Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 02:01 PM Jul 2012

Why no returns before 2010? One good guess:

November 18, 2009
14,700 Disclosed Offshore Accounts

By LYNNLEY BROWNING
Fear, apparently, can be a powerful inducement.

The Internal Revenue Service said Tuesday that more that 14,700 Americans had been attracted to an amnesty program in recent months and disclosed their secret foreign bank accounts — many more than had been attracted to a previous I.R.S. program.

And the reason, Justice Department and I.R.S. officials said, was the widespread publicity about the agreement in February by the Swiss banking giant UBS to pay $780 million and admit to criminal wrongdoing in selling offshore banking services that had enabled tax evasion. In August, under legal pressure, UBS agreed to turn over the names of about 4,450 American clients suspected by the I.R.S. of using the bank’s offshore services to evade taxes.

UBS clients who did not come forward and whose names are on the bank’s list of accounts face back taxes and fines that can exceed what they own, as well as potential prosecution and jail time.

So it was probably not a surprise that many of the 14,700 who were lured to the I.R.S. amnesty program were UBS clients.

“We have now gained access to thousands of taxpayers and bank accounts that we have never had before,” Douglas H. Shulman, the I.R.S. commissioner, told a news conference on Tuesday.

Last month, the I.R.S. said that 7,500 taxpayers from dozens of banks, including UBS, had come forward as the Oct. 15 disclosure deadline approached, agreeing to repatriate the assets and pay back taxes and interest as well as reduced penalties.


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/business/global/18irs.html

Anybody want to bet that one of those 14,700 names is very familiar? Whaddaya say -- $10,000?
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why no returns before 2010? One good guess: (Original Post) Proud Public Servant Jul 2012 OP
very interesting thought! unblock Jul 2012 #1
Which is why I think Proud Public Servant Jul 2012 #2

unblock

(52,123 posts)
1. very interesting thought!
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 02:42 PM
Jul 2012

so many possibilities, so hard to guess the right one.

all we know for sure is that rmoney feels the speculation and the crap he's getting for not coming clean is better than the crap he'll get if we ever found out the truth....

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
2. Which is why I think
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 02:54 PM
Jul 2012

this might be it. Mitt being someone who took advantage of illegal tax havens, then owned up to it during an amnesty to get off lightly, would be the worse possible narrative, far worse than just paying no taxes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why no returns before 201...