![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | OP |
Angry Dragon | Nov 2017 | #1 | |
lastlib | Nov 2017 | #7 | |
orangecrush | Nov 2017 | #9 | |
IthinkThereforeIAM | Nov 2017 | #22 | |
barbtries | Nov 2017 | #2 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #3 | |
barbtries | Nov 2017 | #5 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #6 | |
MyOwnPeace | Nov 2017 | #4 | |
LS_Editor | Nov 2017 | #12 | |
DownriverDem | Nov 2017 | #14 | |
annabanana | Nov 2017 | #16 | |
orangecrush | Nov 2017 | #8 | |
Hortensis | Nov 2017 | #10 | |
malaise | Nov 2017 | #18 | |
Hortensis | Nov 2017 | #11 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #24 | |
DownriverDem | Nov 2017 | #13 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #15 | |
bigbrother05 | Nov 2017 | #26 | |
njcpa1978 | Nov 2017 | #17 | |
Hortensis | Nov 2017 | #20 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #25 | |
Hortensis | Nov 2017 | #27 | |
BSdetect | Nov 2017 | #19 | |
Louis1895 | Nov 2017 | #21 | |
Angry Dragon | Nov 2017 | #23 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #28 |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:07 AM
Angry Dragon (36,693 posts)
1. The last good republican president
Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #1)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:39 AM
lastlib (20,260 posts)
7. Except he gave us Nixon..... nt
Response to lastlib (Reply #7)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:47 AM
orangecrush (16,354 posts)
9. Nixon
Didn't fluff Russia, at least.
|
Response to lastlib (Reply #7)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:08 PM
IthinkThereforeIAM (3,032 posts)
22. Prescott Bush Sr brought Nixon to be on Ike's ticket...
..."Little known to most Americans, Prescott Bush, George Bush’s grandfather was Nixon’s top financier from Wall Street. The Nixon campaign was funded by big Eastern financial interests… " [link:http://www.theglobalmovement.info/wp/nixon-prescott-bush-kennedy| |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:16 AM
barbtries (27,239 posts)
2. yep, a vast right wing conspiracy.
the people must push back.
|
Response to barbtries (Reply #2)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:19 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
3. It defeats the idea of parties when the party just wants to do away with the government
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #3)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:37 AM
barbtries (27,239 posts)
5. kinda defeats the idea
of civilization.
|
Response to barbtries (Reply #5)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:38 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
6. Yep! A party that wants to abuse people.
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:34 AM
MyOwnPeace (16,185 posts)
4. He ALSO warned:
"We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex."
Imagine that - a Republican warning against MILITARY spending! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to MyOwnPeace (Reply #4)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 09:45 AM
LS_Editor (893 posts)
12. It was already too late by that point.
Otherwise he would have tried to do something.
|
Response to LS_Editor (Reply #12)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:18 AM
DownriverDem (5,818 posts)
14. We?
Don't you mean our parents and grandparents?
|
Response to DownriverDem (Reply #14)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:23 AM
annabanana (52,791 posts)
16. We, the body politic.. . . n/t
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:46 AM
orangecrush (16,354 posts)
8. Perfect description
Of the current coup
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:59 AM
Hortensis (55,596 posts)
10. "...corruption is not so much a problem for governments as
it is an approach to government, one chosen by far too many rulers today. -- Sarah Chayes
Today's corruption isn't a little nibbling here and there, it is a concerted plot to reorder our systems to serve a few. |
Response to Hortensis (Reply #10)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:26 AM
malaise (254,259 posts)
18. THIS
deserves to be recc'd
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 08:59 AM
Hortensis (55,596 posts)
11. "...corruption is not so much a problem for governments as
it is an approach to government, one chosen by far too many rulers today. -- Sarah Chayes
Today's corruption isn't a little nibbling here and there, it is a concerted plot to reorder our systems to serve a few. (Strangely posted twice, but I'll leave it. Rachel would say it three times. ![]() |
Response to Hortensis (Reply #11)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 03:27 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
24. It is not a bug, it was thee feature all along! and we let it freaking happen to US.
Donald was a promise for corruption from day one.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:17 AM
DownriverDem (5,818 posts)
13. Not to mention
Eisenhower's warning about the military industrial complex too. What bothers and frustrates me the most is, that we were all warned what a trump presidency would be like. I can't help but wonder how those who were sucked in by trump (not the 33% die hards) feel now.
