Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:32 PM
Baconator (1,459 posts)
The Democratic Party has an age problem
Democratic leaders across both the legislative and executive branches are generally older than leadership on the other side of the aisle, leading to some restlessness among the lower ranks who have been patiently awaiting their turn at the top.
The most recent blow to those hoping to climb the ranks? Dianne Feinstein, 84, the oldest senator currently serving in the chamber, just announced a bid for re-election to the seat she's held for two and a half decades. The presidential field also looks like an uphill climb for young Democrats: apart from a couple of standout young senators, names like Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden still loom large among the potential hopefuls. Part of the problem for Democrats is one of recruiting. Historic losses over the last decade in statehouses across the country have not helped create a bench of energized new lawmakers. Further Democrats have had difficulty winning new seats in the House since the tea party wave of 2010 and redistricting in the wake of that year's census http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/10/politics/democrats-age-problem/index.html?CNNPolitics=fb _____________________________________ Data and more info at the page. Limited by 4 paragraph copy rule. Posted in GD as I don't think this qualifies as news. This is not a slam on anyone so much as an attempt to help folks understand what it's going to take to stop Trump in 2020.
|
67 replies, 7475 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Baconator | Oct 2017 | OP |
greymattermom | Oct 2017 | #1 | |
JI7 | Oct 2017 | #2 | |
octoberlib | Oct 2017 | #59 | |
shanny | Oct 2017 | #37 | |
Binkie The Clown | Oct 2017 | #3 | |
snowybirdie | Oct 2017 | #14 | |
RKP5637 | Oct 2017 | #17 | |
marybourg | Oct 2017 | #35 | |
Binkie The Clown | Oct 2017 | #36 | |
nini | Oct 2017 | #4 | |
elleng | Oct 2017 | #7 | |
nini | Oct 2017 | #11 | |
Willie Pep | Oct 2017 | #16 | |
TheFrenchRazor | Oct 2017 | #26 | |
cloudbase | Oct 2017 | #30 | |
Willie Pep | Oct 2017 | #10 | |
nini | Oct 2017 | #13 | |
awesomerwb1 | Oct 2017 | #58 | |
nini | Oct 2017 | #62 | |
LisaM | Oct 2017 | #5 | |
elleng | Oct 2017 | #9 | |
LisaM | Oct 2017 | #12 | |
crazycatlady | Oct 2017 | #49 | |
Willie Pep | Oct 2017 | #6 | |
sheshe2 | Oct 2017 | #20 | |
NurseJackie | Oct 2017 | #44 | |
sheshe2 | Oct 2017 | #47 | |
lunasun | Oct 2017 | #27 | |
spanone | Oct 2017 | #8 | |
liberal N proud | Oct 2017 | #15 | |
LenaBaby61 | Oct 2017 | #32 | |
spanone | Oct 2017 | #33 | |
crazycatlady | Oct 2017 | #50 | |
loyalsister | Oct 2017 | #61 | |
samnsara | Oct 2017 | #18 | |
Baconator | Oct 2017 | #19 | |
Blue_Tires | Oct 2017 | #21 | |
shanny | Oct 2017 | #38 | |
Blue_Tires | Oct 2017 | #52 | |
shanny | Oct 2017 | #56 | |
Squinch | Oct 2017 | #22 | |
Baconator | Oct 2017 | #24 | |
Squinch | Oct 2017 | #25 | |
TheFrenchRazor | Oct 2017 | #28 | |
Baconator | Oct 2017 | #41 | |
crazycatlady | Oct 2017 | #51 | |
JI7 | Oct 2017 | #39 | |
delisen | Oct 2017 | #23 | |
bluestarone | Oct 2017 | #29 | |
Me. | Oct 2017 | #31 | |
pnwmom | Oct 2017 | #34 | |
msongs | Oct 2017 | #40 | |
Scruffy1 | Oct 2017 | #55 | |
FSogol | Oct 2017 | #42 | |
Baconator | Oct 2017 | #43 | |
FSogol | Oct 2017 | #45 | |
Squinch | Oct 2017 | #65 | |
Baconator | Oct 2017 | #66 | |
treestar | Oct 2017 | #46 | |
MineralMan | Oct 2017 | #48 | |
doc03 | Oct 2017 | #53 | |
LonePirate | Oct 2017 | #54 | |
left-of-center2012 | Oct 2017 | #57 | |
frazzled | Oct 2017 | #60 | |
Initech | Oct 2017 | #67 | |
ucrdem | Oct 2017 | #63 | |
LexVegas | Oct 2017 | #64 |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:34 PM
greymattermom (5,722 posts)
1. Love Jon Ossoff
and we need more like him.
