Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Most Orwellian Voter ID Ad You've Ever Seen
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/07/10/the_most_orwellian_voter_id_ad_you_ve_ever_seen.html?wpisrc=obnetworkBy David Weigel
|
Posted Tuesday, July 10, 2012, at 10:07 AM ET
&feature=player_embedded
On Sunday, Daniel Denvir broke the news that a Mitt Romney bundler, Chris Bravacos, had secured a contract to promote Pennsylvania's new Voter ID law. On Monday, the bundler's company, the Bravo Group, pulled its demo ads off of Vimeo. You should go and read the rest of Denvir's story for the details, and to understand the crooked veins of connections between donors and third-party groups and legislators. In the meantime, you can watch the first ad, rescued by a local Occupy group.
A law that builds a new hurdle for 9.2 percent of Pennsylvania voters is just like the Voting Rights Act that allowed disenfranchised blacks to go to the polls. It makes so much sense now!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1132 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Most Orwellian Voter ID Ad You've Ever Seen (Original Post)
SoCalDem
Jul 2012
OP
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)1. So will Pennsylvania lose 9.2 percent of their Representatives in the House?
Amendment XIV (the amendment that Conservatives absolutely hate):
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Excerpt that remains in context: when the right to vote is denied except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced
Gotta figure out what the numbers will be.
This will make them pitch a fit lol
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)3. I was looking for something else when I found that. And I can not find a later amendment ...
... that cancels it. The "white males" and "21 years of age" portion has been amended. But not the fact that denying people the right to vote decreases their representation.
I think I might try to contact my congress critter about this one.