Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 03:28 PM Oct 2017

A simple rule for honoring our "heroes" and erecting statues or monuments

Here's the simple rule that I suggest when considering whether a statue or monument shall be displayed in the United States.

There shouldn't be a statue displayed anywhere, either on public or private property, that can be construed as celebrating or honoring an individual who has committed treason against the United States.

Obviously, any soldier or official of the Confederacy is guilty of treason. They're wearing their God Damned uniforms in the monuments.

Definition of Treason;

What is the definition of treason in the US?

"Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open Court.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A simple rule for honoring our "heroes" and erecting statues or monuments (Original Post) louis c Oct 2017 OP
No Confederate was convicted of treason. Sneederbunk Oct 2017 #1
Everyone of the statues depicts a Confederat soldier who took up arms against this country louis c Oct 2017 #2
You've struck on an interesting point ProudLib72 Oct 2017 #3
To me, that seems a pretty simple rule of thumb louis c Oct 2017 #4
 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
2. Everyone of the statues depicts a Confederat soldier who took up arms against this country
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 07:41 PM
Oct 2017

They're on horseback, in their Confederate uniforms, armed.

That's treason. They all were pardoned, but that didn't mean they didn't commit treason.

Come on, some things are just obvious. Maybe nobody fought for the South during the Civil War, and it all was just a historical allusion

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
3. You've struck on an interesting point
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 08:01 PM
Oct 2017

Yes, it was treason, but they were pardoned so they could get back to their lives. But what if that treason had been held against them? What if part of the amnesty was an agreement that no monument be made honoring a confederate soldier? Grant was not thinking ahead. Lincoln probably didn't want to bother the south with more concessions, and was murdered before he could realize the mistake. Johnson was pro-south, so there you have it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A simple rule for honorin...