|
Response to greymattermom (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:36 PM
JI7 (87,755 posts)
2. Too bad those who complain about age didn't do much to support him
Response to JI7 (Reply #2)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 11:19 AM
octoberlib (14,956 posts)
59. Bingo. I'd suggest they actually start voting especially during mid-terms.
If they don't like the candidates on offer then they should run themselves.
|
Response to greymattermom (Reply #1)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:11 AM
shanny (6,709 posts)
37. The guy who--according to Joy Reid--
did everything except run as a Republican and yet under-performed Hillary in his district? That guy?
I disagree and so does Charles Pierce, who says it way better. http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a12781302/democrats-alabama-mississippi-progressives/ |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:38 PM
Binkie The Clown (7,911 posts)
3. The elderly are always struggling to keep the youngsters from rising in the ranks.
And I say this as an elderly person myself. Personally, when I retired I was all too happy to turn the reigns over to the younger generation. It's time for the old folks to step aside and let the next generation take over.
|
Response to Binkie The Clown (Reply #3)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:50 PM
snowybirdie (4,501 posts)
14. I agree
We WWII generation folks also want younger ideas and actions coming up. Time for the next guys to take over.
|
Response to snowybirdie (Reply #14)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:00 PM
RKP5637 (64,943 posts)
17. Agree!!! n/t
Response to Binkie The Clown (Reply #3)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 11:24 PM
marybourg (11,473 posts)
35. Well, since all us old folks
agree that we want to see young people take over, then it can't really be true that "the elderly are always struggling to keep the youngsters from rising in the ranks."j
|
Response to marybourg (Reply #35)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:06 AM
Binkie The Clown (7,911 posts)
36. O.K., then SOME old folks cling to power long after they should retire and
let the more energetic youngsters take over and bring fresh ideas to the mix.
To quote Max Planck (even though his subject was physics, and not politics...) A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. The same principle applies to political ideas. |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:38 PM
nini (16,632 posts)
4. You know what pisses me off about these kinds of posts?
Is this notion that it's age. It's far more than that. I for one like experience and people I agree with but beyond that we are up against.:
Fox News Gerrymandering Racists Christian right wing fanatics Corrupt media etc etc etc The youthful Democrats will rise. Kamala Harris, Joe Kennedy III, etc are getting noticed. There is something to be said of our Dems in positions of power and I'll be god damned if I want to see that lost. I've got my flameproof chonies on so fire away! |
Response to nini (Reply #4)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:43 PM
elleng (122,970 posts)
7. I REALLY like experience.
Thanks.
|
Response to elleng (Reply #7)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:46 PM
nini (16,632 posts)
11. I absolutely love Kennedy and Harris and I do hope they run or get in the mix for President
But I just can't go to not looking at older powerful Dems either.
|
Response to elleng (Reply #7)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:55 PM
Willie Pep (841 posts)
16. Politics is the one area where experience is a negative to some people.
But if you think about it this prejudice makes no sense. Politics is a job like any other in the sense that you have to learn the ropes and gain experience to become good at it. People saw Trump's lack of experience as a good thing because he is a "maverick" and an "outsider" but look how that has turned out. It is like hiring a mechanic who says "I know nothing about cars but I have a lot of energy and I yell a lot so hire me!" Sadly, for some people Clinton's decades of public experience meant that she was a "hack." Nobody ever calls mechanics with decades of dutiful service a "hack" but here we are.
