Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

warrior1

(12,325 posts)
1. Yes.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:28 PM
Jul 2012

It's usually called the right to know or need to know. Looking at a return just for the hell of it is illegal and you could lose your job.

left is right

(1,665 posts)
13. I don’t work for IRS but the Census bureau
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 06:34 PM
Jul 2012

occasionally it is possible that I might see IRS co-mingled data. I honestly don’t know whether I have or not. What I do know is that I annually make a signed declaration/oath to protect the privacy of Census data and another one to protect IRS data. The fines are huge but there are also prison sentences for disclosure. I am also obligated to lockdown my 11 letters, numbers and special characters password-protected work station when I leave it for any reason

Solomon

(12,310 posts)
14. Its not could lose your job, its you will lose your job.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 06:42 PM
Jul 2012

And you will go to jail. That's how serious they take it. They even have computer watchers watching where you go on those computers and they will send you an inquiry about why you went somewhere, if they see something that makes them wonder why you went there.

mysuzuki2

(3,521 posts)
3. I'm sure it is. When I worked at SSA you better have a good reason for
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:31 PM
Jul 2012

looking at someone's info. AND they kept track. If I had looked up Mitt or any other prominant person, my boss would have an alert within minutes and I would have been in her office explaining myself not long after. I'm sure IRS has similar safeguards in place. At least for the rank and file employees.

unblock

(52,195 posts)
4. as it stands now, and as a general principal, hell yes it's secret. however,
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:34 PM
Jul 2012

privacy for ordinary taxpayers is a very, VERY good idea.

however, so is disclosure for people who make the voluntary decision to seek federal office.

right now, such disclosure is subject only to political pressures, but it would not be unreasonable to make such disclosures automatic for anyone who puts their name on the ballot, at least for federal office.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
5. IRS employee charged with illegally accessing celebrity tax records
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:35 PM
Jul 2012

Jun 12 2008

An Internal Revenue Service tax examiner has been charged with snooping into the tax records of nearly 200 actors, celebrities, professional athletes, and even his next-door neighbor.

http://www.accountingweb.com/topic/watchdog/irs-employee-charged-illegally-accessing-celebrity-tax-records

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
6. As long as they go to jail for 20 years, that's fine
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:35 PM
Jul 2012

Seriously, Nixon's use of IRS files and GHW Bush's raid on Bill Clinton's passport records were not shocking and immoral just because those guys were Republicans.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
7. I assume that people with high enough security clearance can get away with anything.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:36 PM
Jul 2012

For all we know there is something buried in the Patriot Act that makes it legal.

Given that Nixon had people breaking into his opponent's headquarters forty years ago, the idea that someone hasn't explored the possibility of an audit seems unlikely.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
10. Just what I was thinking.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:39 PM
Jul 2012

Would Nixon do it?

I have no doubt that slimy Republicans would but I don't know about anybody else.

dembotoz

(16,799 posts)
9. one of the big things in watergate if i remember was nixon going after tax records
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:37 PM
Jul 2012

last thing obama needs if for something like this.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
11. You're also dealing with the Hatch Act as well
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:49 PM
Jul 2012

That is, government workers releasing confidential documents in the thick of a political campaign.

If that were to happen, the media would shift the story from Ramney's questionable taxes to how, why and who illegally released the documents. That would not end up good for the Obama campaign.

Booster

(10,021 posts)
12. Just a little warning, although I had no idea. I was applying for a re-fi loan years ago, and
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:53 PM
Jul 2012

the agent had me send in 2 yrs worth of tax returns. Come to find out my tax lady had made a typo of $10,000 on my return which I am ashamed to say I didn't check. The asshole turned me into the IRS and apparently got 10% for doing so. I'd be willing to bet this guy did that on a regular basis - why else would he be checking returns that closely. So tax returns are not totally secret & can show up. You know Mitt's returns are out there someplace.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»are tax returns secret? ...