone leading a typical western life could avoid exposure completely.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/add-google-to-the-list-of-tech-companies-used-by-russians-to-spread-disinformation/2017/10/09/87f6bbaa-ad11-11e7-99c6-46bdf7f6f8ba_story.html?utm_term=.15ffcb627f46
Google discovered the Russian presence on its platforms by siphoning data from Twitter, the people familiar with Googles investigation said. Twitter offers outsiders the ability to access a small amount of historical tweets free, and charges developers for access to the entire Twitter fire hose of data stemming back to 2006.
Google downloaded the data from Twitter and was able to link Russian Twitter accounts to other accounts that had used Googles services to buy ads, the people said. This was done without the explicit cooperation of Twitter, the people said.
Googles probe is in its early stages, the people said. Google is continuing to examine its own records and also is sharing data with Facebook.
Response to Demtexan (Reply #19)
m-lekktor This message was self-deleted by its author.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)and FB was shut down all at once? 1.5 billion people would suddenly have nothing better to do than flood the streets in protest of Dotard. I say we do it!
MousePlayingDaffodil
(748 posts). . . the American people can resolve to be more discerning, to not succumb to ridiculous propaganda, to think for themselves as individuals and not ascribe to a herd mentality, and thus not allow public opinion to be manipulated in the first place. I don't think that's all too much to ask of a people with pretensions to self-governance. But, hey, maybe it is.
brer cat
(24,557 posts)Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)world wide wally
(21,740 posts)TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)How anti-cigarette groups forced the tobacco companies to pay for one anti-smoking ad for every two pro-smoking ads using the Fairness Doctrine. The anti-smoking ads were so effective that eventually the tobacco industry actually lobbied Congress to make cigarette ads illegal. We could have done the same thing with gun control. No wonder Reagan was so hot to get rid of the Fairness Doctrine.
But I remember those cool, anti-smoking ads from you youth. They were pretty cute. This was one of my favourites.
catrose
(5,065 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)at least 1 year prior to the next election.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)Should we shut down the whole internet?
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Boggle; all were instrumental in over-throwing our last election.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)We probably only know about the tip of the iceberg at this point.
Do you plan to boycott Google?
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Unsubscribed to fakebook. Sh'tter is next on the chopping block. Social media is one of the most destructive forces in our society and culture.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)n/t.....
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)Or pretty much any other part of the internet.
Those of you who can do without it, great. Others don't Tweet or don't own a TV or a car and likewise get along just fine.
But I have to add this personal note. Earlier this year I had a death in the family, and had it not been for FB it would have been days before any of us would have found out. Thanks to FB the news got out quickly, as well as news of memorial services in two different parts of the country. Had it not been for FB there would be people who would just now be learning of that death, and saying, "OMG! That person died in June and I'm just now finding out?"
And here's the real underlying thing to think about. Facebook merely did what lots of other businesses do. They accepted paid advertising. Which isn't a crime. Heck, this site accepts ads and I have a star membership so I don't have to see them, but every so often someone here will post something along the lines of "Why in the hell am I seeing THAT ad??"
I can't imagine what sort of "getting their technology under control" would be a solution. An essential problem is that too many people believe all sorts of things uncritically. It happens here all the time. Few people take the time to think about what they've read and ask if it makes sense at all.
Plus, is there any reason to believe that Facebook actually colluded with Russia in that manipulation?
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)about who's paying for them that is required on TV and radio ads.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)group fell hard for the lies about Hillary because they wanted to believe it...nothing can fix stupid. I agree ...we should know who sponsors all ads...but I doubt we can force it.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)is evenly divided between Dems and R's at this point and they're at a stand-off -- and the original regulations didn't envision an internet. But there's no reason that political ads on Facebook and other American companies couldn't be regulated the same way other ads are.
hunter
(38,310 posts)Those who haven't suicided or blocked my radical leftist environmentalist extremist ass.
mrs_p
(3,014 posts)Accounts today. DU is my only forum now.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)Those are some of the ones we know about, but more are named every day.
mrs_p
(3,014 posts)pnwmom
(108,974 posts)to the alt-right.
No, thanks. I'm going to stay online and work to counter them.
mrs_p
(3,014 posts)The way you want and I'll live mine.
Not sure why people care what I do online anyway.
For me, I also have to think of my career. I can't be free to express myself any way I want as it is too easy on FB and Twitter to be outed, professionally.
Here, I can be anonymous. At least for now.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)mrs_p
(3,014 posts)LeftInTX
(25,231 posts)As a matter of fact, people who aren't on FB struggle to keep up with all the activities. My FB calendar is full of activities.
I also keep up with my relatives who live in different states and different parts of the world.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)Redditt, 4Chan, Youtube, and nobody knows how many other platforms.
We only know about the tip of the iceberg.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)official business. emergencies only. Use the White House website and DOTgov websites ONLY.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)double aged sword...maybe people shouldn't believe every piece of bullshit they read online. There will always be gullible people in the electorate.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Meh.
JustAnotherGen
(31,810 posts)obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)xor
(1,204 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)he recommended cutting my leg off above the knee as a solution! That you Doc?
Its not like some other Facebook like company will come along and take their place right!
get the red out
(13,461 posts)If all this hurts their bottom line and stock prices, there could be changes at the top. $$$ talks.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)They let it happen.
They helped it.
They actively helped.
They lied about it.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Make sure Ford and IBM are banned as well as many other companies that worked with Nazi's back in the day as well.
I especially love the whole "destroy all social media" approach that really proves that folks just don't get it with how interwoven it is to everything these days, from education to business to government to relationships.
The tool isn't the issue, the use of it is. But this is a hyperbolic throwing out the baby with the bath water mindset that too many around these parts have.
samnsara
(17,615 posts)...captivated by it that I needed to be on it constantly. I may post political stuff daily but I rarely go on to read friends posts etc. If FB shut down there would be a MASSIVE uproar. Ppl wouldnt care WHY its shut down, they just know they cant check THEIR friends status or post what THEY ate that day blah blah. I was on a cruise (a ship on the ocean surrounded by big water)..and internet use is like $$ per minute... and I would be in the crows nest/lounge toasting each whale breach and ppl are glued to their FB!
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,323 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Yeah, let's shut down a communication channel used by over a quarter of the earth's populuation, because some dumb people didn't factcheck things they read before believing it.
Ok then..
xor
(1,204 posts)They'll eventually get some creepy AI profiling system up and running, though. Then we'll see reduction in troll farm posts, but we'll still have to contend with the real life idiots. But feel free to close all your social media accounts.