|
Response to Willie Pep (Reply #16)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 10:05 PM
TheFrenchRazor (2,116 posts)
26. true; experience, not just in politics, but in life generally, is important. nt
Response to TheFrenchRazor (Reply #26)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 10:19 PM
cloudbase (5,021 posts)
30. It's great if the person actually absorbs the lessons of that experience.
I've worked with people who claimed many years of experience, but in reality had one year of experience
many times. |
Response to nini (Reply #4)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:46 PM
Willie Pep (841 posts)
10. The Republicans have built up powerful political machines.
Koch Brothers dark money, the Tea Party, and gerrymandering. It has little to do with age by itself. In my area the local Dems ran a young, professional, attractive candidate against an entrenched, older Republican with a strong machine behind him and she got creamed despite her many postives. We need to stop looking at demographics and image as the beginning and end of everything and go back to street-level politics and old school precinct work.
|
Response to Willie Pep (Reply #10)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:48 PM
nini (16,632 posts)
13. I agree completely
We need to fire up the base, take over local/state seats..congressional seats as we can.
They set this nightmare in place 40 years ago during Reagan's days. They have brainwashed half of the country. Our half needs to get off their butts - show up and get to work. |
Response to nini (Reply #13)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 11:12 AM
awesomerwb1 (4,110 posts)
58. Yes, I agree
And I think that highlights the problem with Dems. Poor leadership.
We need to learn from the mistakes of the past. Need to better organize, communicate, and act. Don't get me wrong, I see that from awesome outside groups, but they have limited funds and we all have to work together. There's a whole lot of anger out there but it's too divided. Right now, it should be everyone for country and against the Cheeto nutters. A lot of egos on the left "leadership". Wouldn't put it past the Dems to not be able to channel this huge anger into results in 2018. The longer the reps are in power, the harder it will be to beat them in the future. And we don't want a 3-7 or 2-8 supreme court in the next few years either do we? |
Response to awesomerwb1 (Reply #58)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 11:54 AM
nini (16,632 posts)
62. I could bring up the real reason
But it would start a fight on last year's election cycle so I'm not taking the bait.
|
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:39 PM
LisaM (27,115 posts)
5. What's happened at the state level is extremely harmful in this regard.
People are getting gerrymandered out of even trying.
EMILY's List has been trying hard to recruit women to run and create a new pool of women candidates, but I don't know anything about the demographics of what they've attracted so far. |
Response to LisaM (Reply #5)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:44 PM
elleng (122,970 posts)
9. It's BEEN happening.
Response to elleng (Reply #9)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:48 PM
LisaM (27,115 posts)
12. I agree!
We seem to either have fifteen candidates running for a position, or one. This means that there is some disorganization somewhere. In a lot of our races, they're taking the top two candidates, no matter the party, and I don't think that's working very well. If it's a safe district for one party, you get almost no one in the other party and then in my congressional district last year, we ended up with two good Dems running against each other so you knew one would lose. I'd rather they ran for different offices or maybe one moved a few miles away or something.
|
Response to LisaM (Reply #12)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:59 AM
crazycatlady (4,492 posts)
49. There's a district in upstate NY that has something like 8-9 Dems running in the primary
While I'm happy they're all excited to take on a GOP incumbent, I think that in that part of NY (haven't done the research so I don't know for sure) there's many other positions that some of these candidates can fill. County leg, County executive (multi county district), State assembly, state senate, etc. They should be running for these lower positions too.
|
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:41 PM
Willie Pep (841 posts)
6. I don't think age is the problem.
Bernie Sanders is the most popular politician in the country and he is in his 70s. People are living longer and are more capable in old age now so it is not surprising that many politicians are still active well into their golden years. Plus, I see age as a sign of experience. For some reason politics seems to be the one area where some people see experience as a negative but we need people who can work within the system and know the system to get stuff done.
The Democrats need to develop younger politicians for the future but I am not on board with dumping older politicians and pushing young ones just "because." We already have age discrimination in the workplace we don't need it in politics. |
Response to Willie Pep (Reply #6)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:32 PM
sheshe2 (78,286 posts)
20. The Harvard Harris poll again?
Please stop.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-bernie-sanders-is-most-popular-u-s-politician/ The survey found that 57 percent of the public view the Vermont independent favorably while 32 percent said they view Sanders unfavorably. Hillary Clinton defeated Sanders in the Democratic primary for president last year. The next two most popular politicians among the public are Vice President Mike Pence and President Trump -- each with 44 percent viewing them favorably. ............................ Bogus poll. Debunked as such. |
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #20)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:49 AM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
44. We can learn a lot about those who continue to cite it...
Bogus poll. Debunked as such. We can learn a lot about those who continue to cite it, and it reveals much more than they probably realize, and it's not at all flattering. It suggests to me that some people hold truth and accuracy as mere secondary concerns. And, frankly, I just find that to be a bit sad. I can't even get angry about it any more. It's still annoying, that's for sure.. but mostly sad.