|
Response to DownriverDem (Reply #13)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:19 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
15. Many did not want to listen and kept saying Donald was a joke. It was all very adult & responsible.
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #15)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 04:09 PM
bigbrother05 (5,995 posts)
26. "Oh, that's just political talk, he'll move back to the middle after the election"
They willfully ignored the Dotard's own words and assertions, guess they wanted to believe he was really a closet liberal like the 15 other GOP contenders claimed. They've elected a demagogue and are feeling complicit in the destruction of our country, if not the planet.
|
Response to DownriverDem (Reply #13)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:24 AM
njcpa1978 (114 posts)
17. A little disappointed
That is what the clerk at my local Costco told me about Pres. Tweetstorm. 'A little disappointed' is what I said when I didn't get underwear for Christmas.
|
Response to njcpa1978 (Reply #17)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:35 AM
Hortensis (55,596 posts)
20. Hmmm, sounds like a diplomatic understatement to me.
I'd take it as encouraging.
I certainly don't ask clerks here in blood-red rural Georgia how they feel about Rump, but if one admitted in public to being "a little disappointed" I'd have to control my reaction, keep it tamped down to an appropriately matching level. No clapping or running around to hug. ![]() ![]() |
Response to Hortensis (Reply #20)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 03:28 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
25. Please be sure to record and share.
Last edited Mon Nov 13, 2017, 04:35 PM - Edit history (1) |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #25)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 07:35 PM
Hortensis (55,596 posts)
27. Sure will if it happens. :) It's so deep red around here
that there's no telling who among those who stand pleasantly silent actually disagree with the aggressive right wingers who dominate conversation. It's still a village culture--a feeling that people are supposed to get along for a lifetime, part of that very real "southern charm." In LA, very generally speaking, people are significantly more likely to call bullshit and find new friends.
Appreciate the service of your ACA notice, btw. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:28 AM
BSdetect (8,841 posts)
19. He also identified the MIC as the biggest threat to democracy.
Military Industrial Complex.
They spawned lobbyists. Ensnared politicians. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:49 PM
Louis1895 (763 posts)
21. Full transcript of comments and context
I find it interesting that this is a speech to Republican women. I italicized and bolded the passage presented in the OP.
******* Dwight D. Eisenhower: Remarks at Fourth Annual Republican Women' s National Conference. Bertha, and Ladies: For the past couple of years Miss Adkins fell into the habit of asking me to early morning breakfasts at which she had gathered as the other guests a group of Republican ladies. Now this morning she didn't give me a breakfast but she asked me to a much bigger party. And I came for the same purpose, to meet as nearly personally as it is possible for me to do, the women of this Party who make it their special business to help inform the nation of what the Republican Party is, what it is trying to do, and how it is trying to do it. It is always, for me, a special privilege to address the women of this Party. First of all, for a very practical reason, they tell me there are more women in the United States than there are men. But secondly, I have the most deep conviction that a political party can be called such only if its whole purposes are soundly based in some moral and spiritual values. The women of this nation are more concerned in their day by day work, I think, than are men with these values. They have the job of rearing our young, those youngsters who are so dear to all our hearts, and they want them to grow up with the right kind of values imbedded in them so that as they meet the problems of life they will always have a certain kind of principle, or doctrine, or belief to fall back on that will help guide them through the rough spots. I think the women, therefore, must be concerned with these values, and I return to my statement that if a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power. Now you people--most of you--have heard me say these things before. I repeat them only because I believe them so deeply. And I know that you do. With some of you here I have had long and intimate conversations, and so you can know the great feeling of compliment that I have in being able to come over this morning to do my part in bidding you welcome to our Capital where you are undergoing your present labors, to wish you all the luck in the world in the months to come, and express the confidence that through you America will be informed of what the Republican program means for them and for the world, how far it has gone, what there is left to do, and how we are going to do it; and you will help--in your several districts and all the rest of the places--select the leaders under whom we are going to work. It is a very great pleasure to be here. Moreover, it is an inspiring thing to know that each of you, from far-off stations--and I understand there are six people here from Alaska--have spent your own money to come in, better to equip yourselves to carry on this great work for America for all America--in the months to come and in the years to come. Thank you very much. Note: The President spoke at the Statler Hotel, Washington, D.C., at 10:30 a.m. In his opening remarks the President referred to Bertha Adkins, Assistant to the Chairman of the Republican National Committee. Citation: Dwight D. Eisenhower: "Remarks at Fourth Annual Republican Women' s National Conference.," March 6, 1956. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=10746. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 02:18 PM
Angry Dragon (36,693 posts)
23. One should read the 1956 republican platform one Democrats would endorse
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 09:48 AM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
28. Kicking!