![]() |
Response to Willie Pep (Reply #6)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 10:10 PM
lunasun (21,646 posts)
27. Experience is a plus to support . I agree it's not age and as far as getting votes and winning
look at republicans like John McCain and. McConnell who get reelected . Trump is 70.
Republicans don't seem to mind |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:43 PM
spanone (133,409 posts)
8. and yet....Donald Trump is the oldest president elected in US history
Response to spanone (Reply #8)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 08:55 PM
liberal N proud (59,676 posts)
15. Go figure
Response to spanone (Reply #8)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 10:22 PM
LenaBaby61 (6,394 posts)
32. "And yet....Donald Trump is the oldest president elected in US history."
Yep, thuglicans don't have an age problem.
And, as long as they can gerrymander, voter-suppress, collect and count the votes, get the ruskies involved and meddling into our elections and take away the power of Democrats to vote, they can run an old, orange, racist, sexist, fascistic Methuselah in fatso tRumputin and STILL win the presidency ![]() ANY young Dem can be done the SAME way as Hillary was done (And treated in a sexist way if the person running for POTUS is a woman). Like ANY Democrat would be immune to GOP cheating and ruskie meddling, and especially with that pig tRumputin installed into the White House (with putin as his Lord and Master) and with a thuglican Congress? Hey OP, did you know that the Department of Homeland Security STILL only has an acting Secretary of that department (Elaine Duke) heading it? tRump, putin and most in this GOP-lead Congress are in NO hurry to appoint a permanent Secretary of Homeland Security, and as we know, the Department of Homeland Security has a LOT to do with voting across this country. |
Response to LenaBaby61 (Reply #32)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 10:01 AM
crazycatlady (4,492 posts)
50. The GOP has a bench of younger candidates
They have a bench full of Gen X governors, senators, and other key leadership positions. I may not like them but they're light years ahead of the Democrats in that regard.
I can't think of very many Democrats with national potential that were born after 1960 (a few but nothing like the GOP in this category). |
Response to crazycatlady (Reply #50)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 11:51 AM
loyalsister (13,390 posts)
61. I noticed that trend beginning in the early 2000s
New gen Xer legislators in the MO GA were overwhelmingly republican. A republican gen Xer was elected governor in '04 and another last yr. The Gen xers grew up in the Reagan yrs, televangelism, and prosperity gospel. I have also noticed it among my peers whose minds seem to be intellectually saturated with Reagan era stigmatization of poor people, as well as the greediness of the 80s and early 90s.
There are exceptions, but I have noticed that among active democrats I see at fundraisers and other events. There is an age gap with the liberal baby boomers and the younger Gen Xers and millennials the majority. And very few in the middle (now in their mid 40s - early 50s). Congress looks similar. Paul Ryan's fellow Ayn Rand followers, started in their 30s and are reaching the prime age for elected leadership now. Fortunately, they have opposition in the form of a younger, very committed liberal up and comers. We desperately need them and those who have been around for awhile really need to be thinking about the future and mentoring newbies rather than focus on winning elections and their last hurrahs. |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:03 PM
samnsara (16,902 posts)
18. im all for experience!!!!
..we need a tried and true warrior to fight this next battle.
|
Response to samnsara (Reply #18)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:29 PM
Baconator (1,459 posts)
19. ... and then they die
... and a gap opens up instead of a natural progression.
We're essentially two generations inbetween now... Add to that the trouble an 85 year old has relating to someone in their 20s. How much can you expect from someone who literally doesn't have to live with the consequences of their actions? |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:34 PM
Blue_Tires (55,445 posts)
21. Kamala Harris tried to stand up
but the purity Dems smothered her with lightning quick speed...
Feinstein holding on to a safe seat isn't a problem, if they party youth are going to make some noise it needs to be in purple/red seats |
Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #21)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:21 AM
shanny (6,709 posts)
38. ...
https://newrepublic.com/article/144230/lefts-misguided-debate-kamala-harris
Depends on the purity in question I guess...or do you consider The New Republic far left? |
Response to shanny (Reply #38)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 10:15 AM
Blue_Tires (55,445 posts)
52. And just who might you be?
The sooner the Dem punditsphere realizes there's no magical candidate with a 100% pristine past and who is 100% aligned with DU on every political issue, the better...
|
Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #52)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 10:46 AM
shanny (6,709 posts)
56. ??? Did you read the article?
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:38 PM
Squinch (47,395 posts)
22. Another bullshit "Democrats are doing it all wrong" article that actually even includes the
following statement:
Hillary Clinton won voters under 30 years old by nearly 20 percentage points, while Donald Trump won voters over 65 years old by 7 points, according to exit polls.
So they are arguing against their own thesis. |
Response to Squinch (Reply #22)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:48 PM
Baconator (1,459 posts)
24. Waiting until those folks die out is likely not the best strategy...
I'm just not that patient...
|
Response to Baconator (Reply #24)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:50 PM
Squinch (47,395 posts)
25. No one is waiting until those folks die out, and we have a great stable of younger congresspeople.
It's just bullshit.
|
Response to Baconator (Reply #24)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 10:11 PM
TheFrenchRazor (2,116 posts)
28. so you think older people should just "step aside" in favor of less experienced, less knowlegeable
younger people, because they're impatient and want to be able to skip to front of the line? young people can work for it, just like evreybody else, IMO.
|
Response to TheFrenchRazor (Reply #28)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:43 AM
Baconator (1,459 posts)
41. It's not skipping the line...
That's kind of the point.
What happens when there's responsible change is that those younger people gain their experience while they are still young enough to do something about it. It's a very real concern that someone approaching their 90s has some ideas and parts of their personality set and can't understand the challenges that someone in their 20s is facing. Anyone have a depression era grandparent who took bread from other tables at the restaurant and put it in their purse? That's the only way they know how to be because they were formed in a completely different time. No one is saying that Diane Feinstein has to hand the keys over to a 22-year-old aide either btw... |
Response to TheFrenchRazor (Reply #28)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 10:09 AM
crazycatlady (4,492 posts)
51. Would you rather have people retire or leave office in a body bag?
I see an 84 yo running for senate and I'm constantly reminded of the fiasco that came with filling Senator Lautenberg's seat after his death.
|
Response to Squinch (Reply #22)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:34 AM
JI7 (87,755 posts)
39. also, the only republican in recent years who has been able to get some young voters was Ron Paul
and nobody is supporting Paul Ryan.
people keep talking about the ages of the republicans but young people are not supporting them. it's old people who support the republican party far more. it just makes no sense. it goes against facts. |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:38 PM
delisen (5,829 posts)
23. The problem is not attending to winning
non-presidential elections.
It happened 2 years into Bill Clinton's presidency and 2 years into Obama's presidency In B. Clinton's presidency health care was tackled early and failed. It gave an opening to a Congressman from Georgia to devise A Contract with America. It took years to win back the 34 national incumbent Democratic seats lost to Republicans in 1994. (No Republican lost their seats). In B. Obama's presidency heath care was tackled early and was won-but Democrats were unprepared for the blow back-rise of the Tea Party. Possibly we address big issues for the people and then fumble. Both Clinton and Obama brought energy and young people into their campaigns and into the White House-but the party lost strength. |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 10:17 PM
bluestarone (14,755 posts)
29. somehow i see divide and conquer here and
i don't like it
|
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 10:28 PM
pnwmom (107,668 posts)
34. You're comparing apples and oranges.
Diane Feinstein's seniority gives her a Senate leadership position that gives California a special advantage. CA voters would be wise to think about that.
There is no special advantage to nominating Presidential also-rans of a similar age, and the work of a President is much more demanding than of a Senator, even a Senator in a leadership position. I hope our next nominee is younger than Hillary or Bernie. |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:54 AM
msongs (65,371 posts)
40. difi needs to retire. she did not respond to my snail mail suggesting retirement nt
Response to msongs (Reply #40)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 10:30 AM
Scruffy1 (3,182 posts)
55. It's pretty much about the gerrymander.
With only about 1o% of Congressional seats being competitive it's pretty much a given that legislators will run safe races forever. This happens on the state level, also. If you have to fight for your seat, it's a lot easier to retire.Face it, elected officials of all stripes love the attention they get and are laoathe to give up power.This is normal. If we want new and better faces, we need to take back the state governments in places like Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa. Governors are particlarly important because they are the head of the party on the state level.
|
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:44 AM
FSogol (43,735 posts)
42. Bullshit. n/t
Response to FSogol (Reply #42)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:45 AM
Baconator (1,459 posts)
43. Which part of the data did you find the least convincing?
Response to Baconator (Reply #43)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:49 AM
FSogol (43,735 posts)
45. The part where people try and divide our party with a load of bs.
![]() |
Response to FSogol (Reply #45)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 07:20 PM
Baconator (1,459 posts)
66. Ahh.. You just didn't like what it told you...
Slightly different but go nuts...
|
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:51 AM
treestar (81,210 posts)
46. If they are in good health and want to run
I do not care how old they are. We don't need to kick them out, when they are willing, just because age. If Difi can win, that means the voters don't care.
|
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:56 AM
MineralMan (145,031 posts)
48. Hmm...yes...a problem with younger voters, I think.
In reality, ageism is a lousy excuse.
|
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 10:19 AM
doc03 (33,016 posts)
53. Democrats were so confidant that Hillary Clinton was going to
be president we have no second string. I thought she would win too.
I agree totally we have a serious age problem when everyone being considered is on Medicare. I am nearly 70 and I realize myself and everyone I know my age don't have the physical or mental capacity we had 20 years ago. Look at the last election the Republicans had 20 people running for president granted we think most of them are bat shit crazy but not to Republicans. |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 10:20 AM
LonePirate (12,900 posts)
54. This story has the potential to make things awkward around here.
Kind of tough to want new leadership while also supporting one particular leader.
|
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 10:53 AM
left-of-center2012 (34,195 posts)
57. My younger friends have told me ...
"The 2016 election was like choosing between my grandparents"
We need to get back to what JFK said, and pass the torch to a new generation. We honor and respect our older Democratic politicians, but I am often attacked for saying it's time to pass that torch. |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 11:48 AM
frazzled (18,389 posts)
60. The Republican Party has an age problem
Of the top 10 oldest members of the current Senate, 2 are Democrats, 8 are Republicans (Bernie avoids the top ten list by a year; he's 76):
Republicans: Chuck Grassley 84 Orrin Hatch 83 Richard Selby 83 Jim Inhofe 82 John McCain 81 Pat Roberts 81 Thad Cochran 79 Lamar Alexander 77 Democrats Dianne Feinstein 84 Patrick Leahy 77 I haven't computed the House yet, but if it's much younger on the Republican side, they can have it: the young ones are all the Tea Party ideologues who are causing all the chaos and destruction. ON EDIT: I can't find a list of representatives in the House by age, and I'm not looking up 435 members. All I can say is that the average age in the House is currently the highest its ever been (and since there are more Rs than Ds, we'll assume they are part of the problem as well). The average age is currently 57.8 (the previous two Congresses were avg. 57.0 and the one before that 56.7) https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44762.html#_Toc475027524 |
Response to frazzled (Reply #60)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 07:24 PM
Initech (96,365 posts)
67. Roy Moore is 84 and Joe Arpaio is 85.
There's no way either of them would make it past their first term. Or is that intentional?
![]() |
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:03 PM
ucrdem (15,502 posts)
63. And CNN can take credit for it.
Take a bow CNN for making Dem politics a scandal-ridden sh#t show where only saints need apply as all others will inevitably fall prey to the 24-hour bimbo cycle. Accept campaign donations? The FBI will be sure to arrange a stingeroo and CNN will broadcast your perp walk 24/7 the week before your next election. Ever smoked weed? Filed for divorce? Gotten a lot of parking tickets at some point in your life? Sent an email, ever? Yep, your gotcha is coming. Ain't life grand?
|
Response to Baconator (Original post)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:13 PM
LexVegas (5,409 posts)